NATION

PASSWORD

military issue help

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Niur
Senator
 
Posts: 4018
Founded: Aug 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

military issue help

Postby Niur » Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:14 am

I have no idea what to do


The Issue
After years of costly military build-up, the military now has a state of readiness capable of responding to all threats, both foreign and domestic. There is extensive debate among government officials, the military, and the average citizen over what, if anything, should be done with this powerful asset.

The Debate
"No one even thinks to look at us funny now," says Field Marshall Lionel Mandrake as he taps a swagger stick against his hip. "So think about how they'd act when the military is in proper charge of the country? We'd say jump, and they'd jump, by jingo. Oh, and if you don't agree with me, consider this a coup."



"There's no point in having a military this size when our closest adversary has a water pistol strapped to a scooter and calls it an armoured brigade," says noted economist Thomas Winters. "Besides, the military's been getting uppity with all its funding anyway. Slash its budget, sell off its surplus, and put the money into tax relief and... of course... maintaining all those contractors. Sure, they won't make tanks anymore but they can sure make plenty of commemorative plates with all that money!"

This is the position your government is preparing to adopt.


"The military is too powerful!" cries famous peacenik Elvis Gandhi, smelling of petrol and holding a Zippo in one hand. "All those tanks and bombs threaten us and the environment - we're number one, and someone's gonna try and take us down because of it! The people are tired of eating grass soup so the army can get another stealth ICBM launching flamethrower tank. Cut military funding and rebuild our schools, hospitals, welfare, and environment... or else!" Upon which he flips open the lid of the lighter threateningly.



"Everyone's got it all wrong," says Abraham Longbottom, leader of the Niur Libertarian Party. "We need the military now to support our economy but we can't let it get out of control. I say we privatise it and divvy it up between several corporations, and make it self funding... it sounds radical but taxes will drop, the people will be happy, and we get to keep our military strength to show Johnny Foreigner what's what! Everyone wins! As long it's in the corporations' best interests to protect the country though, I suppose..."
"In cahuitontli ca otopan, yehuantzitzin yollochipahuac tonaz, yeceh yehuantzitzin tica imanimanmeh tlahueliloc telchihualozque. In cahuitontli ca teuctlatolli ic otopan, auh yehuan quitzacua, in neltiliztli, onyezque huetztoc!"

User avatar
Cynthia McKinney
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Dec 11, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: military issue help

Postby Cynthia McKinney » Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:48 pm

This is easy. Stop wasting money on the military by choosing option 3 and use the money for education, healthcare, welfare, and the environment.

User avatar
Aridiya
Envoy
 
Posts: 202
Founded: Oct 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aridiya » Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:12 pm

Use option two. Nobody invades anybody in Nation States.

User avatar
New Ziedrich
Minister
 
Posts: 2654
Founded: Jan 24, 2006
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby New Ziedrich » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:35 pm

Cynthia McKinney wrote:This is easy. Stop wasting money on the military by choosing option 3 and use the money for education, healthcare, welfare, and the environment.


Your opinion, quite possibly not his.

Niur, I'm pretty sure option 1 reduces politcal freedoms by a fair amount, which you might not want. Option 4 will boost your economic freedoms, I think. The other options are wrong. :p

Don't you role play? That should be taken into consideration as well.
Science makes everything better!
“Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition.”
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred."
-Niccolo Machiavelli

User avatar
Former Principalities
Diplomat
 
Posts: 881
Founded: Jun 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Former Principalities » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:40 pm

Option 2 is perhaps the right one as it isn't as drastic as the others.

User avatar
The Orbital Death Ray
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Jul 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Orbital Death Ray » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:46 pm

Slashing the military but maintaining the contractors. Where do those contractors come from?

User avatar
New Ziedrich
Minister
 
Posts: 2654
Founded: Jan 24, 2006
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby New Ziedrich » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:47 pm

Former Principalities wrote:Option 2 is perhaps the right one as it isn't as drastic as the others.


Provided that he is willing to sacrifice his military strength at all, option 2 is far less drastic than option 3. He might not wish to do that, however. This is one of those options that forces most people to truly think about their country's priorities.
Science makes everything better!
“Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition.”
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred."
-Niccolo Machiavelli


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lindsay

Advertisement

Remove ads