Advertisement
by Scottiesland » Tue Jan 15, 2019 11:19 am
by Myrth » Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:27 pm
Wycliffe wrote:Myrth wrote:
Not sure how this is a new page in the struggle against us imperial tyrants considering we withdrew from the region. If we hadn't done so, you wouldn't have gotten anywhere. You might as well pile into some other inactive region we have nothing to do with and claim it's a mighty victory against us.
An avowed enemy of the New Pacific Order is returning to a region you forced him out of and claimed in your sphere of influence. Better still, you abandoned it to him without a fight. This is only good news.
by Armaros » Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:30 pm
Myrth wrote:Wycliffe wrote:An avowed enemy of the New Pacific Order is returning to a region you forced him out of and claimed in your sphere of influence. Better still, you abandoned it to him without a fight. This is only good news.
Surely it's a victory for the NPO in so far as, for the duration of our interest in the matter, a NPO-backing regime was in power? Pierconium made clear even before his return to the senate that it was folly for the Pacific to bother maintaining an active interest in a UCR when to do so is against Francoist principles, so it's hardly surprising that one of his first acts was to advise against continuing the matter. It merely created a cause celebre for those with an axe to grind with the Pacific, so it's a rather sorry affair that the best "victory" our opponents can celebrate is the rather un-triumphant return to power of a formerly exiled native. It's rather like defenders claiming a grand victory when a group of invaders get bored of holding a region and move on.
by Drop Your Pants » Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:37 pm
Armaros wrote:"Everyone who celebrates the return of a native we forced out for no good reason and nearly killed off his community is an APC propagandist and is just sorry!" -Myrth
by The Tri State Area and Maine » Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:41 pm
Myrth wrote:Wycliffe wrote:An avowed enemy of the New Pacific Order is returning to a region you forced him out of and claimed in your sphere of influence. Better still, you abandoned it to him without a fight. This is only good news.
Surely it's a victory for the NPO in so far as, for the duration of our interest in the matter, a NPO-backing regime was in power? Pierconium made clear even before his return to the senate that it was folly for the Pacific to bother maintaining an active interest in a UCR when to do so is against Francoist principles, so it's hardly surprising that one of his first acts was to advise against continuing the matter. It merely created a cause celebre for those with an axe to grind with the Pacific, so it's a rather sorry affair that the best "victory" our opponents can celebrate is the rather un-triumphant return to power of a formerly exiled native. It's rather like defenders claiming a grand victory when a group of invaders get bored of holding a region and move on.
by The Gilded Star » Tue Jan 15, 2019 1:54 pm
Myrth wrote:it's a rather sorry affair that the best "victory" our opponents can celebrate is the rather un-triumphant return to power of a formerly exiled native. It's rather like defenders claiming a grand victory when a group of invaders get bored of holding a region and move on.
by Cormactopia Prime » Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:01 pm
by Dragonisia » Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:31 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Drop Your Pants wrote:His community? Always thought communities were group things. Weird.
Oh come on. How much did you have to stretch that innocuous comment to make it say the dastardly thing you interpreted it as saying? It's "his" in the sense that he belongs to it, not that it belongs to him. It's like saying "so and so was a pillar of his community." You're grasping at straws.
by Pierconium » Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:45 pm
The Tri State Area and Maine wrote:Why was the NPO interested in St Abbaddon in the first place?
by Unibot III » Tue Jan 15, 2019 2:52 pm
The Tri State Area and Maine wrote:Myrth wrote:
Surely it's a victory for the NPO in so far as, for the duration of our interest in the matter, a NPO-backing regime was in power? Pierconium made clear even before his return to the senate that it was folly for the Pacific to bother maintaining an active interest in a UCR when to do so is against Francoist principles, so it's hardly surprising that one of his first acts was to advise against continuing the matter. It merely created a cause celebre for those with an axe to grind with the Pacific, so it's a rather sorry affair that the best "victory" our opponents can celebrate is the rather un-triumphant return to power of a formerly exiled native. It's rather like defenders claiming a grand victory when a group of invaders get bored of holding a region and move on.
Why was the NPO interested in St Abbaddon in the first place?
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Myrth » Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:01 pm
The Gilded Star wrote:Myrth wrote:it's a rather sorry affair that the best "victory" our opponents can celebrate is the rather un-triumphant return to power of a formerly exiled native. It's rather like defenders claiming a grand victory when a group of invaders get bored of holding a region and move on.
I mean, for the people that actually care about the well-being of the region in question, yeah, both scenarios you just listed are cause for celebration for those people. Why wouldn't it be?
As for it being untriumphant, well... there's a lot of people cheering on Topid and St. Abbaddon right now, and Kitsco even announced an upcoming party in celebration of Topid's coronation, so...
Just because the NPO are pinching their noses in disdain and trying to act condescending about the whole matter doesn't mean their opinion is reflective of the rest of the community. I'm sure you'll find sympathetic party-poopers wanting to ruin the fun of St. Abbaddon somewhere if you look around enough, but this isn't the right place to search for them.
Also, since when has Pierconium adhered to Francoist principles? Last I remember, he denied ever being a Francoist and even criticized its influence in the NPO.
by The Gilded Star » Tue Jan 15, 2019 3:36 pm
Myrth wrote:I'm not begrudging them their reason to celebrate, I'm saying trying to celebrate it as some sort of victory over the NPO is grasping at straws.
As for Pierconium's principles, I think it's fair to say Ivan can only be defined in terms of being Ivan.
by Pallaith » Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:38 am
by Niktobr » Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:20 am
by Tim-Opolis » Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:49 am
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
Advertisement
Advertisement