NationStates

Raionitu wrote:

Rebels and Saints wrote:
The process is no different. The cause and results set us apart.
In typical invader regimes, the goal is to invade regions and gain control. In the Council, the goal is to oust invaders, stabilize a region, and then leave, returning it to its inhabitants.

So first you wanted to remove tyrants, now you want to remove invaders? What if the founder is the tyrant, would you try to fight that if given the option? They are a native, they just run their region differently that you would like

We would only attempt to intervene if there was a significant wish for intervention by those in the region, as I have already said numerous times.

Rebels and Saints wrote:

Sapientia Et Bellum wrote:And if the people want to be invaders? Regions operate on a volunteer basis lol

Then we do not intervene. I know regions are run on a volunteer basis. I said that we will only intervene when there is significant wish for us to do so.

I mean, this feels like a non-issue then. There is nothing forcing players to stay in a region, if they don't like the government they'll leave. Unless you mean you will only really be liberating regions specifically taken by outside forces

Raionitu wrote:

Rebels and Saints wrote:
Then we do not intervene. I know regions are run on a volunteer basis. I said that we will only intervene when there is significant wish for us to do so.

I mean, this feels like a non-issue then. There is nothing forcing players to stay in a region, if they don't like the government they'll leave. Unless you mean you will only really be liberating regions specifically taken by outside forces

In most cases, yes.

Rebels and Saints wrote:

Raionitu wrote:I mean, this feels like a non-issue then. There is nothing forcing players to stay in a region, if they don't like the government they'll leave. Unless you mean you will only really be liberating regions specifically taken by outside forces

In most cases, yes.

Now I'm curious, what are examples of other cases?

Raionitu wrote:

Rebels and Saints wrote:
In most cases, yes.

Now I'm curious, what are examples of other cases?

I am not fully sure. If they pop up, they pop up, but for now, we are mostly dealing with invaded regions.

Rebels and Saints wrote:

Raionitu wrote:Now I'm curious, what are examples of other cases?

I am not fully sure. If they pop up, they pop up, but for now, we are mostly dealing with invaded regions.

Cool, thanks for the answer and the RO spot, I would recommend starting with dealing with your own region, as it has been invaded to the fullest extent I can mange with 18 minutes of infiltration effort after getting off work.

Y'all need to start checking before you RO people, I've pulled the white hawks card on way too many start up fendas for it to still get me RO spots

I did check. And I knew it was coming. I've had experience with the Black Hawks before, you son of a -----.

I don't think you understand how democracy, or regions, work.

Rebels and Saints wrote:I did check. And I knew it was coming. I've had experience with the Black Hawks before, you son of a -----.

How you spell it, or don't spell it, doesn't matter. Don't insult other users.

Cheers.

There has to be a method to discern normal regions from actual tyranny. Regions with under a hundred players that aren’t fascist or totalitarian should be completely safe. I understand that sometimes there are regions with value to users that get corrupted, but others are a different story.

Lmao

Aclion wrote:I don't think you understand how democracy, or regions, work.

I understand quite perfectly how regions and democracies work. If you have a specific issue, please elaborate.

Audioslavia wrote:

Rebels and Saints wrote:I did check. And I knew it was coming. I've had experience with the Black Hawks before, you son of a -----.

How you spell it, or don't spell it, doesn't matter. Don't insult other users.

Cheers.

Cheers.

The Galactic Liberal Democracy wrote:There has to be a method to discern normal regions from actual tyranny. Regions with under a hundred players that aren’t fascist or totalitarian should be completely safe. I understand that sometimes there are regions with value to users that get corrupted, but others are a different story.

I can't quite understand what you're asking, so if this does not answer your question, please inform me.

My discernment between normal regions and tyrannical regions is based on whether there is a significant amount of the populace that is unhappy with an unrepresentative government. These are the only regions we plan to take action against.

Additionally, regions that make a habit of invading and subduing other regions, against the will of the populace of said regions, will be targeted, though most of these regions are too large to do anything about until significant growth is experienced by the Council.

/Bump

not interested we are a autocracy

Bump.