I love how this reads as an implicit admission that no, defenders do not care about TNP's natives, but that it's ok because "no u". Which, looks bad for people claiming to have moral high ground, surely you can realise that?
Advertisement
by Timiskrane » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:23 pm
by Mlakhavia » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:23 pm
by Qvait » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:25 pm
Wascoitan wrote:
believe it or not, people can disagree with the assertion that hulldom is a traitor while still thinking that TSP did a bad. those two are very much not mutually exclusive.
by Wascoitan » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:26 pm
Qvait wrote:Wascoitan wrote:believe it or not, people can disagree with the assertion that hulldom is a traitor while still thinking that TSP did a bad. those two are very much not mutually exclusive.
You're conveniently glossing over the fact that Ghost said "good riddance" to TNP's embassy with LWU.
by Francois Isidore » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:27 pm
Qvait wrote:Seems to me that it's Robes and a handful of people crying about it, hysterically even. Ghost and others seem to disagree. They are more than welcome to correct me if my observations here are wrong.
by Orcuo » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:27 pm
by Evil Wolf » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:28 pm
Ostrovskiy wrote:Suddenly raiders care about native populations because it makes defenders look bad
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Desperation » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:32 pm
I think the primary issue is that TNP and LWU don't believe it was a mutual decision for TNP & defenders to stop collaboration, but rather defenders said they'd vote against upcoming TNP commends if TNP didn't vote against the condemn. In other words, not saying "we may decide to not auto-vote for your stuff and we may consider other factors" but rather "we will explicitly fail your stuff for the sole reason of you not listening to us"Weed wrote:O.o
As much as I love being outraged at stuff, telling someone you would be willing to vote a way they want on one issue, if they vote a way you want on another issue is not a threat. It's a potential deal. Accepting the deal is not backing down in the face of pressure, it is making a priority call on if you care more about what you are getting than giving up.
Closing an embassy over a vote is also not a threat, but closer to a threat than just offering X for Y.
by Wascoitan » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:33 pm
Qvait wrote:Wascoitan wrote:that also does not in fact mean ghost thinks that what yall did was good, merely that ghost dislikes LWU, a fact which should shock exactly zero people.
Well, then it should shock zero people about Wym's ideology-driven agenda against defenders and his resignation carrying zero weight.
by La Xinga » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:33 pm
Our relationships with The North Pacific have been particularly strengthened by military and political cooperation following the repeated attacks on their allies Stargate and Equilism by The Brotherhood of Malice, the leading organization in contemporary raiderdom.
by Qvait » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:34 pm
Francois Isidore wrote:Qvait wrote:Seems to me that it's Robes and a handful of people crying about it, hysterically even. Ghost and others seem to disagree. They are more than welcome to correct me if my observations here are wrong.
Shut up, bruv. I just found out that you can curse on the forums (legitimately didn't know that and if I did then I must've forgotten).
Anyhow, had I known that, my posts earlier could've been worded differently. Basically, I'm not under any obligation to support TNP. Why would I support people who are fucking it up? If they'd stop fucking it up, then maybe I'd support them.
Someone (who I still have no idea who they are) asked me earlier why I continue to attack. It's because I'm tired of playing nice and I'm tired of seeing a region that I put so much time into be reduced to this and left out to be publically mocked.
I'm no more pro-TNP at the moment than I am anti-Hulldom's leadership. As far as I'm concerned, I'm an equal opportunity hater.
by Kranostav » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:37 pm
Weed wrote:O.o
As much as I love being outraged at stuff, telling someone you would be willing to vote a way they want on one issue, if they vote a way you want on another issue is not a threat. It's a potential deal. Accepting the deal is not backing down in the face of pressure, it is making a priority call on if you care more about what you are getting than giving up.
Closing an embassy over a vote is also not a threat, but closer to a threat than just offering X for Y.
by Orcuo » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:37 pm
La Xinga wrote:
I thought TSP's on TNP's side against LWU?Our relationships with The North Pacific have been particularly strengthened by military and political cooperation following the repeated attacks on their allies Stargate and Equilism by The Brotherhood of Malice, the leading organization in contemporary raiderdom.
by Lord Dominator » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:39 pm
Sporaltryus wrote:The Brotherhood of Malice, the leading organization in contemporary raiderdom.
Lone Wolves United represents a direct threat to the sovereignty of all of our regions. LWU was recently at war with both 10000 Islands and The League, both times due to acts of unprovoked aggression with the war only easing due to a decision by defenders to ease up on conflict.
by Evil Wolf » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:39 pm
Qvait wrote:That's fun. I was tired of playing nice a long time ago too, so excuse me if I am equally animated by the bullshit being lobbed against my region by a hostile force that cares little about my region or its relationship with yours.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Valtarre » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:54 pm
Sporaltryus wrote:Our relationships with The North Pacific have been particularly strengthened by military and political cooperation following the repeated attacks on their allies Stargate and Equilism by The Brotherhood of Malice, the leading organization in contemporary raiderdom.
by Reploid Productions » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:56 pm
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Orcuo » Sat Apr 08, 2023 8:58 pm
Reploid Productions wrote:Reminder folks, while tempers are expected to get heated, let's avoid letting your tempers get away from you. Y'all can argue about what happened without the jabs at one another's intelligence or locations of their heads. I'd rather not have to set aside my bucket of popcorn to pick up the banhammer.
by New Temecula » Sat Apr 08, 2023 9:00 pm
Orcuo wrote:Reploid Productions wrote:Reminder folks, while tempers are expected to get heated, let's avoid letting your tempers get away from you. Y'all can argue about what happened without the jabs at one another's intelligence or locations of their heads. I'd rather not have to set aside my bucket of popcorn to pick up the banhammer.
Oooh, can you share some of your popcorn?
by WayNeacTia » Sat Apr 08, 2023 9:02 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Galactic Powers » Sat Apr 08, 2023 9:05 pm
Petroli wrote:What the hell even are the allegations?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Entropan
Advertisement