North Prarie wrote:The NAtion OF Froggy wrote:
Yes, thats called the risks of treaty signing. You dont get to make demands if the treaty is broken. Its perfectly logical. You have to weigh risk vs reward. Im unsure how you think tsp gets to tell a region who to or not to ban. Because they were taken advantage of.. If wars the consequence ok. But the npo or any region has any obligation to listen anymore.
So you're saying that being taken advantage of by an ally is a consequence of signing a treaty? What kind of logic is that?
Reality. Is the npo going to ban perg no. They have no reason too. They don't have to because everyone says to they dont answer to you the only thing the enemies of the npo can do is hope changes comes or try and cut down Ale's 175k plis influence and coup.
The npo has a greay in-house propaganda machine most npoers dont go to gp. They dont care about what other regions want they are happy there.. Everyone can hate the npo but the npo wont and will not care. I mean, whos to say in six Weeks ale and perg wont be back in power and gp on to the new shiny drama... Thats what gp does. Its got such a short attention span the npo regime knows and has weathered the same thing 5 years ago when I started in the npo. Thats what they do. They are under no obligation to listen to anyone since everyone pulled what little leverage there was now they will just prepare for a seige and see who blinks first. Its rational and reasonable.
So the you broke the treaty and now you owe us something is not going to work in any place since theyve been there done that...