A Information Technology tycoon
should be "An"
this monument will ensue
"ensure"
Advertisement
by Aibohphobia » Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:10 pm
A Information Technology tycoon
this monument will ensue
by Luna Amore » Fri Oct 30, 2015 11:14 pm
by Trotterdam » Sat Oct 31, 2015 12:38 pm
by Christian Democrats » Wed Nov 04, 2015 3:23 am
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Luna Amore » Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:20 am
Trotterdam wrote:Doesn't the game have an intelligent "a"/"an" macro now? I recall seeing something like that in the effect line for option 3 of issue #120.
by Christian Democrats » Wed Nov 04, 2015 3:57 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Sanctaria » Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:31 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:Issue #217
The CDNHS (Christian Democrats National Health Service) is struggling to pay for the medicinal and surgical treatments required for your citizens.
I think you ought to consider using the adjective macro here (i.e., Christian Democratic instead of Christian Democrats).
by The Chan Islanders » Thu Nov 05, 2015 4:47 pm
A a Chan Islander drone strike in the hinterlands of Tasmania has successfully killed an infamous terrorist, Mad Max, notorious for assassinating your predecessor. However, collateral damage butchered dozens of innocent bystanders, outraging the international community.
by Phydios » Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:18 pm
The Chan Islanders wrote:In issue 386 "Droning on and on"A a Chan Islander drone strike in the hinterlands of Tasmania has successfully killed an infamous terrorist, Mad Max, notorious for assassinating your predecessor. However, collateral damage butchered dozens of innocent bystanders, outraging the international community.
Problem highlighted in red.
If you claim to be religious but don’t control your tongue, you are fooling yourself, and your religion is worthless. Pure and genuine religion in the sight of God the Father means caring for orphans and widows in their distress and refusing to let the world corrupt you. | Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter. On judgment day many will say to me, ‘Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.’ But I will reply, ‘I never knew you. Get away from me, you who break God’s laws.’James 1:26-27, Matthew 7:21-23
by The Chan Islanders » Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:55 pm
Phydios wrote:
Not an error; a bad custom field. The issue is using your denonym adjective, which is a custom field. For example, mine is "Phydiosian". Yours, as your nation's page shows, is "a Chan Islander". That "a" at the beginning, as you can see, does not look good when the denonym is used in a sentence.
by Tawgania » Fri Nov 06, 2015 2:51 am
by Tharse » Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:04 pm
by Luna Amore » Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:16 pm
Tharse wrote:I don't know if this is really an issue bug, but issue 457 is kind of strange in that it assumes that it assumes your nation has a history of colonialism. (I was confused until I read the third option and realized that "native Tharsis" were a minority group and not the population of my nation.) Maybe this should be limited based on what history you picked for your nation when you created it?
by Oiseau » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:41 pm
by Trotterdam » Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:00 pm
by Christian Democrats » Sun Nov 15, 2015 9:55 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Trackeendy » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:17 pm
by Sanctaria » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:18 pm
Trackeendy wrote:The second choice for the breastmilk issue (Can't think of what its called) has this as the end result: "breast milk is being redistributed from each according to their ability to each according to their need". Obviously the wording needs to be fixed here.
by Trotterdam » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:28 pm
by Trackeendy » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:52 pm
by Trackeendy » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:53 pm
by Trackeendy » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:57 pm
by Frisbeeteria » Tue Nov 17, 2015 5:25 pm
Trackeendy wrote:How? it seems like its two different sentences crammed into one. How can you read that and not find it odd?
by Trackeendy » Tue Nov 17, 2015 5:48 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Klaus Devestatorie, Opiachus
Advertisement