Should The Government Grant Estates And Titles Of Nobility?
I'm pondering either option 1
"Of course I should be appointed as the Duke of Romlia City," says multi-billionaire Elizabeth Jefferson. "Not only would it be an apt reward for my contributions to Romlia, but the citizens who become landed serfs on my estate would work harder than they ever have in all their lives." Adds small-government advocate Beth Wong, "Government would at last return to the local level, close to the people and the land to which they would be bound for life."
or 3
"I think both of the other parties are taking this issue to the extreme," argues a learned elderly gentleman resting on a park bench. "All that's being advocated is giving those who have contributed to their nation a ceremonial title and a bit of land. Besides," he adds, "the government can tax their estate."
What can the implications be?



