NATION

PASSWORD

Submitted: "Tourism Tanking!" tells tabloids

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Submitted: "Tourism Tanking!" tells tabloids

Postby Panageadom » Wed Apr 06, 2011 6:51 am

While I appreciate it's not great form to have to issue drafts on the forum at the same time, I won't have access to NS for a bit and would like criticism to accrue over that period.

Anyhoo...

Name: "Tourism Tanking!" tells tabloids

Description: Following an public safety disaster of unimaginable magnitude - so extreme that members of your government only mention it in hushed voices, and only then in the vaguest of terms - @@NAME@@'s tourism industry has hit the rocks. Commentators from all walks of your life have come to your office to offer their opinion on what they obviously feel is a crucial issue.

Validity: Valid for all nations with some form of tourism industry.

[option] "The government has to step in and do something, for once!" states tour operator, @@RANDOMNAME@@, visibly pulling their hair out, "If we'd had proper rails on the marina, that shark would never have gotten into the reactor in the first place! The government has to put better regulations in place to make sure disasters of this kind never happen again - and if we want to coax back the tourists we've lost, the taxpayer's going to have to be prepared to shell out for a whole bunch of new state-subsidised hotels, parks and tourist attractions. Shark-proof ones. Our economy will never survive without it!"
[effect] a new generation of aquariumless hotels are being built on @@NAME@@'s beaches under government supervision
[stats] taxes rise, commerce spending rises, infrastructure and environmental spending rise slightly, environmental quality rises, economy contracts slightly, tourism industry grows, most avoided falls, safest rises, economic freedoms fall slightly, corruption rises very slightly

[option] "Why waste more money?" grumbles middle-aged industrialist, @@RANDOMNAME@@, chomping on a fat cigar, "Look. I'm as sorry as the next schmuck for those poor noseless meteorologists. But we've got to realise that tourism is just not @@NAME@@'s strong suit; and that's not going to change, no matter how many wallets we throw at the problem. Hell, if the government really wanted to do something to fix our economy, it'd be to give everyone a healthy tax-cut and get rid of some of that environmental legislation - set up for the benefit of a bunch of tree-hugging foreigners, I might add - that stops me ever doing anything useful with my factories."
[effect] tourists visiting @@NAME@@ weep as forests are ploughed down and dug up for raw materials
[stats] taxes fall, environmental spending falls, economy grows, tourism industry is almost destroyed, but uranium mining and woodchipping industries grow, environmental quality falls drastically, most avoided rises slightly, economic freedoms rise

[option] "I thin' I've got another solution to this problem," says shady government advisor, @@RANDOMNAME@@, lazing by the pool of one of @@NAME@@'s classiest hotels, "Now, we're not goin' to be able to hide the fact that @@CAPITAL@@ is now covered in pink icing, but...what if the inspectors an' tour guides an' all those types of folks just didn't notice all that mess? After all, we don't have the money to clear it all up, but I think we do have just about enough to dangle a few @@CURRENCY@@s in front of anyone who wants to give our nation a good review. After all, a few firm golden handshakes never hurt no-one."
[effect] @@NAME@@ seems to have no redeeming features bar the swathe of suspiciously positive tourist reports written about the country
[stats] taxes rise slightly, corruption rises, tourism industry grows slightly, most avoided falls slightly, economy grows slightly
Last edited by Panageadom on Sat May 07, 2011 6:00 am, edited 3 times in total.
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:23 am

Issue drafts can really become buried on this forum rather quickly these days.

As always, you have a good idea here. There aren't too many issues that deal with tourism. Just a few suggestions/complaints:

Option 1: Hm, The economy should decrease only slightly, if at all. While the taxpayers do suffer in the short run, the economy will benefit in the long run due to an increase of tourism and tourists pouring money into the nation's economy.

Option 2: Wouldn't corruption rise slightly? It seems like the environment will end up suffering because of a backroom deal between government officials and some sleazy corporate types.

Option 3: With the increased revue, however small it is, wouldn't the economy and possibly the environment increase slightly? Or would it be offset by the paid reviews?
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Panageadom » Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:25 am

Nation of Quebec wrote:Issue drafts can really become buried on this forum rather quickly these days.

As always, you have a good idea here. There aren't too many issues that deal with tourism. Just a few suggestions/complaints:

Option 1: Hm, The economy should decrease only slightly, if at all. While the taxpayers do suffer in the short run, the economy will benefit in the long run due to an increase of tourism and tourists pouring money into the nation's economy. (1)

Option 2: Wouldn't corruption rise slightly? (2) It seems like the environment will end up suffering because of a backroom deal between government officials and some sleazy corporate types.

Option 3: With the increased revue, however small it is, wouldn't the economy (3) and possibly the environment (4) increase slightly? Or would it be offset by the paid reviews?


1: No...I think that falls to the fallacy that the government can pick economic winners...

2: Perhaps. I'll have a think about that. But given that this guy is actually arguing for a reduction in the scope of government, it seems unlikely that he could find the cash for some corruption on the side. After all, not all industrialists are inherently evil.

3: Yes - changed.

4: No, it wouldn't. If you can bribe people to say "what a nice environment you have", you lose any political/economic incentive to make it nice.
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise

User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Panageadom » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:55 pm

Should the lack of comments on this be taken as a measure of it's unimplementability or tacit support?
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise

User avatar
Georgism
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9940
Founded: Mar 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Georgism » Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:56 am

I kinda like it.
Georgism Factbook (including questions and answers)
¯\(°_o)/¯
Horsefish wrote:I agree with George

User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Panageadom » Sat Apr 30, 2011 4:59 am

Thank you.
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise

User avatar
Nation of Quebec
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8217
Founded: Jan 19, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Nation of Quebec » Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:12 am

I would actually say that this issue if ready to go, pending any further criticisms. I have none.
Canadian, Left-of-Center, Cynic
Proud Atheist and Geek
All WA matters are handled by my WA puppet state of Velkia and the Islands
Please don't send me unsolicited telegrams.

User avatar
Aescentia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1054
Founded: Feb 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Aescentia » Sun May 01, 2011 9:50 pm

Very well done, and there's no spelling or grammar issues. :)
The Archregimancy wrote:Back to dirty, perverted, shameful sex, please.
Ardchoille wrote:Get back to the tits and boobies, you lot!
NERVUN wrote:I am NERV thy MOD. Thou shalt have no other gods before us.
Reppy wrote:Because fun is fun
Stew cranberries like apples
Tastes much more like prunes

I RP under the nation the City of Vauxhall, mid-PMT. ~~ The One Time I was Ever Reported
Handy Links: GE&T Help Desk ~~ Storefront Creation Guide ~~ NSBBB ~~ NSDossier ~~ French Motto Clinic ~~ Technical FAQ ~~ Le Fil Français

User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Panageadom » Mon May 02, 2011 4:16 am

Good!
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise

User avatar
Mostly armless
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 355
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mostly armless » Mon May 02, 2011 4:40 am

'Plouged' should be 'ploughed'.
On the song 'Respect and Obey Authority' -
MoonarEclipse - 'Worse than Justin Beiber! How is that possible?'
Zephie wrote:The ultimate threat to America is arguing about its problems on the internet instead of taking action IRL.

Ashmoria wrote:one wonders how successful a camp full of gay boys can possibly BE in convincing them not to ...... become romantically involved with each other.

Old Erisia wrote:Obviously a conspiracy...
... And it succeeded, so that rules out the CIA...

Hydesland wrote:Do the lib dems actually exist, or have they been a figment of middle class imagination for the last few years?

User avatar
Panageadom
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: May 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Panageadom » Mon May 02, 2011 4:59 am

Fixed. Thanks.
Author of Issues:
#273: Is our children learning?
#310: Too Little Talk?
#315: Creative Flowers Withering Under Legislation
#324 "Tourism Tanking" Tells Tabloids
#334: Blot Out Bauhaus
#340: Defending Patent Pending
#365: A Busload of Worry

None at present

If I offer criticism on your proposed issue, I will often write in red: don't think I'm being aggressive, it's just a convention I use!
If I ask a question on a proposed issue thread, then it's because I feel it's one you need to ask of your issue: I'm being Socratic and/or lazy.


Supreme Court Chief Justice for Capitalist Paradise


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads