Advertisement
by Lamebrainia » Tue Jun 14, 2016 1:46 am
by Trotterdam » Tue Jun 14, 2016 6:13 am
Please post it in the spoiler thread if you still have it. (Even if I already know what it's about.)Lamebrainia wrote:Issue #531
by Trotterdam » Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:25 pm
Is the speaker in the first option supposed to be the same man as in the issue preamble? The rather specific complaint over "spy on my kin" kind of implies a continuation of the previous story, in which case the character should be a @@RANDOMMALENAME@@, and not, say, Stephanie Lopez, which is what I got.#528 wrote:The Issue
A man was arrested for shooting down a drone flown near his house. The drone had a camera attached and was allegedly 'ogling his teenage daughter'. Citizens have demanded action over unmanned, publicly available spy drones.
The Debate
1. "Ain't nobody got the right to spy on my kin!" shouts @@RANDOMNAME@@ at a gun rights demonstration outside the capitol building. "It's trespassing is what it is! If you can't climb through my window and take pictures of my house, why should you be able to do it with a flying doohickey? It's my god-given right to shoot down anything that violates my airspace, dagnamit!"
by Wiewawoe » Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:50 am
Gigaverse wrote:So I just got Issue 527, and I think I personally have a problem with that.
"King Oswyn V, the last king of @@NAME@@"? So then does that mean every nation will have a last king whose name is Oswyn V; regardless of the government type?
Maybe it's unimportant, and we can always dismiss the issue; but perhaps something can be done for this issue to be... fitter. Perhaps the removal of the name "Oswyn V"?
by Venetoland » Sat Jun 18, 2016 7:57 am
by Phydios » Sat Jun 18, 2016 1:12 pm
Venetoland wrote:Would it be possible to chNge it to the more current term "transgender"? IMO this is the better term, AND does not substantially effect the issue.
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by Bruination » Sat Jun 18, 2016 4:16 pm
Phydios wrote:Venetoland wrote:Would it be possible to chNge it to the more current term "transgender"? IMO this is the better term, AND does not substantially effect the issue.
I thought "transsexual" referred to those that had undergone surgery to change their physical body to something closer to what they believe they are mentally, and "transgender" referred to those that hadn't had such surgery but are living as their believed gender. Am I wrong?
by Phydios » Sat Jun 18, 2016 5:15 pm
Bruination wrote:Phydios wrote:I thought "transsexual" referred to those that had undergone surgery to change their physical body to something closer to what they believe they are mentally, and "transgender" referred to those that hadn't had such surgery but are living as their believed gender. Am I wrong?
AFAIK, neither term references surgeries or the lack thereof. They essentially both refer to gender identity only, regardless of surgical history, but "transsexual" is an older term that has fallen out of favor because of its more clinical sound (and possibly other reasons).
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by Lamebrainia » Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:25 pm
We could do with rearranging the number of seats each constituency get
hear hear
splendid in fact. But, election season is nearing
by Christian Democrats » Sun Jun 19, 2016 3:52 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Transsexual remains a commonly used term, and I'm not seeing any significant evidence that's it's widely considered offensive.
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Bruination » Sun Jun 19, 2016 10:03 pm
by Trotterdam » Sun Jun 19, 2016 10:29 pm
by Bruination » Sun Jun 19, 2016 11:48 pm
Trotterdam wrote:And #066 doesn't use it as an umbrella term, it uses it to describe one particular person who identifies as such and was the center of a controversy.
Now can we stop talking about this?
by Trotterdam » Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:58 am
"Towns'" should have an apostrophe.#536 option 1 wrote:self-appointed head of one of the border towns lynch mobs, Edward Salem.
"Dark-haired" should have a hyphen.#536 option 2 wrote:a tall, dark haired mysterious stranger
Is the use of a Unicode dash intentional? I thought issues prefer to avoid Unicode versions of things that exist in ASCII.#536 option 3 wrote:–
by Luna Amore » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:09 am
Trotterdam wrote:Some punctuation in #536, according to the recently posted version:"Towns'" should have an apostrophe.#536 option 1 wrote:self-appointed head of one of the border towns lynch mobs, Edward Salem."Dark-haired" should have a hyphen.#536 option 2 wrote:a tall, dark haired mysterious strangerIs the use of a Unicode dash intentional? I thought issues prefer to avoid Unicode versions of things that exist in ASCII.#536 option 3 wrote:–
by Trotterdam » Mon Jun 20, 2016 11:30 am
by Venetoland » Mon Jun 20, 2016 3:16 pm
Bruination wrote:Trotterdam wrote:And #066 doesn't use it as an umbrella term, it uses it to describe one particular person who identifies as such and was the center of a controversy.
Now can we stop talking about this?
I honestly, genuinely see it using the term as an umbrella, but I will stop talking about this at your request. I deeply apologize for not sharing your view on this.
by Ainin » Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:08 am
by Christian Democrats » Thu Jun 23, 2016 5:25 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by G-Max » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:22 am
Luna Amore wrote:Taxes went down for you on that issue so I have no idea what you are ranting about.
Once again, there is a megathread for general stat changes post the major issue update.
Include the nation, the issue number
choice selected
and what stat you think is incorrect
by Luna Amore » Fri Jun 24, 2016 9:31 am
G-Max wrote:Second, your link does NOT indicate, AT ALL, which issues caused my tax rates to go up and which ones made it go down. It only shows a general downward trend in taxes.
G-Max wrote:Once again, there is a megathread for general stat changes post the major issue update.
It would be nice if you had, at any point, told me what that thread was, or even mentioned that such a thread existed. I'm kind of taking a wild-ass guess that this is the correct one. Let me know if it isn't.
G-Max wrote:Include the nation, the issue number
Issues have numbers? How am I supposed to know what they are?
G-Max wrote:choice selected
How is that even remotely relevant to anything? My complaints are normally that all the options suck and that I have to dismiss the issue.
G-Max wrote:and what stat you think is incorrect
That would be much easier if there was some way of knowing what the effects actually are. Like I said, I started a whole thread about that very problem.
by Eahland » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:38 pm
by Trotterdam » Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:11 pm
by United Chrisraelistine » Fri Jun 24, 2016 7:28 pm
by G-Max » Fri Jun 24, 2016 9:12 pm
Easter Egg: Should We Pull The Lever?
The Issue
During the middle of the night, someone has mysteriously put a lever in the middle of the city park. On it, it says, "Pull the Lever, And See The World End."
The Debate
1. "I've always wanted to see the apocalypse." says an elderly man on a park bench. "All that fire and brimstone. To see God's wrath. Something I can tell my grandchildren about later on. I say we should."
2. "Not on your life!" says his wife sitting next to him. "If you pull that lever, we'll have no grandchildren, no life, only heaven and hell. Don't you dare pull that lever."
3. "Now, don't think of it as a do/don't option," says a hot dog vendor. "What if we give tours so that people can see the lever? Not to touch it of course, but to see that humanity can be ruined by such a contraption. We can make a profit."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement