The Gameplay Awards 2017: Congrats! See you next year!

[Escade]

Then, while Glen and I have differing views on this - its become horribly passe and utterly lame to the level that GP fixates on him. Find a new target to regularly try to crucify or like get over yourself.

This is stupid nonsense, Escade. Don't scorn the fire for burning Glen when he regularly and willingly throws himself into it.

I'm not sure who or what the fire represents but several GPers on that side have said platitudes that explain their own behavior as "Don't take it personally."


So I think, don't take it personally.

[RiderSyl]

don't take it personally.

Don't worry, I'm not. Thanks for your concern.

I'm not sure who or what the fire represents

Lemme just be straight then. Glen puts himself in positions where he receives backlash. He's almost never a victim of circumstance. He draws attention to himself. So if you have a problem with the level that people pay attention to him, you should take it up with him. Telling all of GP to "like get over yourselves!" is... nonsense.

And since your 'Leave Glen alone' stuff and my responses have nothing to do with the Awards, I'mma stop responding.

[Escade]

It isn't leave Glenn alone, its control your vitriol so that its at a humane level instead of straight up ******** level. It only makes the whole group of people who can't stop fixating on him look like like they have a serious problem.

Don't agree with someone? That's fine and you can state that.

Don't agree with someone and lose ur nuts over it? Well it's still your loss.

[Reventus Koth]

It isn't leave Glenn alone, its control your vitriol so that its at a humane level instead of straight up ******** level. It only makes the whole group of people who can't stop fixating on him look like like they have a serious problem.

Don't agree with someone? That's fine and you can state that.

Don't agree with someone and lose ur nuts over it? Well it's still your loss.

As it turns out, Escade, one can argue with someone on a forum without "[having] a serious problem" or [losing] ur nuts over it". I don't know why you're acting as GR's attack dog here, I'm sure he didn't ask for your help.

The person you're replying to at no point did anything more than point out the flaws in GR's positions and argue against them. Like, get over yourself.

[Escade]

It isn't leave Glenn alone, its control your vitriol so that its at a humane level instead of straight up ******** level. It only makes the whole group of people who can't stop fixating on him look like like they have a serious problem.

Don't agree with someone? That's fine and you can state that.

Don't agree with someone and lose ur nuts over it? Well it's still your loss.

As it turns out, Escade, one can argue with someone on a forum without "[having] a serious problem" or [losing] ur nuts over it". I don't know why you're acting as GR's attack dog here, I'm sure he didn't ask for your help.

The person you're replying to at no point did anything more than point out the flaws in GR's positions and argue against them. Like, get over yourself.

The rhetoric was extreme and having seen the pile-ons before ridiculous as well.

And for an attack dog yourself, part of a bigger pile on then I can ever maintain, you've come out to defend your friend.

Although with you hypocrisy abounds as usual.

[Tim-Opolis]

I've got a great idea. Let's ignore Glen whenever he posts here because it's just bumping a thread we could have on Page 2 right now and completely forgotten about.

Instead it's at the top of GP right now, where it has no place being. Go bump some other threads, y'all.

[The Gameplay Awards 2017]

I agree.. Please quarrel elsewhere, like in the Neutral Ground thread.

Less than three days of voting left!

[Tim-Opolis]

I agree.. Please quarrel elsewhere, like in the Neutral Ground thread.

Sorry pal, but it'd be off topic to criticize your joke of an awards anywhere but your thread

[The Gameplay Awards 2017]

We've received a little less than half of the number of votes collected two years ago. The deadline is being extended an extra three days from now so more of you can drop your vote!

[Tim-Opolis]

We've received a little less than half of the number of votes collected two years ago. The deadline is being extended an extra three days from now so more of you can drop your vote!

Could it be because of your sketchyness and refusal to listen to community concerns? No surely not.

#boycott

[RiderSyl]

We've received a little less than half of the number of votes collected two years ago. The deadline is being extended an extra three days from now so more of you can drop your vote!

Since the flurry of comments before you moved forward didn't get the message across to you to change how you operate these awards, hopefully the lack of participation this year has gotten the message across instead.

[Indo-Malaysia]

We've received a little less than half of the number of votes collected two years ago. The deadline is being extended an extra three days from now so more of you can drop your vote!

Just end it.

Nobody is voting.

[Glen-Rhodes]

Voting Ticket

What is your intent by adding "in protest"?

My intent is that describing any form of raiding in the positive terms of “best” is oxymoronic, and thus I only vote so in protest of the rules requiring a complete ballot.

[Bedetopia]

What is your intent by adding "in protest"?

My intent is that describing any form of raiding in the positive terms of “best” is oxymoronic, and thus I only vote so in protest of the rules requiring a complete ballot.

If you don't agree with the rules, why feed votes to this sham?

Play of the Game 2017 does not force you to complete every category.

[Ever-Wandering Souls]

What is your intent by adding "in protest"?

My intent is that describing any form of raiding in the positive terms of “best” is oxymoronic, and thus I only vote so in protest of the rules requiring a complete ballot.

Funny, part of my set of complaints was that forcing everyone to vote in everything even if they don’t care about/have sufficient knowledge about that item, is silly and skews the results unnecessarily.

[Glen-Rhodes]

My intent is that describing any form of raiding in the positive terms of “best” is oxymoronic, and thus I only vote so in protest of the rules requiring a complete ballot.

If you don't agree with the rules, why feed votes to this sham?

Play of the Game 2017 does not force you to complete every category.

Because these are silly contests nobody should take that seriously, and that includes the way they're run and who runs them ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Vote or don't. Nobody gets anything material from any of these awards

If LWU or whoever were to flood Play of the Game, it would make that contest no more of a sham than when they did it to these awards last year

[The Stalker]

If LWU or whoever were to flood Play of the Game, it would make that contest no more of a sham than when they did it to these awards last year

Except we'd know who the host was, and it be public so we could all see it, way more accountability than an unknown person with unknown votes.

In the words of Hunter S Thompson, Anything worth doing, is worth doing right.

[The Gameplay Awards 2017]

Voting has closed. Please await the results as they are tallied.

[Trumpsupporter]

Looking forward to the results

[Vulturret]

Hope the results will be reflective of the actual views of the gameplay community.

[Tim-Opolis]

Bet you our mysterious OP doesn't catch all the fake votes.

[Vulturret]

Bet you our mysterious OP doesn't catch all the fake votes.

POTG was just better.

[States of Glory]

Voting has closed. Please await the results as they are tallied.

It shouldn't take that long to tally two votes, surely?

[Trumpsupporter]

Voting has closed. Please await the results as they are tallied.

It shouldn't take that long to tally two votes, surely?

Maybe he's procrastinating

[Vulturret]

It shouldn't take that long to tally two votes, surely?

Maybe he's procrastinating

So he can 'extend' the vote, and make more puppets...