Embassy of the South Pacific

[Roavin]

"I know associates, I have the best associates. Binders full of associates."

I wanted to laugh with you but then I remembered that he did get elected president even after saying such words

Edit: spelling

Well, binders-full-of-women guy (Mitt Romney) didn't at least. (and now I stop before this veers too far into NSG territory )

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

I wanted to laugh with you but then I remembered that he did get elected president even after saying such words

Edit: spelling

Well, binders-full-of-women guy (Mitt Romney) didn't at least. (and now I stop before this veers too far into NSG territory )

Join us in painful political discussion.... *trys to drag you into NSG*

[Amerion]

Well, binders-full-of-women guy (Mitt Romney) didn't at least. (and now I stop before this veers too far into NSG territory )

Join us in painful political discussion.... *trys to drag you into NSG*

Never! *Runs away before I get dragged into that soul-destroying void of despair*

[Ever-Wandering Souls]

Join us in painful political discussion.... *trys to drag you into NSG*

Never! *Runs away before I get dragged into that soul-destroying void of despair*

Think you took a wrong turn somewhere, becuase you're already in the "soul-destroying void" corner of Ns

[McChimp]

Omai, a challenge!

The Coalition of the South Pacific has stood since June 2003, the longest extant democracy in the game and to this day a beacon of pluralistic democracy. It's been through coup attempts, game glitches, forum crashes, voter importation, subversion, and the whole nine yards; still, it stands. But you're going to bring it to its knees?

glhf

Twice the pride, double the fall.

[Federation of the Resentine Kingdom]

Omai, a challenge!

The Coalition of the South Pacific has stood since June 2003, the longest extant democracy in the game and to this day a beacon of pluralistic democracy. It's been through coup attempts, game glitches, forum crashes, voter importation, subversion, and the whole nine yards; still, it stands. But you're going to bring it to its knees?

glhf

Twice the pride, double the fall.

Isn't it still a bit early to be making references that far into the prequels? We're still on episode I, as far as I'm concerned.

[Lands of Anarchy]

Omai, a challenge!

The Coalition of the South Pacific has stood since June 2003, the longest extant democracy in the game and to this day a beacon of pluralistic democracy. It's been through coup attempts, game glitches, forum crashes, voter importation, subversion, and the whole nine yards; still, it stands. But you're going to bring it to its knees?

glhf

Twice the pride, double the fall.

It's treason, then.

Just fyi, I will not be contesting any treason charges, and I look forward to wearing my persona non grata designation as a badge of honor.

Just in case anyone was doubting the veracity of my claim that I already have associates in TSP.

What you said makes no sense. You not contesting the charge does not prove you already have associates in TSP.

If he didn't have associates, and he is trying to take over TSP, why would he not contest the charges, unless you think he is bluffing about all of this?

[Digory Kirke]

Twice the pride, double the fall.

Isn't it still a bit early to be making references that far into the prequels? We're still on episode I, as far as I'm concerned.

It's over, Cormac. He has the high ground.

[McChimp]

Isn't it still a bit early to be making references that far into the prequels? We're still on episode I, as far as I'm concerned.

Ye gods, whatta meesa sayin'?

[Ikania]

Isn't it still a bit early to be making references that far into the prequels? We're still on episode I, as far as I'm concerned.

It's over, Cormac. He has the high ground.

YOU UNDERESTIMATE MY POWER

[Amerion]

Isn't it still a bit early to be making references that far into the prequels? We're still on episode I, as far as I'm concerned.

It's over, Cormac. He has the high ground.

By that logic, GR will grow to be an old man, only to be slaughtered by Cyborg Cormac.

[Federation of the Resentine Kingdom]

If he didn't have associates, and he is trying to take over TSP, why would he not contest the charges, unless you think he is bluffing about all of this?

It's the only logical conclusion. I mean, he hasn't presented any actual evidence of there being any associates, only implied and implied and implied. Implications mean nothing without evidence as backup, of which he has presented none.

[Cormactopia Prime]

If he didn't have associates, and he is trying to take over TSP, why would he not contest the charges, unless you think he is bluffing about all of this?

It's the only logical conclusion. I mean, he hasn't presented any actual evidence of there being any associates, only implied and implied and implied. Implications mean nothing without evidence as backup, of which he has presented none.

You're right. Perhaps I should instead have mentioned the "border control" legislation that is currently visible only to legislators.

Now run along and find your mole(s), if you can.

[Farengeto]

It's the only logical conclusion. I mean, he hasn't presented any actual evidence of there being any associates, only implied and implied and implied. Implications mean nothing without evidence as backup, of which he has presented none.

You're right. Perhaps I should instead have mentioned the "border control" legislation that is currently visible only to legislators.

Now run along and find your mole(s), if you can.

You mean the one that recent passed voting (in a public forum) and was discussed in the same public channel as your treason charges were at around the same time? Really Cormac, you can do better than that.

[Federation of the Resentine Kingdom]

It's the only logical conclusion. I mean, he hasn't presented any actual evidence of there being any associates, only implied and implied and implied. Implications mean nothing without evidence as backup, of which he has presented none.

You're right. Perhaps I should instead have mentioned the "border control" legislation that is currently visible only to legislators.

Now run along and find your mole(s), if you can.

It's almost like we've discussed it in... *shocking* Public Chats and other public threads that even visitors can read??? How dastardly!

Seriously, you've proved nothing.

[Cormactopia Prime]

You're right. Perhaps I should instead have mentioned the "border control" legislation that is currently visible only to legislators.

Now run along and find your mole(s), if you can.

You mean the one that recent passed voting (in a public forum) and was discussed in the same public channel as your treason charges were at around the same time? Really Cormac, you can do better than that.

The voting forum isn't public. The legislation may have been publicly discussed today, but that isn't how I heard about it days ago.

In any event, I'm not going to give you anymore information to sniff out my associates in TSP. I'm sure you do believe I have associates, and you're trying to bait me into giving you enough information that you can narrow it down. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter to me whether you believe I have associates in TSP or not -- you will know I have them when I'm firmly in control of TSP and the Coalition is a heap of ashes in the dustbin of history.

[Solorni]

^_^ Escade can defend her own decisions, even if y'all consistently underestimate her

I just ask Unibot for everything that goes on in TSP. Don't even have to talk to Roavin or Escade.

[Federation of the Resentine Kingdom]

You mean the one that recent passed voting (in a public forum) and was discussed in the same public channel as your treason charges were at around the same time? Really Cormac, you can do better than that.

The voting forum isn't public. The legislation may have been publicly discussed today, but that isn't how I heard about it days ago.

In any event, I'm not going to give you anymore information to sniff out my associates in TSP. I'm sure you do believe I have associates, and you're trying to bait me into giving you enough information that you can narrow it down. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter to me whether you believe I have associates in TSP or not -- you will know I have them when I'm firmly in control of TSP and the Coalition is a heap of ashes in the dustbin of history.

It wasn't discussed today. Last time it was mentioned was a week ago. On a publicly available thread, last discussed on 8-25...... A week, or, in your case... days ago.
If you have actual agents, and you were just finding out about the Border Control act days ago, you clearly need better agents. You aren't proving to be particularly impressive or as terrifying as you are making yourself sound, though I find your confidence quite thrilling. And clearly it does matter to you enough that you'd try and goad us into believing you.

[Catalyse]

It's over, Cormac. He has the high ground.

By that logic, GR will grow to be an old man, only to be slaughtered by Cyborg Cormac.

Summing up this whole conversation with another Star Wars reference.

[Glen-Rhodes]

This is all just hilarious. Oooooo you have somebody telling you what bills are being voted on! Precursor to the downfall of the Coalition, no doubt!! Meanwhile, on the off chance you do have "agents" in TSP, what exactly is the plan? Presenting a bill to dissolve the government? There's nothing they could do without immediately outing themselves

[Cormactopia Prime]

The voting forum isn't public. The legislation may have been publicly discussed today, but that isn't how I heard about it days ago.

In any event, I'm not going to give you anymore information to sniff out my associates in TSP. I'm sure you do believe I have associates, and you're trying to bait me into giving you enough information that you can narrow it down. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter to me whether you believe I have associates in TSP or not -- you will know I have them when I'm firmly in control of TSP and the Coalition is a heap of ashes in the dustbin of history.

It wasn't discussed today. Last time it was mentioned was a week ago. On a publicly available thread, last discussed on 8-25...... A week, or, in your case... days ago.

It would have to have been discussed today for it to have been discussed around the same time as my treason charges, which is what Farengeto said. Perhaps you should get your stories straight. And no, it wasn't "discussed" in a publicly available thread on August 25, it was mentioned in passing.

If you have actual agents, and you were just finding out about the Border Control act days ago, you clearly need better agents. You aren't proving to be particularly impressive or as terrifying as you are making yourself sound, though I find your confidence quite thrilling. And clearly it does matter to you enough that you'd try and goad us into believing you.

They aren't "agents." They're associates. I don't ever have people who work for me, I always have people who work with me, and I'm happy to accept their help as often as they are able and willing to give it. If some information is outdated, so be it. The important thing is that I have associates in TSP, you don't know who they are, I will continue to build my number of associates, and eventually together we will take down the Coalition. You can believe this or not; I really couldn't care less. You'll believe it when we take down the Coalition.

I don't care if you find me impressive, let alone terrifying (which would be silly in a browser game, in any case). I only care if I'm effective in the end, at which point there will be no denying it. I think you're mistaking my amusement for caring what you think. The likelihood that you will target people you wrongly suspect of being my associates, marginalize or purge them, have a smaller and less active community as a result, and turn those folks permanently against the Coalition -- while still missing my actual associate(s), whom you will not suspect because you have no reason to -- all of that amuses me. And I'm certain it will happen as soon as Glen & Co. ramp up the fearmongering. So please don't mistake my casual game of cat and mouse to mean that I care what you think. I'm just chuckling and sitting back, waiting for you to do a large part of my work for me.

I actually even quite enjoy the mockery, because it will just make my eventual victory and all of you having to eat these words that much sweeter.

[Farengeto]

It wasn't discussed today. Last time it was mentioned was a week ago. On a publicly available thread, last discussed on 8-25...... A week, or, in your case... days ago.

It would have to have been discussed today for it to have been discussed around the same time as my treason charges, which is what Farengeto said. Perhaps you should get your stories straight. And no, it wasn't "discussed" in a publicly available thread on August 25, it was mentioned in passing.

Oh I blame poor search queries. I (incorrectly) referenced it as the BCO, including that it involved the BC (Border Control) RO power. Knowing I used the wrong acronym I doubt you even know its proper name. Searching for border control would have not shown it.

[Glen-Rhodes]

It's already gone from a war to a "cat and mouse" game lol

[Digory Kirke]

It's already gone from a war to a "cat and mouse" game lol

War is a cat and mouse game.

[Ryccia]

I only have this to say...

Bring it. We have stood time and time again from the worst of adversity. TSP will never fall to you and your interests.

The Coalition. Was. Is. Will be. Forever