Steelfeather Rapture 2 wrote:Issue #198 ("Not All Those Who Wander Are Paying") makes reference to private property in its introduction. That could use a socialism-friendliness fix. There shouldn't be landowners per se in SR2.
Given the specifics of this exact issue, I think you're probably right. A farm is a means of production that seems like it ought to be under gov't control in a Socialist nation. I'm not convinced land ownership by itself is a problem though - this is part of an ongoing situation that I think causes a lot of challenges when writing.
Socialism is not Communism, but a lot of the options and issues written for Socialism nations are written as if Soviet-style Communism can be assumed. While Communism would absolutely see a lack of private ownership of real property, Socialism doesn't inherently have such a such lack. A Socialist government controls industry/business/resources/production, but still allows for private property, which can include one or more places of residence. Now how much land is included in that residential ownership could turn into an interesting question, which the ultra-simplified model we use isn't equipped to treat at this time, but I think we definitely have to look at it case by case.
At any rate, like I said above, I think you're right due to the specific production-based nature of this particular issue's land, and I'll bring it up backstage to see if we can sort out a solution.