NATION

PASSWORD

Help us fix old issues

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Clintonian America
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Aug 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Clintonian America » Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:55 pm

This nation encountered issue 939, despite having the “theocracy” policy. Should that be possible? At the very least, the line in 939.1 “@@NATION@@ believes in freedom of religion, does it not?” doesn’t make much sense, does it?

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:40 am

Allishive wrote:Hello!

I recently encountered an issue (#167) that I believe has a typo in option 1.
I think "want" should be "wants"


No typo there, it is correct as it stands.

Maybe a trans-Atlantic thing, though. I know that in American English you chaps often use singular forms of verbs for collective nouns, whereas the British tend to use plural forms.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:41 am

Clintonian America wrote:This nation encountered issue 939, despite having the “theocracy” policy. Should that be possible? At the very least, the line in 939.1 “@@NATION@@ believes in freedom of religion, does it not?” doesn’t make much sense, does it?


Fixed, thanks.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Socio Polor
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1240
Founded: Nov 28, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Socio Polor » Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:04 pm

#855: Thin Evidence [USS Monitor; ed:The Free Joy State]

The Issue
The spread of obesity in @@NAME@@ has fed a cottage industry of weight-loss gimmicks promising immediate results.

I think this should be worded "The spread of obesity in @@NAME@@ has fed the cottage industry weight-loss gimmicks promising immediate results.
Last edited by Socio Polor on Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Free Joy State
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16402
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Joy State » Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:52 pm

Socio Polor wrote:
#855: Thin Evidence [USS Monitor; ed:The Free Joy State]

The Issue
The spread of obesity in @@NAME@@ has fed a cottage industry of weight-loss gimmicks promising immediate results.

I think this should be worded "The spread of obesity in @@NAME@@ has fed the cottage industry weight-loss gimmicks promising immediate results.

"a" is fine. No change needed.
"If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." - Toni Morrison

My nation does not represent my beliefs or politics.

User avatar
Allishive
Secretary
 
Posts: 31
Founded: Sep 30, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Allishive » Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:18 pm

Candlewhisper Archive wrote:
Allishive wrote:Hello!

I recently encountered an issue (#167) that I believe has a typo in option 1.
I think "want" should be "wants"


No typo there, it is correct as it stands.

Maybe a trans-Atlantic thing, though. I know that in American English you chaps often use singular forms of verbs for collective nouns, whereas the British tend to use plural forms.

Ah. My mistake. Yes, us 'Muricans have weird ways of saying things.
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:33 am

For reference, the editing rule is that British English or American English is fine, so long as it's consistent within a single issue, and should follow the nationality of the author, not the editor.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Hurjaki
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurjaki » Fri Mar 08, 2019 2:32 pm

Issue #270 references to real life planet Mars.

User avatar
Pogaria
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 3724
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pogaria » Fri Mar 08, 2019 6:32 pm

Hurjaki wrote:Issue #270 references to real life planet Mars.

I'm not seeing how that's a problem.
FYI: Pogaria is pronounced like puh-GAIR-ee-uh

User avatar
Leppikania
Minister
 
Posts: 2332
Founded: Apr 13, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Leppikania » Sat Mar 09, 2019 6:04 pm

Issue #1166 seems a bit odd to a country with an aquatic national animal.
INTP, -4.25 Economic Left/Right, -4.1 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian, tastes like chicken.
I do use NS stats, thank you very much.
Funny Quotes
Pie charts for industries
Request an Embassy

User avatar
Imperium Socialistarum Orientale
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperium Socialistarum Orientale » Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:50 am

Wait, is Issue #3 really mentioning Christianity?
It seems it is, so that should be removed.

EDIT: By the way, #39 mentions Catholics in option 2. It should just say "Reverend Randomname of a major religion".
Last edited by Imperium Socialistarum Orientale on Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:51 am

Leppikania wrote:Issue #1166 seems a bit odd to a country with an aquatic national animal.


For sure, but we've never worried about whether the @@ANIMAL@@ macro creates sensible narratives. Instead we intentionally disregard that, for the sake of humour. My national animal of "Seven-Toed Anxious Dolphin Mutant Thing" also creates odd looking issues.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:53 am

Imperium Socialistarum Orientale wrote:Wait, is Issue #3 really mentioning Christianity?
It seems it is, so that should be removed.

EDIT: By the way, #39 mentions Catholics in option 2. It should just say "Reverend Randomname of a major religion".


It's been discussed at length whether historic mentions of RL religions should be purged. Majority consensus is to let them alone, but to avoid using them in future.
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Hediacrana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1225
Founded: Nov 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Hediacrana » Wed Mar 13, 2019 12:15 pm

Should I, with a nation having the Socialism policy, be receiving option 766.1?
'If you're not anti-war, then you're not fiscally conservative, and you're certainly not pro-life.'
Parent, spouse, leftist Christian and suspected witch.
She/her.

User avatar
The Darkledger
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Mar 01, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby The Darkledger » Wed Mar 13, 2019 2:03 pm

“You have to stop this madness!” yells Peter O, the mother of an eighthback for The Darkledger City High School. “My son has received so many concussions that his grades are dropping. To hell with tradition, our children’s fragile brains are more important!”

Text I got from issue 415.

Peter is a man’s name, but it’s the mother. Shouldn’t it be @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ as opposed to @@RANDOMNAME@@?

User avatar
Sanctaria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7922
Founded: Sep 12, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sanctaria » Wed Mar 13, 2019 2:11 pm

The Darkledger wrote:
“You have to stop this madness!” yells Peter O, the mother of an eighthback for The Darkledger City High School. “My son has received so many concussions that his grades are dropping. To hell with tradition, our children’s fragile brains are more important!”

Text I got from issue 415.

Peter is a man’s name, but it’s the mother. Shouldn’t it be @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ as opposed to @@RANDOMNAME@@?

Fixed.
Divine Federation of Sanctaria

Ideological Bulwark #258

Dr. Bethany Greer CMD, Sanctarian Ambassador to the World Assembly
Author of:
GA#109 GA#133 GA#176 GA#201 GA#222 GA#297
GA#590 (Co)
Frisbeeteria wrote:Do people not realize that moderators can tell when someone is wanking?

Luna Amore wrote:Sanc is always watching. Ever vigilant.

Auralia wrote:Your condescending attitude is remarkably annoying.

User avatar
Deus Caymania
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Mar 03, 2019
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Deus Caymania » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:21 am

Hi I am a relatively new member and I was wondering where do I go to begin the submission process for issues?

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21479
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:30 am

Deus Caymania wrote:Hi I am a relatively new member and I was wondering where do I go to begin the submission process for issues?

Start by reading the guide, ask in this thread here if you want advice about whether a particular idea is worth trying, and then post a draft of your issue in a thread of its own in this forum -- with '[DRAFT]' at the start of that thread's title -- for feedback.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Hurjaki
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 18
Founded: May 26, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurjaki » Mon Mar 18, 2019 4:02 am

Hurjaki got Issue #58 "Violent Violetists Demand Blood!" despite it already has human sacrifice policy enacted.
And even better: As we took an option that should outlaw it, it remained.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:32 am

Hurjaki wrote:Hurjaki got Issue #58 "Violent Violetists Demand Blood!" despite it already has human sacrifice policy enacted.
And even better: As we took an option that should outlaw it, it remained.


Thanks! There was a typo creating a double negative policy check, so exactly the wrong group was getting the issue.

Fixed now.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Nullarni
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1348
Founded: Sep 26, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Nullarni » Mon Mar 18, 2019 10:28 am

Hello, on issue 739, "In Loco Parentis", option three has a slight issue.

The second sentence reads:
“Clearly capability varies from child to child, but some of us are obviously more advanced than others."

The issue here is that the word "but" is supposed to link two contrasting ideas. In my reading of the sentence, the two ideas are just rewordings of the same thing. I suggest using "and" rather than "but". That way it would read:
“Clearly capability varies from child to child, and some of us are obviously more advanced than others."

I know its minor, but it sort of stood out to me.
Proud founder of the NEW WARSAW PACT. Visitors welcome.

User avatar
Candlewhisper Archive
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 23652
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Anarchy

Postby Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Mar 19, 2019 2:31 am

Nullarni wrote:Hello, on issue 739, "In Loco Parentis", option three has a slight issue.

The second sentence reads:
“Clearly capability varies from child to child, but some of us are obviously more advanced than others."

The issue here is that the word "but" is supposed to link two contrasting ideas. In my reading of the sentence, the two ideas are just rewordings of the same thing. I suggest using "and" rather than "but". That way it would read:
“Clearly capability varies from child to child, and some of us are obviously more advanced than others."

I know its minor, but it sort of stood out to me.


It's in character speech from a 7-year-old child who thinks he is very clever, but who is ultimately a child. It's fine.
Last edited by Candlewhisper Archive on Tue Mar 19, 2019 2:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
editors like linguistic ambiguity more than most people

User avatar
Jutsa
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5513
Founded: Dec 06, 2015
Capitalizt

Postby Jutsa » Thu Mar 21, 2019 7:39 am

I got #1030.5 which still mentions condoms, despite contraceptives being illegal in my nation. :P
You're welcome to telegram me any questions you have of the game. Unless I've CTE'd (ceased to exist) - then you physically can't do that.

Helpful* Got Issues? Links (Not Pinned In Forum) *mostly: >List of Issue-Related Lists | >Personal List of Issue Ideas | >List of Known Missing Issues/Options |
>Trotterdam's Issue Results/Policies Tracker | >Val's Bonus Stats | >Fauzjhia's Easter Egg Guide | >My Joke Drafts List | >Sherp's Author Rankings

Other Nifty Links: >Best-Ranked Useful Dispatches | >NSindex | >IA's WA Proposal Office | >Major Discord Links | >Trivia | >Cards Against NS | >Polls

"Remember, licking doorknobs is perfectly legal on other planets." - Ja Luıñaí

User avatar
The Aligned People
Secretary
 
Posts: 39
Founded: May 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Aligned People » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:34 pm

Typo:
#1139: A Little Wrestling, a Lot of Controversy [USS Monitor; ed: Candlewhisper Archive]

The Issue
A dwarf wrestling tour was cut short after advocacy groups complained that it was demeaning.

The Debate
1. “Just look at this!” fumes three-foot-tall disabled rights activist @@RANDOMNAME@@, waving around a poster that you can’t see for from the top of your desk. “This isn’t a sporting event; this is a modern-day freak show. It even says they have a ‘midget toss’! I know the wrestlers agreed to participate, but they aren’t the only ones that have to live with the dehumanizing stereotypes. @@NAME@@ shouldn’t tolerate entertainment that pokes fun at people for their size or disabilities.”

I believe that the "for" I struck out should be "from."
The Aligned People
"We cannot be separated in interest or divided in purpose. We stand together until the end."

User avatar
Trotterdam
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10541
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:59 pm

It's a slightly-archaic use of "for" that means "because of" ("can't see the forest for the trees"). You're not standing on the top of your desk, it's just blocking your vision.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kyallisar, The Rhein States

Advertisement

Remove ads