NATION

PASSWORD

Economy stuck on Imploded

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Economy stuck on Imploded

Postby Ruslavi » Mon May 16, 2011 3:08 pm

So about a month ago my economy went to imploded?! I have been forgetting about the rest of the criteria and simply focus on economy, but I still can't bring myself out. Is it even possible? Like recently today, I accepted a position on increasing the payment for retail workers.

User avatar
Ballotonia
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5487
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ballotonia » Mon May 16, 2011 3:36 pm

Ruslavi wrote:So about a month ago my economy went to imploded?! I have been forgetting about the rest of the criteria and simply focus on economy, but I still can't bring myself out. Is it even possible? Like recently today, I accepted a position on increasing the payment for retail workers.


Your population is 20 million, so your nation hasn't even existed for a whole month... Give it some time. For one, increase Economic Freedom.

Ballotonia
"Een volk dat voor tirannen zwicht zal meer dan lijf en goed verliezen, dan dooft het licht…" -- H.M. van Randwijk

User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruslavi » Mon May 16, 2011 3:41 pm

How would I increase economic freedom?

User avatar
Fongbai
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 185
Founded: Jan 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Fongbai » Mon May 16, 2011 3:43 pm

give corporations everything they want
Our Emperor 张苍龙 is A Boss! All Hail The Emperor!

My political compass
Economic Left/Right: 6.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 7.08

Map of Fongbai and other 3rd Corner Nation:
Map of 3rd Corner


Capital City Xibai:

User avatar
Rightful Revolution
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1643
Founded: Jan 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Rightful Revolution » Mon May 16, 2011 3:47 pm

With every issue focus on the economically benefical one
Pro: Hillary Clinton, Liberalism, Socialism, Gay rights, Woman rights, Regulation, Separation of Church and State, Unitarianism, United Nations, Trans-National Unions, European Union, African Union, Technology, Space, Progressive, Green Movement, TransHumanism, Humanism.

User avatar
Globexanter
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6351
Founded: Aug 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Globexanter » Mon May 16, 2011 3:48 pm

You seem to be a Communist state, no?
Because any way to make your Economy better will require minor introductions of, well, Capitalism (answering issues giving companies more rights, allowing them to fire people more easily, etc...).

User avatar
Aescentia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1054
Founded: Feb 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Aescentia » Mon May 16, 2011 4:47 pm

NS is a bit biased against socialist/Communist nations. Just start introducing elements of capitalism in your issue-answerin' and your economy will be back up in no time.

Also, 750 posts! 8)
The Archregimancy wrote:Back to dirty, perverted, shameful sex, please.
Ardchoille wrote:Get back to the tits and boobies, you lot!
NERVUN wrote:I am NERV thy MOD. Thou shalt have no other gods before us.
Reppy wrote:Because fun is fun
Stew cranberries like apples
Tastes much more like prunes

I RP under the nation the City of Vauxhall, mid-PMT. ~~ The One Time I was Ever Reported
Handy Links: GE&T Help Desk ~~ Storefront Creation Guide ~~ NSBBB ~~ NSDossier ~~ French Motto Clinic ~~ Technical FAQ ~~ Le Fil Français

User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Panageadom » Tue May 17, 2011 7:37 am

Did you know the NS right says precisely the opposite? =P
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise

User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruslavi » Tue May 17, 2011 11:41 am

But lets say if I put some funding in defense or cloning does that increase, do nothing to, or decrease my economy. Logically I'll think that funding military to make weapons increase the economy because that creates jobs. But what does it actually do to the economy?

User avatar
Globexanter
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6351
Founded: Aug 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Globexanter » Tue May 17, 2011 11:43 am

Ruslavi wrote:But lets say if I put some funding in defense or cloning does that increase, do nothing to, or decrease my economy. Logically I'll think that funding military to make weapons increase the economy because that creates jobs. But what does it actually do to the economy?


Armies don't produce anything (except War). But as mentioned before, NS acts weirdly when it comes to issues, so it is the "luck of the dip".

User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruslavi » Tue May 17, 2011 11:44 am

And what about union strikes I recently said yes for 20% increase for retail workers. Did that increase my economy? Because it is still on imploded

User avatar
Gallade
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53324
Founded: Jul 14, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Gallade » Tue May 17, 2011 11:51 am

Ruslavi wrote:And what about union strikes I recently said yes for 20% increase for retail workers. Did that increase my economy? Because it is still on imploded

Don't give anything to employees. Keep opting for the CEOs and corporations.
|| Miss me with that factional BS || RIP Dyakovo. You were a true friend, you will be forever missed. ||

Français, en guerriers magnanimes, portez ou retenez vos coups! Épargnez ces tristes victimes à regret s'armant contre nous
My TG box is for friends, not food
Feel like making a direct change rather than just bickering over crises?
Help give orphaned children a safe environment to grow
Combat Homelessness

User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruslavi » Tue May 17, 2011 11:52 am

How bad would that hurt my civil rights?

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue May 17, 2011 11:52 am

Ruslavi wrote:I have been forgetting about the rest of the criteria and simply focus on economy, but I still can't bring myself out. Is it even possible? Like recently today, I accepted a position on increasing the payment for retail workers.

I looked at your NS pace, and it does not seem like so:
32 minutes ago: Following new legislation in Ruslavi, military spending is on the increase.
66 minutes ago: Ruslavi lodged a message on the World Congress Regional Message Board.
12 hours ago: Following new legislation in Ruslavi, the nation is ravaged by daily union strikes.
1 day ago: Following new legislation in Ruslavi, it is illegal to make racist remarks in public.
3 days ago: Following new legislation in Ruslavi, the government is cutting back on the number of political prisoners executed each year.
3 days 12 hours ago: Following new legislation in Ruslavi, a well-funded social safety net protects the unfortunate.

Those two list on the worst thing you can do for the economy. You have gota give companies more freedom (ie. freedom to fire workers, freedom to exploit environment, etc while abolishing welfare).
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruslavi » Tue May 17, 2011 11:56 am

But the last one on the list was an issue on not being a corrupt dictatorship anymore and I dont want to be so I accepted it. And it lied to me because I am still a corrupt dictatorship

User avatar
Globexanter
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6351
Founded: Aug 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Globexanter » Tue May 17, 2011 11:57 am

Ruslavi wrote:But the last one on the list was an issue on not being a corrupt dictatorship anymore and I dont want to be so I accepted it. And it lied to me because I am still a corrupt dictatorship


Never, ever ever expect Issues to work out exactly how you wanted them too.

User avatar
Osberg-Thitania
Envoy
 
Posts: 203
Founded: Jan 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Osberg-Thitania » Tue May 17, 2011 11:58 am

Ruslavi wrote:And what about union strikes I recently said yes for 20% increase for retail workers. Did that increase my economy? Because it is still on imploded


No, it would decrease it. Bear in mind that this marker is not your economy, but your economic freedoms. Generally, when you answer a issue in a way that favors the workers, it decreases, when you answer in a way that favor the companies, it increases. There are some issues about subsidizing industries, that increase your economy at the cost of increasing your taxes, but without penalizing the workers. If you want to stay communist, i would recomend to wait till you get any issue like this.

User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruslavi » Tue May 17, 2011 12:01 pm

So I should dismiss every issue until I get that one?

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue May 17, 2011 12:02 pm

Ruslavi wrote:But the last one on the list was an issue on not being a corrupt dictatorship anymore and I dont want to be so I accepted it.

However, I would suggest focusing one thing at time. Look at mine, while it never dipped below "good", it started from "good" and went up to "frightening". However during that time, my political freedom was almost none and civil rights was also not too good. "Corrupt dictatorship", goes away after you have a very good economy (there may be other way to do it, but it is one of the ways). Then after economy gets stable, rest can be improved to level you want.

And it lied to me because I am still a corrupt dictatorship

Welcome to NS. Issues say one thing and do other.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Ruslavi
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: May 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruslavi » Tue May 17, 2011 12:07 pm

Thanks so I will keep increasing my economy, however, I want to stay communist. Is there a way to do both of them?

User avatar
Globexanter
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6351
Founded: Aug 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Globexanter » Tue May 17, 2011 12:09 pm

Ruslavi wrote:Thanks so I will keep increasing my economy, however, I want to stay communist. Is there a way to do both of them?


You've got to easy a tiny bit of Capitalism into your Nation, it is the only way. Unless you get the Gold Deposit Issue. Then take it all for your govt ;)

User avatar
Osberg-Thitania
Envoy
 
Posts: 203
Founded: Jan 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Osberg-Thitania » Tue May 17, 2011 1:22 pm

Ruslavi wrote:So I should dismiss every issue until I get that one?


No, that would remove all the fun of the game! ;)

Also, don´ge too obsesed with the economy. A contry of my region has "imploded" economy, but consistently scores first place in longest lifespan and happiest citizens.

User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Panageadom » Tue May 17, 2011 1:25 pm

No, you don't.

NS will let you be as authoritarian economically as you like, as long as you manage to run your centralised economy as effeciently as possible. Naturally, that's very difficult, especially given that your present responses don't seem to bely a basic understand of economic sense.

As a quick response to what has been said.

Military spending doesn't not grow the economy - in fact, by producing nothing for a lot of investment, it's a sure way to harm it.

Creating jobs is often detrimental to the overall status of the economy (although more in capitalist economies [where the sensible jobs have all been created] than in communist ones [where the government may suffer equally from under- and over-job creation]) - after all, by the logic that jobs are good, you would pay everyone to dig holes and then fill them in again (if you get the option to force your citizens to consume goods - "compulsory consumerism" - it's flawed for similar reasons).

Subsidies and tariffs, as well as bending over backwards to large corporate entities, are often bad for the economy by distorting the nature of competition. That said, NS doesn't always understand this pretty fundamental idea, and in a system with no competition (i.e. communism), I have little idea what the results would be.

As a basic principle, you want to have the most people producing the most goods that people want to consume - i.e. creating the most value/redistributing the most utility - to grow your economy. Unfortunately, without markets, you haven't a clue whether you actually are doing this!

EDIT: Post above me is symptomatic of NS misunderstanding of the nature of starvation. :P
Last edited by Panageadom on Tue May 17, 2011 1:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise

User avatar
Aethrys
Minister
 
Posts: 2714
Founded: Apr 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Aethrys » Tue May 17, 2011 1:34 pm

I am communist, or at least strongly anti-business, and things seem to be working out pretty well for my economy. And I didn't have to erradicate the environment, either.
"Concentration of power in a political machine is bad; and an Established Church is only a political machine; it was invented for that; it is nursed, cradled, preserved for that; it is an enemy to human liberty, and does no good which it could not better do in a split-up and scattered condition." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Fongbai
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 185
Founded: Jan 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Fongbai » Tue May 17, 2011 3:01 pm

Aethrys wrote:I am communist, or at least strongly anti-business, and things seem to be working out pretty well for my economy. And I didn't have to erradicate the environment, either.

Check Draweigon out, powerhouse economy but very public secttored. To get there though, you have to cheat by using Capitalism first since theres no way to make it anti-business without leading to a weak economy.
Our Emperor 张苍龙 is A Boss! All Hail The Emperor!

My political compass
Economic Left/Right: 6.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 7.08

Map of Fongbai and other 3rd Corner Nation:
Map of 3rd Corner


Capital City Xibai:

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ROLASS

Advertisement

Remove ads