by Talatorrum » Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:49 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 05, 2019 12:55 pm
Talatorrum wrote:I am seriously baffled by the results of this issue that I have just answered recently. The story is that there was Something
About women dressing more promiscuous and then of course I picked the option where men had
more control over their women. But out of nowhere, income equality skyrocketed and it turns out that the option that I picked made my nation
into a socialist hellhole. Seriously how did my option decrease economic freedom?
by Talatorrum » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:02 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Talatorrum wrote:I am seriously baffled by the results of this issue that I have just answered recently. The story is that there was Something
About women dressing more promiscuous and then of course I picked the option where men had
more control over their women. But out of nowhere, income equality skyrocketed and it turns out that the option that I picked made my nation
into a socialist hellhole. Seriously how did my option decrease economic freedom?
Wrong. Your nation does not have the Socialism policy: https://www.nationstates.net/nation=tal ... l=policies
by Khoronzon » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:06 pm
The world is no longer as it once was, moulded beyond recognition by the hands of its coming masters. Humanity is faced with a simple choice: evolve, or die.
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:10 pm
Khoronzon wrote:Arguably "socialism" isn't the hellhole part, but opinions aside, your wealth gaps were enormous prior to this change, and still are. Income equality "skyrocketed" from 0.13 to 0.25.
there is a vast disparity between incomes, with the richest 10% of citizens earning 1,524,337 per year while the poor average 3,880, a ratio of 392 to 1.
by Marquisal » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:11 pm
_____ |= Feel free to talk to us! =| _____✠ This GLORIOUS nation is an extreme parody of my political views, but somehow not so much ✠† _DEUS VULT!_ † LINK TO THE SPECIAL NEWS BULLETIN: Remember to upvote, a happy FactBook is a happy Marquisal! And a happy Marquisal is good news for everyone!
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:11 pm
Talatorrum wrote:Yeah. But it is still way too stupid for me that such an option has these results.
by Evil Dictators Happyland » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:17 pm
by Talatorrum » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:20 pm
by Burqistan » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:20 pm
Tʜᴇ Gʀᴇᴀᴛ Pᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ's Bᴇʏʟᴇʀʙᴇʏʟɪᴋ ᴏꜰ Bᴜʀǫɪsᴛᴀɴ
A Turkic Central Asian despotism where men are men, women are men, hell, even the donkeys are men.
Comically oppressed and tragically poor... and armed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
aaaaaaa☪aaaaaaa
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:23 pm
by Talatorrum » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:29 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:31 pm
Khoronzon wrote:Income equality "skyrocketed" from 0.13 to 0.25.
by Saciu » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:36 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:42 pm
Saciu wrote:The New California Republic wrote:
I stand by what I said: the effects were negligible.
https://www.nationstates.net/nation=tal ... censusid=4 does show a more dramatic change, perhaps he's getting at that.
by Talatorrum » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:46 pm
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:21 pm
Talatorrum wrote:The logic behind this result shouldn't Even be tanken seriously since the issues's outcome literally says that fathers have the right to sell their daughter to whomever they choose.
by All Wild Things » Thu Dec 05, 2019 4:03 pm
Talatorrum wrote:The logic behind this result shouldn't Even be taken seriously since the issues's outcome literally says that fathers should have the right to sell their daughters to whomever they choose.
Seriously the autocorrection is so inefficient
by Saciu » Fri Dec 06, 2019 10:31 am
Talatorrum wrote:The logic behind this result shouldn't Even be taken seriously since the issues's outcome literally says that fathers should have the right to sell their daughters to whomever they choose.
Seriously the autocorrection is so inefficient
by Fauxia » Fri Dec 06, 2019 3:41 pm
by The Free Joy State » Fri Dec 06, 2019 10:19 pm
by Talatorrum » Sat Dec 07, 2019 12:44 pm
Saciu wrote:Talatorrum wrote:The logic behind this result shouldn't Even be taken seriously since the issues's outcome literally says that fathers should have the right to sell their daughters to whomever they choose.
Seriously the autocorrection is so inefficient
Perhaps poor fathers are selling their daughters to rich people.
by Saciu » Sun Dec 08, 2019 5:43 am
Talatorrum wrote:Fauxia wrote:You’re going to have to say which option you chose if you want help here.
I have posted the issue number in this thread. You can search the issue number on the NSindex
4 The nation allows marriage. “Since when have we let the women of this country determine its morality?” rages traditionalist @@RANDOMMALENAME@@, his wife and daughters standing behind him in fearful silence. “A woman’s nakedness is for her husband to behold, and for none other. All women should be forced to cover themselves head-to-toe while in public, and should not venture out of the home without permission. They should obey their husbands or male relatives in all things, including their clothing choices.” …fathers are free to sell their daughters to whomever they choose.
here
incase you can't figure it out yourself
Another thing that I find completely unbelievable is that almost everyone seems to insist that lowering womens worker rights
increases wealth equality. Do you believe that if it wasn't allowed for almost 50% of my nation's population to leave the house that my nation's income equality would rise or do you believe it would plummet? If theoretically 50% percent of my population didn't get any income (excluding slavery for a second) do you seriously believe that there would be more equality in this wonderful empire of mine.Saciu wrote:Perhaps poor fathers are selling their daughters to rich people.
I wouldn't find it plausible that a nobleman would want to buy a peasant's daughter for a significantly high prise.
by The Pope Is Catholic » Sun Dec 08, 2019 11:40 am
Talatorrum wrote:Another thing that I find completely unbelievable is that almost everyone seems to insist that lowering womens worker rights increases wealth equality. Do you believe that if it wasn't allowed for almost 50% of my nation's population to leave the house that my nation's income equality would rise or do you believe it would plummet? If theoretically 50% percent of my population didn't get any income (excluding slavery for a second) do you seriously believe that there would be more equality in this wonderful empire of mine.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement