Australian rePublic wrote:Are there any issues about people leaving their inheritance to pets, as opposed to their children/grandchildren
#161 covers this.
Advertisement
by Phydios » Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:21 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:Are there any issues about people leaving their inheritance to pets, as opposed to their children/grandchildren
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by Australian rePublic » Sun Jun 17, 2018 6:14 pm
by Kozmix » Mon Jun 18, 2018 5:28 am
by Frieden-und Freudenland » Mon Jun 18, 2018 5:42 am
Kozmix wrote:Talking about pets, are there issues on furries and other such public procession things?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:39 am
by Kozmix » Mon Jun 18, 2018 7:10 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:There's been plenty of submissions on furries, but none of them really tackle the problem with any nuance other than "furries, yes or no?"
by Trotterdam » Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:37 am
To be fair, the BDSM issue doesn't have much more nuance than that, though it at least justifies it being a political issue by including the question "public BDSM, yes or no?".Candlewhisper Archive wrote:There's been plenty of submissions on furries, but none of them really tackle the problem with any nuance other than "furries, yes or no?"
by Islands of Washington » Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:40 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:There's been plenty of submissions on furries, but none of them really tackle the problem with any nuance other than "furries, yes or no?"
by Frieden-und Freudenland » Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:51 pm
by Sacara » Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:22 pm
Frieden-und Freudenland wrote:Perhaps we could have an issue about @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ complaining about not having a strong passport and not being able to visit many countries without a visa, but would I be assuming too much about @@NAME@@?
The Spacefaring Federation of Sacara"Our Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you" - Neil deGrasse Tyson
I spend most of my time in the Got Issues? sub-forum.
Issues That I've Authored (15)
Commended by SC #382
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:23 pm
Trotterdam wrote:To be fair, the BDSM issue doesn't have much more nuance than that, though it at least justifies it being a political issue by including the question "public BDSM, yes or no?".Candlewhisper Archive wrote:There's been plenty of submissions on furries, but none of them really tackle the problem with any nuance other than "furries, yes or no?"
by Trotterdam » Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:26 pm
What determines a passport's strength? What can a nation do to make its passport stronger (or weaker, if it for some reason wants that)? What reason would a nation have to accept or not accept some other nation's passport?Frieden-und Freudenland wrote:Is there an issue about passport strength? For example, Singaporeans have the world's most powerful passports, as they can visit 165 countries without needing a visa.
The Turkish passport, however, is weaker (Rank 43); as it only allows you to visit 112 countries, and most of those are what Trump would call "shithole countries," so you get the idea...
Perhaps we could have an issue about @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ complaining about not having a strong passport and not being able to visit many countries without a visa, but would I be assuming too much about @@NAME@@?
by Australian rePublic » Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:28 pm
by Frieden-und Freudenland » Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:54 pm
Trotterdam wrote:What determines a passport's strength? What can a nation do to make its passport stronger (or weaker, if it for some reason wants that)? What reason would a nation have to accept or not accept some other nation's passport?Frieden-und Freudenland wrote:Is there an issue about passport strength? For example, Singaporeans have the world's most powerful passports, as they can visit 165 countries without needing a visa.
The Turkish passport, however, is weaker (Rank 43); as it only allows you to visit 112 countries, and most of those are what Trump would call "shithole countries," so you get the idea...
Perhaps we could have an issue about @@DEMONYMPLURAL@@ complaining about not having a strong passport and not being able to visit many countries without a visa, but would I be assuming too much about @@NAME@@?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Jun 18, 2018 5:22 pm
by Australian rePublic » Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:49 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Hmmm, I wonder if its to do with geopolitical positioning. Singapore has made it acceptable to both China and America, for example.
Good topic though. If well researched, would be an excellent issue.
Here's a fun link, where a British newspaper uses a ridiculously generous definition of "3rd place".
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news ... orts-2018/
by Frieden-und Freudenland » Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:58 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Hmmm, I wonder if its to do with geopolitical positioning. Singapore has made it acceptable to both China and America, for example.
Good topic though. If well researched, would be an excellent issue.
Here's a fun link, where a British newspaper uses a ridiculously generous definition of "3rd place".
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news ... orts-2018/
Another reason could be recognition. If you're not recognised, your passport's not accepted
by Frieden-und Freudenland » Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:53 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:05 am
Frieden-und Freudenland wrote:By the way, is there an issue about selfie enthusiasts dying while they're trying to take selfies in dangerous places? Like, you know, rebellious youngsters climb up a skyscraper illegally and take a selfie at the top just so they can post it on Instagram. Something like that.
Some touristic places have indeed banned selfies (or selfie sticks) to prevent such deaths.
https://www.cntraveler.com/galleries/20 ... -landmarks
Maybe this could make a good issue?
by Frieden-und Freudenland » Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:32 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Frieden-und Freudenland wrote:By the way, is there an issue about selfie enthusiasts dying while they're trying to take selfies in dangerous places? Like, you know, rebellious youngsters climb up a skyscraper illegally and take a selfie at the top just so they can post it on Instagram. Something like that.
Some touristic places have indeed banned selfies (or selfie sticks) to prevent such deaths.
https://www.cntraveler.com/galleries/20 ... -landmarks
Maybe this could make a good issue?
I did a draft in March 2017, so would feel super-sad if you made it obsolete.
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=407450
But no rule against open competition, of course.
by Kozmix » Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:32 am
by Kozmix » Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:55 pm
by He Qixin » Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:19 pm
jacknjellify wrote:Watch Battle For Dream Island or be eliminated.
by Liberimery » Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:31 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Verdant Haven
Advertisement