Escade wrote:Yeah that's what I'm saying is that you've created a myth that has no basis in reality or actions whatsoever. Like seriously? This seems like a ploy to drum up artificial activity or like artificial something. If people are bored, there's better things to do. Like there's this new thing - social events - where you actually like try to build some camaraderie in your community and stuff.
First of all, this isn't Facebook; it's a political simulation game.
Secondly, I'm tired of this pretense that defenders just want to be social, have fun, and don't want to be engaged in all the politics when it is your side smearing other regions and their leadership, your side that is the only one proven to be involved in voter importation in Lazarus, your side that dragged all of this onto the Gameplay forum in the first place, and your side that first started using the tactics you now decry in Lazarus.
What it means when defenders say people are taking the game too seriously and we should all just have fun and be social is that we should not resist their politicking with politics of our own, and should instead just hand over our regions to them and go have a festival or something. It's a misdirection tactic designed to distract us from the reality that it's defenders who are engaging in so-called "toxic politics," political smear campaigns, and the subversion of various Feeders and Sinkers in pursuit of their ideological agenda. It's okay for them, but the rest of us should be ashamed.
Escade wrote:Also are you speaking on behalf of Balder, Osiris, and the West Pacific? Is this some sort of triumvirate now? Tell me more....
Well, let's see, I'm a citizen of Osiris with no governmental role, a mere resident of the West Pacific, and I've been declared persona non grata by Balder. Do you think I'm speaking for any of them? Me neither. I don't need to speak for them to speak about them, and about the coordinated propaganda campaign defenders have undertaken against them over the course of several years. This is, again, just a distraction tactic to evade my points.
Ikania wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:You say that like I regard it as a universal moral principle. I don't care if Funkadelia is doing it right now (which is not to say that he is), I only care that when defenders do it after they've taken power in Lazarus,
So we've established that you don't give a damn about Lazarus, its community, or its sovereignty, and you welcome foreign subversion when it harms defender natives.
We have? Because I'm pretty sure I'm already on the record, numerous times, arguing that all of this is better for Lazarus. That it is also better for every single non-defender region in gameplay doesn't negate the benefits for Lazarus itself or indicate that I don't care about Lazarus. I don't care about defenders being purged from Lazarus, which is not the same thing as not caring about Lazarus. Funkadelia will bring much-needed stability to Lazarus, which will allow for real growth and more sustained activity further down the road. That is better for Lazarus.
Ikania wrote:It will mean a Lazarus that is more hostile to the interests of non-defender regions and more friendly with our enemies. That is all any non-defender region, or any person from such a region, should care about. We do not need Lazarus to be the Sinker version of the South Pacific; having just one version of the South Pacific is already one too many.
I'm not aware of any rhetoric currently being put forth by our government suggesting we seek the establishment of a defender region, or advocate anything that will be hostile to simple non-defender interests. Or is independence from raider supremacist control counting as a defender plot these days?
Your "resistance" is filled to the brim with defenders affiliated with the Grey Wardens and the South Pacific, who have been hostile to non-defender regions for a very long time. You don't have to say that you're going to be hostile to non-defender regions or closely aligned with our enemies, because it's just obvious. And of course you aren't saying it, because in order to win this and take power in Lazarus you will need support from at least some non-defender regions, which is why your messaging is about "blah blah democracy, blah blah rights" when in reality this is only about defenderism, and defenders didn't care about democracy or rights when they were stomped by the People's Republic of Lazarus. Fortunately, it seems most non-defender regions see through your thinly veiled bullshit, which is why you have no non-defender support. Even The North Pacific remains on the sidelines.
Roavin wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:Do you honestly expect me to believe they aren't going to conduct show trials for non-defenders, presided over by judges who will be selected by the "resistance"? Give me a break. There's no way they're just going to let Funkadelia, Evil Wolf, Lamb, and the non-defenders they've been accusing of being "imported voters" without any evidence remain in Lazarus. They're going to conduct laughably biased "trials" and purge them.
So you didn't answer my request (which was to demonstrate any intent), and instead posted your prediction. That's not answering my question.
Ikania has already said that Funkadelia, Evil Wolf, and Lamb will be tried, and wouldn't rule out trials for others. If you're expecting harder evidence than that, I'll tell you what: I'll post some when you post any hard evidence at all of voter importation perpetrated by Funkadelia.
Roavin wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:Why would I care? Why should anyone besides defenders? It isn't in our interests to support the defender "resistance," and we won't be rewarded for it if the "resistance" becomes a government. They will just double down on hostility toward non-defender Feeders and Sinkers and even closer alignment with our enemies, such as the Grey Wardens and the South Pacific. You're basically telling us to support the "resistance" so our enemies can have control of another Sinker, because morals or something. Is that actually what passes for a compelling argument in 2017 NationStates?
When you're fighting a cold war, you don't cede territory to your enemies because it's the "right thing to do" according to your enemies.
You continuously assert that this is about defenders. Can you demonstrate that the resistance, which includes independents, raiders, and people that just plain don't give a damn about alignment, is a defender resistance? Once again, I am asking for anything even remotely tangible, and not your supposition or prediction.
There is one raider in the "resistance." One. The rest are defenders or so-called "independents" (most of whom eschew that label, but it's amusing to see you of all people using it when it's convenient) who are sympathetic to the defender cause, many of whom are affiliated with defender regions like the South Pacific. The leadership of the "resistance," Aumelodia, is defender. The apparent de facto spokesperson for the "resistance," Ikania, is defender. There is not a single non-defender region supporting the "resistance," unless you count USSD, which I don't because the "resistance" declined their support and because I would rather just not count USSD in anything, to be honest.
I also find it laughable that you're demanding hard evidence from me that this is a defender "resistance" when your side has accused the government of Lazarus under Funkadelia of being a raider puppet state. You say your side has independents and "people that just plain don't give a damn about alignment," but the Lazarene government has such people and you have dismissed them as imported voters who are voting according to raider interests to help Funkadelia implement a raider agenda in Lazarus. Don't demand hard evidence when you refuse to base your own arguments and propaganda on hard evidence -- there is much more evidence for foul play on your side than on the government's.
I'm not saying it's unacceptable for Feeders or Sinkers to decide to be defender. All I'm saying is they shouldn't expect support from non-defenders.