Few leaders worth their salt are going to
hire a delegate. Not only is it a massive breach of regional security, but it's also a surefire way to lose members. Delegacy is inconsistent by nature- a delegate must ensure that they have the most endorsements in their region. To hire a delegate is to guarantee them that amount of endorsements, which is done by limiting the number of endorsements that anyone else can have. In the case of small regions, they limit the number of endorsements to none- I.E, nobody can have endorsements except for the delegate. This is an outright draconian policy, as it pretty much bans the members from creating and submitting WA proposals (which requires two endorsements,) which would turn away a large portion of potential- and even current - members. Even if members are allowed to have those two endorsements, having
any limitation is not desirable, and will still cause a drop in growth. Furthermore, large regions are
even less likely to hire a delegate, as they have a wide player base. There are many people in these regions, and the vast chances are that one of those people would do a better job than any hired delegate. There's also the possibility that members may not like it if a founder brings in a foreigner as a delegate, and might leave in protest. We must remember the first rule of leadership- "put your members first, lest they abandon you."
Tinhampton wrote:I note that Traden has marked this thread as (CLOSED)... good luck with your future ventures nonetheless
Awwwwww, I wanted to point out more things!