[DRAFT] Global Climate Change: A Problem in @@NAME@@?

[Yuktova]

Greetings, this is my first Issue. I hope that someone did not do this already, but if so, I am sorry.

Name: Global Warming: A Problem in @@NAME@@?

Description:
Recently, environmentalists have conducted protests and raised concern among the populace about global climate change. The people have come to you in order to decide what to do.

Validity:
To any nation.

[option] "Look", says noted environmentalist @@RANDOMNAME@@, author of the famous book Environmetalism for Stupid People. "We got a hole in our Ozone layer right above our capital city, and I just got sunburned all over by body because of that. Every day, the water rises from us and coporations using fossil fuels. Hell, just the other day my house was already flooded and I don't live near a beach! We have to do something about this leader! We have to spend some good, old money on saving the planet!"
[effect] spending on the environment has increased as the government tries to help polar bears
[stats] Environment spending goes up a lot. Economy goes flat on its face.

[option] "Who cares about an early summer in @@NAME@@! We don't need to change it!" shouts your conservative economic advisor @@RANDOMNAME@@. "We don't need to give funds to mother nature! This global warming thing is just a scam to give the poor some money. Let's cut some education and welfare programs while we're at it too! And hey, I could make a decent profit selling fossil fuels at lower prices, because there will always be more next year!"
[effect] the poor and children are left to die in the desert known as @@NAME@@
[stats] economy goes sky-rocketing, civil rights go down, any previous Environmental spending goes away, most rebelious youth increases

[option] "Now, I think that we should weaponize the animals that are going extinct!," says well-known general @@RANDOMNAME@@. "That way, we can destory are enemies with some birds, whales, and bears armed with nuclear missle launchers!"
[effect] @@NAME@@ have adopted a policy of attaching a nuclear bomb on all polar bears.
[stats] defense way goes up, environmental spending stays the same.


So, what do you guys think? Hope you enjoy it!

[Greater Cabinda]

Seems like it would need a wacky option.

Maybe something about building up defense to protect the nation from polar bears or penguins?

Also, the third option is too sane. NS issues are supposed to be extreme.

[Yuktova]

There, I changed it so that he recommends using endangered species.

[Panageadom]

I'd be surprised if this didn't already exist, but I don't think it does. Here are my thoughts. I'm afraid that although I think a climate change issue is a very interesting political issue, this particular issue needs lots of work.

Greetings, this is my first Issue. I hope that someone did not do this already, but if so, I am sorry.

Name: Global Warming: A Problem in @@NAME@@?

Description:
Recently, environmentalists have conducted protests and raised concern among the populance about Global Climate Change Why capitals? I also think the global is superfluous: yes, technically climate could be a local thing, but "climate change" is usually implied as a global phenomenon.. The people have come to you in order to decide what to do.

Validity:
To any nation with none to below %10 of Environment spending. This technically wouldn't influence global warming explicitly. I'd just make it valid for all nations.


[option] "Look", says noted environmentalist @@RANDOMNAME@@ Typically, you'd have a little phrase afterwards parodying something he was doing, or had done e.g. "author of...", "flailing his arms about", etc. , "The sun is getting brighter today than it was yesterday Um. What? That's not how climate change works. . Every day, a polar bear dies or gets it's habitate wrecked because of our use of fossil fuels. You've missed out more important, politically speaking, reasons for climate change legislation: e.g. flooding, the way rich companies profit from fossil fuels, but every bares the cost... We have to do something about this leader! We have to spend some good, old money on saving the planet! And do what with it? "
[effect] environmental spending has increased as the government tries to help polar bears
[stats] Environment spending goes up some. Economy goes down very little. I'd say, more, but it's completely unclear what this option actually advocates doing - some options are more damaging to the economy than others. Some are actually beneficial.

[option] "Who cares about some stupid polar bears! We don't need them!" shouts your conservative economic advisor @@RANDOMNAME@@. "We don't need to give funds to mother nature! This global warming thing is just a scam to give the poor some money. Let's cut some education and welfare programs while we're at it too!" Please. There is no argument here, apart from the initial bit about polar bears, which is tangential to the whole argument anyway.
[effect] the poor and children are left to die in the desert known as @@NAME@@ Nowhere are these consequences addressed in the issue, which is about polar bears.
[stats] economy goes sky-rocketing, civil rights go down, any previous Environmental spending goes away, happiness decreases Similiarly silly.

[option] "Now, I think that we should weaponize the animals that are going extinct!," says well-known general @@RANDOMNAME@@. "That way, we can destory are enemies with some birds, whales, and bears armed with nuclear missle launchers!"
[effect] @@NAME@@ have adopted a policy of attaching a nuclear bomb on all polar bears.
[stats] defense way goes up, environmental spending stays the same.

Beyond silly. Yes, NS goes for wacky options, but there's a line. And that's where the point is vaguely connected to the issue, and actually could faintly conceivably happen.

So, what do you guys think? Hope you enjoy it!

Sorry if that sounds harsh. If this is your first issue, I appreciate how hard it is to write it the first time.

[Yuktova]

Alright, I will try changing it to your recommendations..