Advertisement
by Clintonian America » Sun Mar 03, 2019 7:55 pm
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:40 am
Allishive wrote:Hello!
I recently encountered an issue (#167) that I believe has a typo in option 1.
I think "want" should be "wants"
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 04, 2019 1:41 am
Clintonian America wrote:This nation encountered issue 939, despite having the “theocracy” policy. Should that be possible? At the very least, the line in 939.1 “@@NATION@@ believes in freedom of religion, does it not?” doesn’t make much sense, does it?
by Socio Polor » Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:04 pm
#855: Thin Evidence [USS Monitor; ed:The Free Joy State]
The Issue
The spread of obesity in @@NAME@@ has fed a cottage industry of weight-loss gimmicks promising immediate results.
by The Free Joy State » Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:52 pm
Socio Polor wrote:#855: Thin Evidence [USS Monitor; ed:The Free Joy State]
The Issue
The spread of obesity in @@NAME@@ has fed a cottage industry of weight-loss gimmicks promising immediate results.
I think this should be worded "The spread of obesity in @@NAME@@ has fed the cottage industry weight-loss gimmicks promising immediate results.
by Allishive » Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:18 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Allishive wrote:Hello!
I recently encountered an issue (#167) that I believe has a typo in option 1.
I think "want" should be "wants"
No typo there, it is correct as it stands.
Maybe a trans-Atlantic thing, though. I know that in American English you chaps often use singular forms of verbs for collective nouns, whereas the British tend to use plural forms.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:33 am
by Leppikania » Sat Mar 09, 2019 6:04 pm
by Imperium Socialistarum Orientale » Sun Mar 10, 2019 5:50 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:51 am
Leppikania wrote:Issue #1166 seems a bit odd to a country with an aquatic national animal.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:53 am
Imperium Socialistarum Orientale wrote:Wait, is Issue #3 really mentioning Christianity?
It seems it is, so that should be removed.
EDIT: By the way, #39 mentions Catholics in option 2. It should just say "Reverend Randomname of a major religion".
by Hediacrana » Wed Mar 13, 2019 12:15 pm
by The Darkledger » Wed Mar 13, 2019 2:03 pm
“You have to stop this madness!” yells Peter O, the mother of an eighthback for The Darkledger City High School. “My son has received so many concussions that his grades are dropping. To hell with tradition, our children’s fragile brains are more important!”
by Sanctaria » Wed Mar 13, 2019 2:11 pm
The Darkledger wrote:“You have to stop this madness!” yells Peter O, the mother of an eighthback for The Darkledger City High School. “My son has received so many concussions that his grades are dropping. To hell with tradition, our children’s fragile brains are more important!”
Text I got from issue 415.
Peter is a man’s name, but it’s the mother. Shouldn’t it be @@RANDOMMALENAME@@ as opposed to @@RANDOMNAME@@?
by Deus Caymania » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:21 am
by Bears Armed » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:30 am
Deus Caymania wrote:Hi I am a relatively new member and I was wondering where do I go to begin the submission process for issues?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Mar 18, 2019 5:32 am
Hurjaki wrote:Hurjaki got Issue #58 "Violent Violetists Demand Blood!" despite it already has human sacrifice policy enacted.
And even better: As we took an option that should outlaw it, it remained.
by Nullarni » Mon Mar 18, 2019 10:28 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Mar 19, 2019 2:31 am
Nullarni wrote:Hello, on issue 739, "In Loco Parentis", option three has a slight issue.
The second sentence reads:
“Clearly capability varies from child to child, but some of us are obviously more advanced than others."
The issue here is that the word "but" is supposed to link two contrasting ideas. In my reading of the sentence, the two ideas are just rewordings of the same thing. I suggest using "and" rather than "but". That way it would read:
“Clearly capability varies from child to child, and some of us are obviously more advanced than others."
I know its minor, but it sort of stood out to me.
by Jutsa » Thu Mar 21, 2019 7:39 am
by The Aligned People » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:34 pm
#1139: A Little Wrestling, a Lot of Controversy [USS Monitor; ed: Candlewhisper Archive]
The Issue
A dwarf wrestling tour was cut short after advocacy groups complained that it was demeaning.
The Debate
1. “Just look at this!” fumes three-foot-tall disabled rights activist @@RANDOMNAME@@, waving around a poster that you can’t seeforfrom the top of your desk. “This isn’t a sporting event; this is a modern-day freak show. It even says they have a ‘midget toss’! I know the wrestlers agreed to participate, but they aren’t the only ones that have to live with the dehumanizing stereotypes. @@NAME@@ shouldn’t tolerate entertainment that pokes fun at people for their size or disabilities.”
by Trotterdam » Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:59 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Kyallisar, The Rhein States
Advertisement