Well, I think that maybe it should have run with something at least stating it was in an opinion section, which I am hoping this was in. There aren't clear separations in the paper, so it could be easily confused as being the official opinion of the Lazarene Gazette and by extension Lazarus.Syberis wrote:United Massachusetts wrote:I made a mistake in that incident, and have apologised for it. I don't intend to re-open this can of worms, because I acknowledge I made a mistake, but I had not seen evidence at the time that CCD harboured fascists. I had solicited such evidence from people on multiple occasions and never quite got it -- an instance of bad research on my part, to say the least. This is no defence, I acknowledge, nor do I intend it as such. I just want to make sure that point is clarified.
You've apologized for it. Great. Absolutely fucking great. You still did it. You still actively worked with a group to attempt to coup TNP out of some misplaced sense of righteousness, and you're still gonna get blasted for it, especially when Lazarus somehow posts an interview with you that hypes you up without touching on what you got caught doing a month ago. Acknowledging you made a mistake doesn't somehow absolve you of criticism for it, and certainly doesn't absolve Lazarus of making the terrible decision to run this story to begin with.
I love Lazarus, and I think they're generally really good at navigating the political landscape, but running this story was one of the most boneheaded decisions I've seen from them in a good long while.
If this was in general commentary or an editorial, then the paper could come into a lot more severe criticism, as then it isn't just the opinion of a private citizen, but that of the paper. For instance, I gave an interview to the Gazette, though I consider it an opinion of a private citizen of Lazarus, and not as the view of the Vice-Delegate.
I don't run the Gazette any more, but I think it is a learning experience for the Gazette next issue to be more careful in what is published and where. If this was general commentary though, then it is a good idea to look around for the other side, if it might be controversial to publish a story - as then the other side has made their opinions known, so it doesn't come across as favoring either opinion or as a soapbox.