by Shwe Tu Colony » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:53 pm
by Shwe Tu Colony » Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:24 pm
by Fauxia » Wed Feb 28, 2018 4:50 pm
by Shwe Tu Colony » Tue Mar 06, 2018 11:44 pm
by Shwe Tu Colony » Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:48 pm
by Chan Island » Sat Mar 17, 2018 1:37 am
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.
by Shwe Tu Colony » Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:14 pm
Chan Island wrote:In option 3, I'd change the phrase from "powerful federal governments' to 'powerful central government'.
by Jutsa » Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:49 pm
The Issue:Hmm... this is an interesting problem, but I also have to wonder: What about cities/towns trying to annex each other?unincorporated territory of "The Stripe," an area known for its economic prosperity
It might work better, since I find it surprising an unincorporated territory's prospering so well — especially if your nation has a state-run economy."but their endeavors are at a standstill" doesn't really flow with the rest of the sentence, I'm afraid.However, the residents there are attempting to resist this annexation by applying for township, but their endeavors are at a standstill.
What about ", leading there to be a hostile standstill that managed to make its way into your office"?
Option 1:Could also be phrased as "cities fight one another to expand their territories". Small nit-pick, otherwise nice option.cities often fight one another to annex prosperous unincorporated territories
Option 2:Doesn't work very well for highly state-run nations.some commie leaderHmm... doesn't seem very... interesting.Fallout 2: unregulated businesses in the town of The Stripe prosper next to a city falling deeper into debt
What about "economically prosperous villages leave cities to crumble for personal gain" or something?
by Australian rePublic » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:04 pm
by Shwe Tu Colony » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:10 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:Validity- Devolution
Also, what's the name of the city which wants to annex "The Strip"
by Shwe Tu Colony » Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:19 pm
by Fauxia » Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:34 pm
by Shwe Tu Colony » Sat Mar 24, 2018 10:51 pm
by Shwe Tu Colony » Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:25 pm
by Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Apr 03, 2018 2:15 am
Validity: Must have devolution policy, must be capitalist
Description: In an attempt to curb his city's rising debt, Mayor Bernie Craigen attempted to annex the neighboring unincorporated territory of "The Stripe,"
an area known for its economic prosperity due to its many businesses and hotels, which border a major road.
However, the residents there are attempting to resist this annexation by applying for township,
eventually leading to a hostile standstill that made its way to your office.
by Shwe Tu Colony » Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:18 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Can we clarify the means of annexation? Is he seizing the area by force, or is he politically declaring it to be part of his jurisdiction?
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Why does applying for township resist annexation?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Tue Apr 17, 2018 10:44 am
by Shwe Tu Colony » Mon Apr 30, 2018 9:04 pm
by Candlewhisper Archive » Tue May 01, 2018 1:51 am
Description: In an attempt to curb his city's rising debt, Mayor Bernie Craigen attempted to politically annex the neighboring unincorporated territory of "The Stripe," an area known for its economic prosperity .... However, the residents there are attempting to resist this annexation by applying for township, which would make it far more difficult for them to be annex.
by Shwe Tu Colony » Wed May 16, 2018 10:55 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:
I still don't get the basis of this. How can someone just declare that an area outside of their assigned territory is now theirs? Does any such legal mechanism like this exist in real life?
Doesn't the word "annex" in itself imply illegal occupation and control?
by Ab Humanitatis Scientiam » Thu May 17, 2018 4:33 pm
EDIT: the draft already includes devolution as a policy requirement. Also removed references to unitary vs. federal government, since that doesn't really seem relevant. Rather, the existence of "unincorporated areas" seems to hinge on traditions and practices concerning the number of "levels" of "local government." Those living in places with traditions and practices involving multiple levels of "local government" (as in the UK, for example), and wherein every square inch of the country is always inside one of those levels, will probably find the above alien. By contrast, I live in the United States, where "local government" very specifically means "municipal corporation" which may or may not exist in a particular place at a particular point in time.
So naturally the UK system appears extremely confusing and alien to me.
by Ab Humanitatis Scientiam » Thu May 17, 2018 5:06 pm
by Shwe Tu Colony » Thu May 17, 2018 5:07 pm
Ab Humanitatis Scientiam wrote:I would recommend reworking the issue to completely eliminate the "town," and just have the mayor of a city trying to take over a totally unincorporated area.
by Ab Humanitatis Scientiam » Thu May 17, 2018 5:16 pm
Shwe Tu Colony wrote:Ab Humanitatis Scientiam wrote:I would recommend reworking the issue to completely eliminate the "town," and just have the mayor of a city trying to take over a totally unincorporated area.
" Mayor Bernie Craigen attempted to politically annex the neighboring unincorporated territory"
It's referred to as an "unincorporated territory" already.
Description: In an attempt to curb his city's rising debt, Mayor Bernie Craigen attempted to politically annex the neighboring unincorporated territory of "The Stripe," an area known for its economic prosperity .... However, the residents there are attempting to resist this annexation by applying for township,
Ab Humanitatis Scientiam wrote:So I'd recommend reworking the issue to completely eliminate the "town," and just have the mayor of a city trying to take over a totally unincorporated area. Presuming that #111.1 institutes the Devolution policy, perhaps add high political freedom as an additional validity, then have the issue frame assume that one devolved area went a little far and completely abolished its local government. Then pit that area against a neighbor in some sort of dispute.
by Shwe Tu Colony » Thu May 17, 2018 5:19 pm
Ab Humanitatis Scientiam wrote:Description: In an attempt to curb his city's rising debt, Mayor Bernie Craigen attempted to politically annex the neighboring unincorporated territory of "The Stripe," an area known for its economic prosperity .... However, the residents there are attempting to resist this annexation by applying for township,
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement