NATION

PASSWORD

Help with #248, "The Sky is Falling," Please?

A place to spoil daily issues for those who haven't had them yet, snigger at typos, and discuss ideas for new ones.
User avatar
Bozepolis
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Mar 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Help with #248, "The Sky is Falling," Please?

Postby Bozepolis » Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:01 pm

This one
#248: The Sky Is Falling [Freedomstaki; ed:Sirocco]

The Issue
A particularly bad spate of bombings, hijackings and snake attacks aboard airline flights has crippled the air travel industry in @@NAME@@. The government has convened to discuss possible ways of improving airport security.

The Debate
1. "It's a no-brainer," says @@RANDOMNAME@@, frisking you as you enter the meeting. "Put police officers on every flight, armed and ready to deal with those blasted sky pirates! It's deterrence and protection wrapped up in one. If anyone so much as says the word 'bomb' they'd better watch out!"

2. "You want to put people with GUNS on aeroplanes?!" asks @@RANDOMNAME@@, a security guard at @@RANDOMNAME@@ International Airport. "And at the taxpayers' expense to boot? For the love of Violet, keep the police out of this! Airport security should remain in private hands! Think realistically for a moment: government priorities change all the time but companies are in it for profit. Bombings are BAD for business! We don't LET them happen! So just... butt out will you? I'm not losing my job to a flatfoot!"

3. "We don't need no copper protectin' us! We can look after our own hides!" laughs @@RANDOMNAME@@, president of the @@CAPITAL@@ Rifle and Revolver Association. "Air flight passengers should be allowed to carry concealed weapons. If one of them terrorists thinks he's gonna walk all over @@NAME@@ like he owns the place then he's got another thing coming, ha!"

4. "I only wanted to tour @@REGION@@ for a few w-weeks," wails @@RANDOMNAME@@, recovering from a particularly vigourous strip search. "I have a right not to be probed and prodded at the whim of some wand-waving monkey with a high school education! For a whole HOUR I might add! They treat us like cattle! In the name of DECENCY, I request, nay DEMAND an end to the disgrace that is airport security! I mean, really, it's like they don't trust me or something!"


5. "Let's just ban all planes!" shouts @@RANDOMNAME@@, prodding you angrily in the chest. "Bombings and terrorist attacks aren't the only problems these things cause! The aeroplane is one of the worst pollutants mankind has ever created! They're loud, they're ugly, and they burn fuel like there's no tomorrow! There are more environment-friendly ways to travel than by plane even if they are slower! Much slower. But cleaner!"


The thing is, when I look at Nos. 3 and 4, they look exactly the same to me. Though the two people saying them are obviously have different tendentions, the effect of what they're proposing seems exactly the same.
Does anybody know, what's the difference between 3 and 4?

And if you've seen questions I've asked about issues in the past, my goal, at present, is still the same - raise civil rights at all costs.
Thank you.

User avatar
Maroza
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1915
Founded: Jan 28, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Maroza » Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:32 pm

Number 3 would increase it more because people are carrying guns on air planes.
Current level 5: Peacetime
Find a Helmet
Put on a Helmet


Find me someone who does not support the revolutionary sciences and the technology of peace and they will be shot as traitors to the revolution.~Aethrys
The disease first struck a wealthy nation with low population density, an adequate health care system and naturally declining population.

User avatar
Bozepolis
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Mar 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Bozepolis » Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:39 pm

Maroza wrote:Number 3 would increase it more because people are carrying guns on air planes.


It doesn't mean that they're going to be required to carry guns though, does it? You know how the effects are always exaggerated, so are you sure it won't be just as bad for civil rights, but from the other side?

EDIT: I mean to require folks carry guns is just as bad as to forbid them to carry guns, and that's what I'm afraid might happen if I choose 3. See?
Last edited by Bozepolis on Thu Mar 31, 2011 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Maroza
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1915
Founded: Jan 28, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Maroza » Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:11 pm

No just allow. The issue doesn't say anything about making it mandatory.
Current level 5: Peacetime
Find a Helmet
Put on a Helmet


Find me someone who does not support the revolutionary sciences and the technology of peace and they will be shot as traitors to the revolution.~Aethrys
The disease first struck a wealthy nation with low population density, an adequate health care system and naturally declining population.

User avatar
Bozepolis
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 58
Founded: Mar 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Bozepolis » Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:47 pm

Maroza wrote:No just allow. The issue doesn't say anything about making it mandatory.


It worked! Civil rights went up only one point, but it was enough to get them from "excellent" to "superb."
Thanks for the advice.


Return to Got Issues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads