It’s free coal. Why spend money on infrastructure if Lazarus is giving us natural resources for free?
Advertisement
by Pierconium » Sun Jan 20, 2019 3:56 pm
by Lord Dominator » Sun Jan 20, 2019 4:13 pm
Pierconium wrote:Also, what’s Communist Americas?
by North Prarie » Sun Jan 20, 2019 4:15 pm
SBT BottomLine-President Valieant welcomes first child Pax, Social Democrats gain big wins in Parliament elections, Lions win NPBL, Cavaliers win Prarie Hockey Cup, NPFA announces slow move away from world affairs
by Pierconium » Sun Jan 20, 2019 4:52 pm
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:34 pm
Pierconium wrote:Also, I guess mentioning that the Milograd region was not allied to the NPO is pointless as well?
by New Rogernomics » Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:41 pm
It is labelled as an ally, not a protectorate, as you can read in the public topic: https://nslazarus.com/showthread.php?tid=562Pierconium wrote:Lord Dominator wrote:Region that you (NPO) all fash-bashed, and then left a WFE claiming it was done to crush userites. IE, something that I assume Perg was involved in putting up
Meh. Not sure why it is labelled a protectorate. We are out of that business anyway. Also, I guess mentioning that the Milograd region was not allied to the NPO is pointless as well?
It is reported as described in passed legislation. So accuracy is to be taken up with the writers of the legislation itself.
by Jar Wattinree » Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:15 pm
by New Rogernomics » Sun Jan 20, 2019 7:42 pm
It is how the legislation is written. I can't make something that you believe is the case happen in the legislation of someone else. It is not inaccurate to state what is, nor is it the job of the Gazette to get the opinion of a hostile region on every claim that the citizens of Lazarus might make. It isn't the job of the Gazette to spread NPO propaganda or the NPO perspective either...that's yours.Jar Wattinree wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:It is reported as described in passed legislation. So accuracy is to be taken up with the writers of the legislation itself.
You need editorial notes then to fix these inaccuracies. You can keep the original content as reported without sacrificing accuracy due to changing events.
by Pierconium » Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:38 am
New Rogernomics wrote:It is labelled as an ally, not a protectorate, as you can read in the public topic: https://nslazarus.com/showthread.php?tid=562Pierconium wrote:Meh. Not sure why it is labelled a protectorate. We are out of that business anyway. Also, I guess mentioning that the Milograd region was not allied to the NPO is pointless as well?
It could have been clearer, but the plural protectorates was intended to be applied to the first two, and an ally to the last region mentioned.
by The Notorious Mad Jack » Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:31 am
by Cormactopia Prime » Mon Jan 21, 2019 4:25 am
The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:Azhukali was never an ally, protectorate or had anything to do with the NPO. The unfortunate presence of former NPOers in the region made it a legitimate target, but as someone who was in the region and helped set it up, and is in the successor region Greater Azhukali as Tordeo, quite frankly the idea that I or The Grim Reaper would allow Azhukali to be used by gameplayers to subvert GCRs is laughable.
by Pierconium » Mon Jan 21, 2019 5:15 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:Azhukali was never an ally, protectorate or had anything to do with the NPO. The unfortunate presence of former NPOers in the region made it a legitimate target, but as someone who was in the region and helped set it up, and is in the successor region Greater Azhukali as Tordeo, quite frankly the idea that I or The Grim Reaper would allow Azhukali to be used by gameplayers to subvert GCRs is laughable.
Neither you nor The Grim Reaper were the Founder or Delegate of Azhukali. I don't think anyone thinks either of you would willingly let a region be used to subvert GCRs, but neither of you were in a position to do anything about it either. Azhukali was classified as a de facto ally of the NPO based on the longtime association of its Founder and Delegate with the NPO. Granted, the NPO has banned them, but they have banned them before only to let them return later, calling into question whether they -- and Feux especially -- are ever really at odds with the NPO, or if it's all just an act.
It's worth noting that this resolution was passed in part to allow participation in the prior APC operation against Azhukali, not initiate a new one.
In regard to the separate question of whether Communist Americas was a de facto NPO protectorate, an issue raised by Pierconium, if the region had an NPO WFE, an embassy with the Pacific, NPO Regional Officers, and was locked down by NPO forces, I think it's safe to say it was in fact under the protection of the NPO. The ties between Communist Americas and the NPO had not yet been erased at the time the resolution was passed by the Lazarene Assembly, something the NPO did only after Lord Dominator posted a Liberate Communist Americas proposal for review in the Security Council forum.
by New Rogernomics » Mon Jan 21, 2019 5:47 am
No it doesn't. The Assembly would have to vote to declare a region as an ally or defacto ally of The Pacific, till then it is just opinions of private citizens. Nor is it the role of the Lazarene government to decide what citizens want to vote for. Hypothetically, all the claims could be incorrect but the Assembly is well within it's powers to vote for it.Pierconium wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:Neither you nor The Grim Reaper were the Founder or Delegate of Azhukali. I don't think anyone thinks either of you would willingly let a region be used to subvert GCRs, but neither of you were in a position to do anything about it either. Azhukali was classified as a de facto ally of the NPO based on the longtime association of its Founder and Delegate with the NPO. Granted, the NPO has banned them, but they have banned them before only to let them return later, calling into question whether they -- and Feux especially -- are ever really at odds with the NPO, or if it's all just an act.
It's worth noting that this resolution was passed in part to allow participation in the prior APC operation against Azhukali, not initiate a new one.
In regard to the separate question of whether Communist Americas was a de facto NPO protectorate, an issue raised by Pierconium, if the region had an NPO WFE, an embassy with the Pacific, NPO Regional Officers, and was locked down by NPO forces, I think it's safe to say it was in fact under the protection of the NPO. The ties between Communist Americas and the NPO had not yet been erased at the time the resolution was passed by the Lazarene Assembly, something the NPO did only after Lord Dominator posted a Liberate Communist Americas proposal for review in the Security Council forum.
As an associated nation of my own was a prominent member of government in the North Pacific for a considerable length of time that makes TNP a de facto ally of the Pacific by your logic, correct? Any past association means current de facto diplomatic relations evidently.
by Pierconium » Mon Jan 21, 2019 6:00 am
New Rogernomics wrote:No it doesn't. The Assembly would have to vote to declare a region as an ally or defacto ally of The Pacific, till then it is just opinions of private citizens. Nor is it the role of the Lazarene government to decide what citizens want to vote for. Hypothetically, all the claims could be incorrect but the Assembly is well within it's powers to vote for it.Pierconium wrote:As an associated nation of my own was a prominent member of government in the North Pacific for a considerable length of time that makes TNP a de facto ally of the Pacific by your logic, correct? Any past association means current de facto diplomatic relations evidently.
by New Rogernomics » Mon Jan 21, 2019 6:39 am
I didn't say I was speaking for Cormac, though I heavily doubt that Cormac came to this position alone or without evidence. Lazarene law doesn't allow for military action to be directed without vote.Pierconium wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:No it doesn't. The Assembly would have to vote to declare a region as an ally or defacto ally of The Pacific, till then it is just opinions of private citizens. Nor is it the role of the Lazarene government to decide what citizens want to vote for. Hypothetically, all the claims could be incorrect but the Assembly is well within it's powers to vote for it.
I did not realise you spoke for Cormac. My apologies, I will direct my inquiries regarding his logic to you from now on.
For the record, I was not speaking of Lazarus as a whole's logic, as that would be...illogical. Cormac provided his own reasoning that since Milograd was historically associated with the NPO that he is therefore always associated with the NPO. I asked for clarification regarding other nations. I could have asked if he was still associated with the NPO as well since he was once a member... Either way, the position remains the same. Pointing to nations that have been removed from the NPO and stating 'facts' such as any region they are associated with in the future is therefore a de facto ally of the Pacific doesn't make a lot of sense.
But you are correct, the Lazarene Assembly is welcome to vote on whatever it wishes, valid or not.
by Arlo » Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:51 am
Jar Wattinree wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:It is reported as described in passed legislation. So accuracy is to be taken up with the writers of the legislation itself.
You need editorial notes then to fix these inaccuracies. You can keep the original content as reported without sacrificing accuracy due to changing events.
Pierconium wrote:It is also unfortunate that the Lazarene Assembly can’t be bothered to fact-check proposals that it votes on but that is just a personal opinion.
by Altmoras » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:10 am
It is also unfortunate that the Lazarene Assembly can’t be bothered to fact-check proposals that it votes on but that is just a personal opinion.
by Pierconium » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:15 am
Arlo wrote:Pierconium wrote:It is also unfortunate that the Lazarene Assembly can’t be bothered to fact-check proposals that it votes on but that is just a personal opinion.
It is also unfortunate that previous Emperors of the Pacific allowed certain callous member of the Senate to basically ruin the NPO's reputation forever but that is just a personal opinion.
by Pierconium » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:19 am
Altmoras wrote:It is also unfortunate that the Lazarene Assembly can’t be bothered to fact-check proposals that it votes on but that is just a personal opinion.
What's real unfortunate is that the NPO can't seem to go 5 minutes without a state sponsored or encouraged attack on Lazarene sovereignty. If you guys manage to keep your hands off of it all year that would make 2019 the first year since like 2012 or somewhere around there that the NPO hasn't either subverted or outright attacked Lazarus.
by Altmoras » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:27 am
Pierconium wrote:Altmoras wrote:
What's real unfortunate is that the NPO can't seem to go 5 minutes without a state sponsored or encouraged attack on Lazarene sovereignty. If you guys manage to keep your hands off of it all year that would make 2019 the first year since like 2012 or somewhere around there that the NPO hasn't either subverted or outright attacked Lazarus.
I believe Lazarus has declared war on the Pacific. While I will not dispute the past wrongs the NPO has instigated against Lazarus, they are not directly relevant to anything that might occur this year as a result of ongoing hostilities. That is not to state the NPO is seeking to attack Lazarus, but the idea of Lazarus somehow being ‘hands off’ in a period of open aggression just seems a bit odd.
by New Rogernomics » Tue Jan 22, 2019 9:22 am
The Lazarene government decided that the best way was to put the war to a conscience vote of the Assembly, rather than for the cabinet and Delegate to strongly advocate for one position or the other. That said, Lazarus has varying degrees of opinion on how to conduct the war against The New Pacific Order, with some wanting to just oppose them in general, and others wanting a hot war where we use all avenues against the New Pacific Order.Altmoras wrote:Pierconium wrote:I believe Lazarus has declared war on the Pacific. While I will not dispute the past wrongs the NPO has instigated against Lazarus, they are not directly relevant to anything that might occur this year as a result of ongoing hostilities. That is not to state the NPO is seeking to attack Lazarus, but the idea of Lazarus somehow being ‘hands off’ in a period of open aggression just seems a bit odd.
After being dicked around for that long can you blame them?
And I'm not suggesting you'd declare Lazarus be hands-off either, attacking Lazarus is one of the most well practiced operations in the NPO playbook, idk what you guys would do if you didn't attack Lazarus.
And now that I think of it, it was rather silly of Lazarus to declare war instead of just recognizing hostilities in the years long campaign the NPO has been conducting against Laz.
by Kingdom of Napels » Tue Jan 22, 2019 9:36 am
Pierconium wrote:Altmoras wrote:
What's real unfortunate is that the NPO can't seem to go 5 minutes without a state sponsored or encouraged attack on Lazarene sovereignty. If you guys manage to keep your hands off of it all year that would make 2019 the first year since like 2012 or somewhere around there that the NPO hasn't either subverted or outright attacked Lazarus.
I believe Lazarus has declared war on the Pacific. While I will not dispute the past wrongs the NPO has instigated against Lazarus, they are not directly relevant to anything that might occur this year as a result of ongoing hostilities. That is not to state the NPO is seeking to attack Lazarus, but the idea of Lazarus somehow being ‘hands off’ in a period of open aggression just seems a bit odd.
by Pierconium » Tue Jan 22, 2019 4:41 pm
Kingdom of Napels wrote:Pierconium wrote:I believe Lazarus has declared war on the Pacific. While I will not dispute the past wrongs the NPO has instigated against Lazarus, they are not directly relevant to anything that might occur this year as a result of ongoing hostilities. That is not to state the NPO is seeking to attack Lazarus, but the idea of Lazarus somehow being ‘hands off’ in a period of open aggression just seems a bit odd.
Lazarus declared war on the NPO after the NPO had been waging war on us silently for years. And let's not pretend you're not seeking to attack Lazarus: you have done so for years in times of peace, so why would now be any different?
by The Gilded Star » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:46 pm
by Pierconium » Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:21 am
The Gilded Star wrote:I'm pretty sure he meant you as in the collective plural of the New Pacific Order, rather than you individually.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Xebloso
Advertisement