It's whatever you want it to be, mate.
Advertisement
by Nouveau Quebecois » Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:15 pm
by Nouveau Quebecois » Tue Apr 21, 2020 10:56 pm
by Greater New Hispanyoan Empire » Tue Apr 21, 2020 11:06 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Gentlemen!
Our comrades in The New Iron Order has just dropped a brand new Gameplay Thread with our assistance, and it is WONDERFUL. Be sure to check it out and say hello!
by Nouveau Quebecois » Tue Apr 21, 2020 11:09 pm
Greater New Hispanyoan Empire wrote:Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Gentlemen!
Our comrades in The New Iron Order has just dropped a brand new Gameplay Thread with our assistance, and it is WONDERFUL. Be sure to check it out and say hello!
Thank you so much!
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:32 pm
The Tribunus ReviewGood day, NationStates community.
Lately we've had some Farkasfalkan issues crop up on the CCD's thread, and in the interest of not clogging it up, I've decided to take it up here instead.
Firstly, we have the age old assumption that Farkasfalka is "fascist" a region. Luckily, this is a tired trope and we have explanations prepared.The National Socialist Party wrote:I was about to say that Farkasfalka is not fascist because they do not have the fascist tag but apparently they do now, so they have dropped that act. Now, the CCD is not fascist because it is not tagged fascist, how can it be fascist if it is not tagged fascist.
Concurrently, we have the libertarian, monarchist, conservative, and democratic tags amongst others, so this line of thinking is primitive and uninformed, lest we are libertarian democratic fascists.
For the uninformed, Farkasfalka self-identifies as a Monarchical region. Our head of state is the 'Király', which translates to 'King' from Hungarian. We have a Knights round which acts as our armed forces, and governmental positions of both the elected and appointed variety.
Our next issue is a bit more unsavoury, but not any less addressable.Castelia wrote:Well, it didn't say you were doing these things. It states you're being friends with people who do these things, and I'm pretty sure they do exist.Xoriet wrote:Yeah, that would be the Delegate of Farkasfalka who is a Holocaust denier.
Oh sure, some Farkasfalkans may have some unsavoury ideas, but here is where we live up to our libertarian tag; we don't have a thought police. Unlike other regions, who foster machine men with machine minds, we have no 1984-esque dystopian policies that control what you think, feel, and say.
Of course, subtract site rules.
But nevertheless, one of the slogans of our region is to fight both "degeneracy and tyranny for a better world", and we fully intend to live up to our promises. This is a great opportunity for the Government of Farkasfalka to really delve in deep with the issue of Free Speech and the priority role it has in our region; how we truly cherish the freedom of political liberty.
Farkasfalka has a majority religion. Arguably a majority ideology. But never since our founding in 2016 have we even for a moment considered passing legislation that mandates uniformity in our region for either of these principals, and ideological and religious minorities can personally attest to this.
While sure, the RMB debate may get heated, and the regional officers may get tipsy, I am adamant in the values our region holds dear, namely in the liberty of politics, the liberty of religion, and the liberty of thought! And while these core tenants may seem primitive to our counterparts in the mainstream big-company regions, to forever hold this dear is the Farkasfalkan promise to you.
In other news, the Ministry of Culture has went ahead and successfully conducted the awaited media interview with The Fascist German Reich! It is currently being revised by the Farkasfalkan Tribune for production, and is expected to be published in the coming days.
Stay tuned to the Farkasfalka Regional Thread for further updates!Lehet a Farkasfalka Diadal!
by Code 002 » Wed Apr 22, 2020 12:56 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:snip
Code 002 wrote:(Image)
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=38068953
This is literally a lyric from a Neo-Nazi, pro racial separation, song. I won't do it the service of linking it, but it's from a white supremacist album by Paddy Tarleton (SPLC link) & Byron de la Vandal (google him yourself).
plz.
to fight both "degeneracy and tyranny for a better world"
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 1:01 pm
Code 002 wrote:Nouveau Quebecois wrote:snipCode 002 wrote:(Image)
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=38068953
This is literally a lyric from a Neo-Nazi, pro racial separation, song. I won't do it the service of linking it, but it's from a white supremacist album by Paddy Tarleton (SPLC link) & Byron de la Vandal (google him yourself).
plz.Nouveau Quebecois wrote:No, most of my rhetoric is inspired from material. Going back through previous dispatches and posts I make they derive heavily from other material. There's no reason for me not to be honest about that, as anyone who pays close attention already would know.
Now does that mean I condone the actions of Evan James MacCarthy and endorse the songs of Paddy Tarleton? Of course not. Is that quote just as legitimate as the "Hail the Confederation" under it? Of course. Do you follow the "table theory"? That's for my listeners to decide.to fight both "degeneracy and tyranny for a better world"
So, what races are not invited to this better world? Does that question impinge too much on your Freeze Peach?
by Vungar » Wed Apr 22, 2020 2:19 pm
Founder and Király Farkas of Farkasfalka and the Farkas Lovagok
_________ | _________ | _________ | _________ | _________
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Apr 22, 2020 2:27 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 2:40 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Vungar wrote:
We've decided to allow each race it's own nation! Now how about that? It's almost as if different people from different cultures have different values and goals
Ah yes, "Separate but Equal." Truly the peak of the "liberty" you so espouse.
Thanks for making it obvious at least, Founder.
by The Gilded Star » Wed Apr 22, 2020 2:48 pm
Vungar wrote:We've decided to allow each race it's own nation! Now how about that? It's almost as if different people from different cultures have different values and goals
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 2:51 pm
The Gilded Star wrote:Vungar wrote:We've decided to allow each race it's own nation! Now how about that? It's almost as if different people from different cultures have different values and goals
People of the same race can have different cultures and values and goals as well, so racially segregating everyone is great for segregationists, but not so much for everyone else.
by Sodoran Alesia » Wed Apr 22, 2020 3:03 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Xoriet wrote:Yeah, that would be the Delegate of Farkasfalka who is a Holocaust denier.
Oh sure, some Farkasfalkans may have some unsavoury ideas, but here is where we live up to our libertarian tag; we don't have a thought police. Unlike other regions, who foster machine men with machine minds, we have no 1984-esque dystopian policies that control what you think, feel, and say.
Of course, subtract site rules.
But nevertheless, one of the slogans of our region is to fight both "degeneracy and tyranny for a better world", and we fully intend to live up to our promises. This is a great opportunity for the Government of Farkasfalka to really delve in deep with the issue of Free Speech and the priority role it has in our region; how we truly cherish the freedom of political liberty.
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 3:09 pm
Sodoran Alesia wrote:Ah yes because we all know there is only two extremes, thought police or freedom, nothing in between.
Sodoran Alesia wrote:Of cource, what can I expect from a fascist region trying to defend holocaust denial and anti-semitism?
by Zeritae » Wed Apr 22, 2020 3:15 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Agarntrop wrote:snip
One already exists: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=484632&start=25
And seeing we're over the page limit, I #ilock now. We can't let the umm, super virus get out now.
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 3:25 pm
Zeritae wrote:What is your opinion on those authoritarian regions that do require nations inside to be fascist/nazi, like United Fascist Workers Association?
by Zeritae » Wed Apr 22, 2020 4:05 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Zeritae wrote:What is your opinion on those authoritarian regions that do require nations inside to be fascist/nazi, like United Fascist Workers Association?
That's a good question to address, but I can only answer personally at the time. While I'm indifferent on ideological specifications (fascist/nazi/francoist, etc...), I'm firmly against imposed universal beliefs. It's unhealthy, and a region, let alone a nation or a civilisation cannot thrive, develop, challenge, and improve upon itself. Situations develop, difficulties a country may face are always different, and so it's drastically clear that there cannot be a 'one size fits all' ideology.
Considering this, I find authoritarian regions that formally enforce a strict ideology on it's populous troublesome, and dissatisfactory. I wouldn't be surprised if they struggle to cope with each new issue that arises for them. Though this is just my opinion.
Zurkerx wrote:Agarntrop wrote:snip
One already exists: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=484632&start=25
And seeing we're over the page limit, I #ilock now. We can't let the umm, super virus get out now.
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 4:11 pm
Zeritae wrote:Nouveau Quebecois wrote:That's a good question to address, but I can only answer personally at the time. While I'm indifferent on ideological specifications (fascist/nazi/francoist, etc...), I'm firmly against imposed universal beliefs. It's unhealthy, and a region, let alone a nation or a civilisation cannot thrive, develop, challenge, and improve upon itself. Situations develop, difficulties a country may face are always different, and so it's drastically clear that there cannot be a 'one size fits all' ideology.
Considering this, I find authoritarian regions that formally enforce a strict ideology on it's populous troublesome, and dissatisfactory. I wouldn't be surprised if they struggle to cope with each new issue that arises for them. Though this is just my opinion.
You have embassies with ic and ooc authoritarian regions, why not talk on them to get them to not require nations to adhere to one specific ideology?
by Vungar » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:12 pm
The Gilded Star wrote:Vungar wrote:We've decided to allow each race it's own nation! Now how about that? It's almost as if different people from different cultures have different values and goals
People of the same race can have different cultures and values and goals as well, so racially segregating everyone is great for segregationists, but not so much for everyone else.
Founder and Király Farkas of Farkasfalka and the Farkas Lovagok
_________ | _________ | _________ | _________ | _________
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:14 pm
Vungar wrote:The Gilded Star wrote:
People of the same race can have different cultures and values and goals as well, so racially segregating everyone is great for segregationists, but not so much for everyone else.
A multicultural nation is terrible for all cultures involved.
Why is it that such a large majority of the Pakistanis in Britain don't want to conform to their new land's culture? They live self-isolated and away from the British in their own communities, emerging from them often to spit on British culture and do other terrible things in high quantities. It's a fact that when groups of two or more different kinds of people with different values live next to each other, there is bound to be tension between them and worse, as we can see with the disproportionately high amounts of violence.
When I said race, by the way, I was referring to ethnic groups of people, rather than white, black, yellow, or avatar. I should have said ethnicities, my apologies.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:15 pm
Vungar wrote:Why is it that such a large majority of the Pakistanis in Britain don't want to conform to their new land's culture? They live self-isolated and away from the British in their own communities, emerging from them often to spit on British culture and do other terrible things in high quantities. It's a fact that when groups of two or more different kinds of people with different values live next to each other, there is bound to be tension between them and worse, as we can see with the disproportionately high amounts of violence.
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:17 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Vungar wrote:A multicultural nation is terrible for all cultures involved.
Why is it that such a large majority of the Pakistanis in Britain don't want to conform to their new land's culture? They live self-isolated and away from the British in their own communities, emerging from them often to spit on British culture and do other terrible things in high quantities. It's a fact that when groups of two or more different kinds of people with different values live next to each other, there is bound to be tension between them and worse, as we can see with the disproportionately high amounts of violence.
When I said race, by the way, I was referring to ethnic groups of people, rather than white, black, yellow, or avatar. I should have said ethnicities, my apologies.
Ah yes, this is all so much better.
...
...
/s, just in case.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:23 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:
Participation in our thread is non-compulsory. You are free to choose whether or not you would like to contribute to foster the ideological identity of our region. In the event you choose not to participate, however, I would recommend simply not posting.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Nouveau Quebecois » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:26 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:- to come quote and highlight that none other than the founder of your region is arguing boldfacedly for racial/ethnic segregation.
by The Notorious Mad Jack » Wed Apr 22, 2020 6:55 pm
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Vungar wrote:Why is it that such a large majority of the Pakistanis in Britain don't want to conform to their new land's culture? They live self-isolated and away from the British in their own communities, emerging from them often to spit on British culture and do other terrible things in high quantities. It's a fact that when groups of two or more different kinds of people with different values live next to each other, there is bound to be tension between them and worse, as we can see with the disproportionately high amounts of violence.
But then again, there are also examples of Pakistanis and Englishmen living together without elevated levels of violence. In fact, many homogenous societies seem to have violence rates dependant on preexisting factors other then ethnic diversity. What about religiously diverse nations?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement