Australian rePublic wrote:Issue 0000 is a bit bias against elderly gun nuts, especially considering that we have issues in favour of said gun nuts
This isn't a thread to suggest subjective narrative changes. It's for objective errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation and suspected errors with macros and validities.
If you think a narrative could be improved somehow, I suggest you first test the water in The Writer's Block. If you find that people agree with you, you might want to start a new thread later. Although the bar for changing the first 30 issues is exceptionally high. Though it has been done, if necessary.
That said, if you mean that one reference in option #2, it should be reiterated that all speakers in options have an internal bias in favour of their own viewpoint. I fail to see why this one option is a problem.