Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 4:58 am
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
King HEM wrote:A lot of issues are getting conflated here, and I think it's worth focusing on the things that should get someone blacklisted from Nationstates: bigotry directed at other players and serious false OOC accusations.
People keep bringing up being a leaker and lumping that into that, but tbh I don't really care if someone is leaking? That's apart of the espionage in the game and should not be conflated with the other issues in my opinion.
Slitherin Snakes wrote:Koth then in the rudest, meanest way possible told me I was done from TBH.
[3:59 PM] Brisko: Your Fire Nation WFEs are unacceptable. I can't have someone who takes any opportunity to antagonize our members have any place in our organization. The Council has tried time and time again, given you more chances than anyone we've ever given anyone in the past, to have you grow up. But that's a process you'll have to do on your own from now on.
Best of luck to you in your raiding career, and to Fire Nation. Remember that The Black Hawks are not your enemy, and it would be unwise to try to make one of us.
Cormactopia Prime wrote:What you are though is a homophobe, a leaker, and an all around jerk. You've dragged an otherwise good player (Vult) down with you in your scheming and deception. You're as poisonous as Block. Get lost.
Nagatar Karumuttu Chettiar wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:What you are though is a homophobe, a leaker, and an all around jerk. You've dragged an otherwise good player (Vult) down with you in your scheming and deception. You're as poisonous as Block. Get lost.
Okay, pure curiosity here, but what is actually going on?
Nagatar Karumuttu Chettiar wrote:Lets just all be nice to each other. Is it really all that hard?
Cormactopia Prime wrote:In this case, he did it because of the OOC matters you've referenced, so it's part and parcel of the problematic OOC behavior. You can't really separate the two when his OOC behavior is what drove the leaking.
Cormactopia Prime wrote:I would imagine the reason leaking is being brought up more often is no one wants to get slapped with a Defamation warning from Moderation, even though anything they'd say wouldn't actually be defamatory because it would be 100% true, and could be backed up by hard evidence. That of course doesn't bother Moderation, they're fine with calling the truth lies and warning you for it if it will effectively silence discussions of bad OOC off-site behavior.
Blight-Bane wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:In this case, he did it because of the OOC matters you've referenced, so it's part and parcel of the problematic OOC behavior. You can't really separate the two when his OOC behavior is what drove the leaking.
I'm so tired of someone's off site behavior constantly being used as a weapon against them on site. Shit happens when humans interact online, not all of it good. You all talk a good game about ending toxicity in Gameplay, but are probably the main source of it.
Raionitu wrote:Blight-Bane wrote:I'm so tired of someone's off site behavior constantly being used as a weapon against them on site. Shit happens when humans interact online, not all of it good. You all talk a good game about ending toxicity in Gameplay, but are probably the main source of it.
This isn't 'using it as a weapon'. Go ahead and ask offsite where it can all be shared, look at the logs and everything else he did, and you will realize, this is nothing to do with using stuff as a weapon against them on site. This is keeping them out of the community both on and offsite because of very good reasons.
Raionitu wrote:Blight-Bane wrote:I'm so tired of someone's off site behavior constantly being used as a weapon against them on site. Shit happens when humans interact online, not all of it good. You all talk a good game about ending toxicity in Gameplay, but are probably the main source of it.
This isn't 'using it as a weapon'. Go ahead and ask offsite where it can all be shared, look at the logs and everything else he did, and you will realize, this is nothing to do with using stuff as a weapon against them on site. This is keeping them out of the community both on and offsite because of very good reasons.
Kurnugia wrote:Raionitu wrote:This isn't 'using it as a weapon'. Go ahead and ask offsite where it can all be shared, look at the logs and everything else he did, and you will realize, this is nothing to do with using stuff as a weapon against them on site. This is keeping them out of the community both on and offsite because of very good reasons.
I mean there are certainly it's reasons behind it. At the same time, this seems what NSGP only seems to do lately... Purely safeguarding the community and rarely playing the damn game.
Blight-Bane wrote:Raionitu wrote:This isn't 'using it as a weapon'. Go ahead and ask offsite where it can all be shared, look at the logs and everything else he did, and you will realize, this is nothing to do with using stuff as a weapon against them on site. This is keeping them out of the community both on and offsite because of very good reasons.
I honestly don't care what he did. I don't interact with him at all. Since when did you all become the protectors of the community? Thanks, but no thanks. I'll take my chances with Moderation.
Blight-Bane wrote:Raionitu wrote:This isn't 'using it as a weapon'. Go ahead and ask offsite where it can all be shared, look at the logs and everything else he did, and you will realize, this is nothing to do with using stuff as a weapon against them on site. This is keeping them out of the community both on and offsite because of very good reasons.
I honestly don't care what he did. I don't interact with him at all. Since when did you all become the protectors of the community? Thanks, but no thanks. I'll take my chances with Moderation.
Blight-Bane wrote:Raionitu wrote:This isn't 'using it as a weapon'. Go ahead and ask offsite where it can all be shared, look at the logs and everything else he did, and you will realize, this is nothing to do with using stuff as a weapon against them on site. This is keeping them out of the community both on and offsite because of very good reasons.
I honestly don't care what he did. I don't interact with him at all. Since when did you all become the protectors of the community? Thanks, but no thanks. I'll take my chances with Moderation.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Kurnugia wrote:I mean there are certainly it's reasons behind it. At the same time, this seems what NSGP only seems to do lately... Purely safeguarding the community and rarely playing the damn game.
Well, we do still raid, but that’s hard when update has been borked more often than not for a month now /shrug. Can’t speak for defenders tho.
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Moderation literally will not protect you, or anyone else, from bad behavior off-site. So that's not a solution, at all.
Cataluna wrote:With all due respect, stay in your lane, fenda. Enough with the moral pretenses. Banning Money created a safer space for vulnerable members of our community, and you wanting to go after Cormac for "omg so toxic" doesn't change that. I sincerely hope Money decides to infiltrate the North Pacific next, if you're really so skeptical about our reasons.
Edit: I've been told your attitude is unpleasant in TNP as well. Perhaps not the best example. My apologies to TNP, I never meant to imply that TNP supported this guy's opinions.
Blight-Bane wrote:I for real laughed at that. What makes you think I give a rat's ass about TNP? My original nation was founded there, so I just keep it there for the stats. The funny thing is, Money was an up and coming raider at one time. So he betrayed your trust? Boo hoo. It's not like any of you have ever done that. But, by all means, police people's thoughts and actions off site. I know it makes you feel like you're working for the greater good.
Blight-Bane wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:Moderation literally will not protect you, or anyone else, from bad behavior off-site. So that's not a solution, at all.
I'm not worried about that. I don't need protection. I can easily log off.Cataluna wrote:With all due respect, stay in your lane, fenda. Enough with the moral pretenses. Banning Money created a safer space for vulnerable members of our community, and you wanting to go after Cormac for "omg so toxic" doesn't change that. I sincerely hope Money decides to infiltrate the North Pacific next, if you're really so skeptical about our reasons.
Edit: I've been told your attitude is unpleasant in TNP as well. Perhaps not the best example. My apologies to TNP, I never meant to imply that TNP supported this guy's opinions.
I for real laughed at that. What makes you think I give a rat's ass about TNP? My original nation was founded there, so I just keep it there for the stats. The funny thing is, Money was an up and coming raider at one time. So he betrayed your trust? Boo hoo. It's not like any of you have ever done that. But, by all means, police people's thoughts and actions off site. I know it makes you feel like you're working for the greater good.
Cataluna wrote:I don’t give a shit about raids lol. I care that he was objectively nasty to Siniarus and Jay, not to mention his actions against Koth. Wanting to improve our community by banning certain people who really should not be here is none of your business.
Cataluna wrote:You’re not and will never be a part of it, so you can get the fuck out if you have a problem with it.
Blight-Bane wrote:Cataluna wrote:I don’t give a shit about raids lol. I care that he was objectively nasty to Siniarus and Jay, not to mention his actions against Koth. Wanting to improve our community by banning certain people who really should not be here is none of your business.
Seriously? You're defending this shit by saying he dissed my friends?
I'll live. Umm.. btw, this isn't off site so you can't tell me to fuck off and it will suddenly happen.