Advertisement
by Drachmaland » Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:39 am
by Sanctaria » Tue Jan 05, 2016 4:09 am
by Drachmaland » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:12 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:55 am
by Drachmaland » Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:23 am
Trotterdam wrote:Perhaps if divorce or adultery were previously illegal?
Bears Armed wrote:Perhaps if state-organised marriages were previously mandatory?
by Aculea » Wed Jan 06, 2016 4:17 pm
Drachmaland wrote:Anyhow, this case also includes a specific value (namely a +5 increase in Civil Rights), which can only imply that the people who want not to get married in a pre-arranged way or to commit adultery are way much more significant in numbers compared to the people wishing to just get married, no?
by Aibohphobia » Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:37 am
by Sanctaria » Mon Jan 11, 2016 12:38 am
Aibohphobia wrote:May I suggest reclassifying this issue as an Easter Egg? Seems a bit strange getting it more than once. It's also more of a fun plot with almost unexpected results, similar to the onewhere you choose your favourite colour.
by Aibohphobia » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:06 am
I insist that we establish a Aibohphobian Arts Council
by Aculea » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:18 am
by Luna Amore » Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:29 am
Aculea wrote:I have issue #082 AI Researchers Rally For Android Rights in my box right now. If I choose option 3 to ban AI, is it going to be affected by my previously choosing in #472: Rise Of The Machines to let AIs run my economy? You don't actually have to answer that, just throwing it out there in case it wasn't considered.
by Celseon » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:17 pm
"This is sick and wrong!" vents trilby-clad protester George W. Han, flinging a copy of a news article strategically between you and your meal. "How can people think that mutilating diaper parts is okay? Religions and cults be damned. As you can read in this editorial, the paper's resident doctor proves beyond doubt that non-necessary circumcision has a host of negative effects. It doesn't matter that they're a doctor of journalism and not urology; it's basically the same thing. Bar emergency medical reasons, you must make circumcision illegal in all circumstances."
by Sanctaria » Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:40 pm
Celseon wrote:Issue 467: "Saving Your Own Foreskin"
Option 1"This is sick and wrong!" vents trilby-clad protester George W. Han, flinging a copy of a news article strategically between you and your meal. "How can people think that mutilating diaper parts is okay? Religions and cults be damned. As you can read in this editorial, the paper's resident doctor proves beyond doubt that non-necessary circumcision has a host of negative effects. It doesn't matter that they're a doctor of journalism and not urology; it's basically the same thing. Bar emergency medical reasons, you must make circumcision illegal in all circumstances."
"Bar" indicated in red text should be "Barring", shouldn't it?
by King Nephmir II » Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:21 am
by Trotterdam » Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:51 am
by Aculea » Wed Jan 13, 2016 12:12 pm
by United States of Natan » Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:15 pm
Then it's a lie. Everything Fox News says is a lie.
Even true things once said on Fox News become lies.
(Family Guy: Excellence in Broadcasting)
by Luna Amore » Wed Jan 13, 2016 1:26 pm
United States of Natan wrote:The issue "quickie Marriages Under Scrutiny" has a typo; "license" is spelled wrong. The issue spells it as "licence".
by Christian Democrats » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:35 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Luna Amore » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:41 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:As two players have pointed out in the spoilers thread, Issue #480, Option 2 should say "whom" instead of "who."
by Sucrati » Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:38 pm
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: ROLASS
Advertisement