by Levantx » Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:53 pm
by Lyrical International Brigade » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:03 pm
by Cuba-Venezuela » Wed Dec 11, 2019 7:05 pm
Lyrical International Brigade wrote:I simply cannot express how disappointed I am that the Font Convention is not a convention for discussing fonts.
Sans serif? More like sans soul!
(yeah I went there)
by Aynia Moreaux » Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:46 am
by Kaystein » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:38 am
by Cossack Peoples » Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:40 am
"You give a monkey a stick, inevitably he’ll beat another monkey to death with it."
— Sadavir Errinwright, Expanse S2E12
by Blood Wine » Fri Dec 13, 2019 3:30 am
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by Kaystein » Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:51 am
by Fransmany » Sat Dec 14, 2019 9:00 am
by Levantx » Tue Dec 17, 2019 4:23 pm
by Lenlyvit » Tue Dec 17, 2019 5:43 pm
by Aynia Moreaux » Wed Dec 18, 2019 4:58 am
is to agree among those major region NOT to recognize those smaller regions as "equals" or sovereign. So that it is less attractive to create meaningless UCR's unless you have a group/community support.
by Warzone Codger » Wed Dec 18, 2019 6:34 am
by Pangurstan » Thu Dec 19, 2019 11:12 pm
Warzone Codger wrote:Support. Time for the Oligarchs to band together and shake things up...
It's not that far fetched to be honest; many big regions already have size requirements before you can make embassies with them for them to acknowledge you. This mainly appears to be formalising it and banding it together at the multi regional level.
Rather than debating the merits of it, I want to know what it actually does.
by Warzone Codger » Fri Dec 20, 2019 12:15 pm
Pangurstan wrote:Warzone Codger wrote:Support. Time for the Oligarchs to band together and shake things up...
It's not that far fetched to be honest; many big regions already have size requirements before you can make embassies with them for them to acknowledge you. This mainly appears to be formalising it and banding it together at the multi regional level.
Rather than debating the merits of it, I want to know what it actually does.
It looks like it just defines regions with less than 35 WA members as non-sovereign.
by Levantx » Fri Dec 20, 2019 2:19 pm
by East Meranopirus » Sat Dec 21, 2019 3:49 am
Levantx wrote:I think the next big thing for Nationstates (or at least I hope) is interregional cooperation and linkages.
by Latrovia » Sat Dec 21, 2019 4:45 pm
East Meranopirus wrote:Levantx wrote:I think the next big thing for Nationstates (or at least I hope) is interregional cooperation and linkages.
I think you've been living under a rock named Thaecia since the beginning of your time in NS. I thought every knew that interregional cooperation has been a vital part of NS since its beginning.
by Fransmany » Sun Dec 22, 2019 11:46 pm
So the answer is not more small regions, but more big regions, and that is something we do not have here in NS. I am not saying that small regions serve no purpose. Because being part of a smaller regions is even more fun sometimes than a big region, locality, like minded people and sometimes more activity possibilities.
by Xoriet » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:46 am
Fransmany wrote:So the philosophy behind this convention is diet Francoism?So the answer is not more small regions, but more big regions, and that is something we do not have here in NS. I am not saying that small regions serve no purpose. Because being part of a smaller regions is even more fun sometimes than a big region, locality, like minded people and sometimes more activity possibilities.
by Lyrical International Brigade » Mon Dec 23, 2019 8:12 am
Xoriet wrote:...What you're looking at is a weird mindset where suddenly regions with no particular importance here think they have the right to call other regions unworthy of being called sovereign because they don't meet the qualifications of this certain group trying to elevate themselves above the others....
...I'm definitely against the idea of your group trying to climb up the social ladder by disregarding other regions that struggle to make it or are happy in a smaller state.
by Warzone Codger » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:02 pm
Xoriet wrote:
Not really anything like Francoism, unless you mean the elitist mindset behind it. Francoism had nothing to do with devaluing regions' rights to determining sovereignty. Later on it was used in ways that completely did undermine that exact thing, but that was not related to the original document at all.
What you're looking at is a weird mindset where suddenly regions with no particular importance here think they have the right to call other regions unworthy of being called sovereign because they don't meet the qualifications of this certain group trying to elevate themselves above the others.
This is a weird way to try to gain relevancy. If you want the support of the GCRs to declare that regions of a certain size should be ostracized from the community because they don't meet your qualifications, I doubt you'll be getting it from most of us. GCR mechanics are totally different to UCR mechanics. You can't compare us at all. If you're using the GCRs to determine the rights of smaller UCRs, you're making a big mistake.
I'm definitely against the idea of your group trying to climb up the social ladder by disregarding other regions that struggle to make it or are happy in a smaller state.
by Levantx » Wed Dec 25, 2019 7:16 pm
Xoriet wrote:snip
Warzone Codger wrote: snip
by Levantx » Thu Dec 26, 2019 2:46 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: PhDre
Advertisement