NationStates

Nepleslia wrote:

Lord Dominator wrote:I'm not in LWU, nor do I accept believing in myself as a way to achieve mechanically impossible ends.

Japanese anime would like to have a word with you.

(emphasis mine)

That's wonderful for them

Why don't raiders just form their own Libcord? They could call it Raidercord or something.

Comfed wrote:Why don't raiders just form their own Libcord? They could call it Raidercord or something.

Lack of a need for omnipresent coordination

Lord Dominator wrote:

Tim-Opolis wrote:Maybe LWU should just try harder

I wasn't aware that trying harder was a solution to physical impossibly

Gameplay rhetoric has entirely swapped around, huh? i can't tell if this is an inside joke, or just a cosmic one.

RiderSyl wrote:

Lord Dominator wrote:
I wasn't aware that trying harder was a solution to physical impossibly

Gameplay rhetoric has entirely swapped around, huh?

It tends to do that

Tim-Opolis wrote:

Lord Dominator wrote:I'm sure LWU is capable of growing to a size to match a Feeder, TRR, and at least other UCRs of decent size, yes

Maybe LWU should just try harder

I remember the Black Riders making similar statements while they trouncing you guys on a nightly basis.

Wayneactia wrote:I remember the Black Riders making similar statements while they trouncing you guys on a nightly basis.

Now why did you have to bring up the cheating side of raiders, it was so nice before you did that.

Drop Your Pants wrote:

Wayneactia wrote:I remember the Black Riders making similar statements while they trouncing you guys on a nightly basis.

Now why did you have to bring up the cheating side of raiders, it was so nice before you did that.

Indeed

Drop Your Pants wrote:

Wayneactia wrote:I remember the Black Riders making similar statements while they trouncing you guys on a nightly basis.

Now why did you have to bring up the cheating side of raiders, it was so nice before you did that.

I guess I could have substituted the Hawks in instead. The statement still holds true.

Wayneactia wrote:

Drop Your Pants wrote:Now why did you have to bring up the cheating side of raiders, it was so nice before you did that.

I guess I could have substituted the Hawks in instead. The statement still holds true.

Shouldn’t you be busy in the SC knowing absolutely nothing about me but still making declarative statements?

I particularly liked the part where you ran away from the thread and have subsequently ignored it after I called your lies out.

Wayneactia wrote:I guess I could have substituted the Hawks in instead. The statement still holds true.

Well no. TBR were bragging while wholesale cheating, don't think we can put TBH in the same category as them. You can certainly try but you won't be making many friends that way.

Drop Your Pants wrote:

Wayneactia wrote:I guess I could have substituted the Hawks in instead. The statement still holds true.

Well no. TBR were bragging while wholesale cheating, don't think we can put TBH in the same category as them. You can certainly try but you won't be making many friends that way.

I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on NS history as a lot of it is way before my time, but even TBR's successor regions got into trouble for cheating and got deleted by the Moderators. I think that says a lot about them.

The Reformed American Republic wrote:

Drop Your Pants wrote:Well no. TBR were bragging while wholesale cheating, don't think we can put TBH in the same category as them. You can certainly try but you won't be making many friends that way.

I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on NS history as a lot of it is way before my time, but even TBR's successor regions got into trouble for cheating and got deleted by the Moderators. I think that says a lot about them.

Yup. It's glad to see NSGers branch out though

Boda wrote:

The Reformed American Republic wrote:I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on NS history as a lot of it is way before my time, but even TBR's successor regions got into trouble for cheating and got deleted by the Moderators. I think that says a lot about them.

Yup. It's glad to see NSGers branch out though

Is it? Is it though?

Varanius wrote:

Boda wrote:Yup. It's glad to see NSGers branch out though

Is it? Is it though?

If they have something to add to the conversation, by all means. If not, no. Unfortunately, the latter situation is quite common compared to the former.

The New Cordian Empire wrote:

Varanius wrote:Is it? Is it though?

If they have something to add to the conversation, by all means. If not, no. Unfortunately, the latter situation is quite common compared to the former.

I'm not here to be a nuisance if that's what you're wondering.

Boda wrote:

The Reformed American Republic wrote:I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on NS history as a lot of it is way before my time, but even TBR's successor regions got into trouble for cheating and got deleted by the Moderators. I think that says a lot about them.

Yup. It's glad to see NSGers branch out though

Thanks man.

NSGers made up a decent proportion of temporary UDL troops back in the day. Helped 'win' that first Balder update for the UDL.

The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:NSGers made up a decent proportion of temporary UDL troops back in the day. Helped 'win' that first Balder update for the UDL.

NSG is not the topic of this thread, nor is Unibot’s shambolic management of Balder.

I’d appreciate if y’all could talk about how good TGW is instead

Tim-Opolis wrote:

The Notorious Mad Jack wrote:NSGers made up a decent proportion of temporary UDL troops back in the day. Helped 'win' that first Balder update for the UDL.

NSG is not the topic of this thread, nor is Unibot’s shambolic management of Balder.

I’d appreciate if y’all could talk about how good TGW is instead

I do appreciate you guys thwarting a quorum raid that was attempted on my region. If it wasn't for you guys it would have been another annoying 12 hours with an improper delegate.

The Reformed American Republic wrote:

Tim-Opolis wrote:NSG is not the topic of this thread, nor is Unibot’s shambolic management of Balder.

I’d appreciate if y’all could talk about how good TGW is instead

I do appreciate you guys thwarting a quorum raid that was attempted on my region. If it wasn't for you guys it would have been another annoying 12 hours with an improper delegate.

They didn't see the communist and fascist embassies. I told you, getting rid of them will do you good!

Parxland wrote:

The Reformed American Republic wrote:I do appreciate you guys thwarting a quorum raid that was attempted on my region. If it wasn't for you guys it would have been another annoying 12 hours with an improper delegate.

They didn't see the communist and fascist embassies. I told you, getting rid of them will do you good!

They hold multiple fascist embassies. Seems like someone may have dropped the ball on this one.

Wayneactia wrote:

Parxland wrote:
They didn't see the communist and fascist embassies. I told you, getting rid of them will do you good!

They hold multiple fascist embassies. Seems like someone may have dropped the ball on this one.

It seems I need to get into a habit of consistently dunking on you, and your once again flawed perspective - based on an unclear perception of the situation. From a glance, we were chasing LILY in that defense. LILY jumps like 5 times a minute. If you’re taking time to look where they’re jumping, or analyze the region afterwards, you’re doing a shitty job at chasing. Sometimes this results in less than savory regions defended when the trigger is too tight for us to u-turn. It’s really exhausting seeing players who lack experience and are unskilled with fast-paced updating attempt to hold these stances.

TGW is a pretty openly Leftist region. Rest assured we don’t intentionally defend fash.

Tim-Opolis wrote:

Wayneactia wrote:They hold multiple fascist embassies. Seems like someone may have dropped the ball on this one.

TGW is a pretty openly Leftist region. Rest assured we don’t intentionally defend fash.

Ok, this is epic.

Honeydewistania wrote:

Tim-Opolis wrote:
TGW is a pretty openly Leftist region. Rest assured we don’t intentionally defend fash.

Ok, this is epic.

Statements of fact are 'epic' now?

Tim-Opolis wrote:

Wayneactia wrote:They hold multiple fascist embassies. Seems like someone may have dropped the ball on this one.

It seems I need to get into a habit of consistently dunking on you, and your once again flawed perspective - based on an unclear perception of the situation. From a glance, we were chasing LILY in that defense. LILY jumps like 5 times a minute. If you’re taking time to look where they’re jumping, or analyze the region afterwards, you’re doing a shitty job at chasing. Sometimes this results in less than savory regions defended when the trigger is too tight for us to u-turn. It’s really exhausting seeing players who lack experience and are unskilled with fast-paced updating attempt to hold these stances.

TGW is a pretty openly Leftist region. Rest assured we don’t intentionally defend fash.

Dunk away Tim, dunk away. I am like a pretzel, I absorb salt.

But thanks for the explanation any way. I am pretty aware of TGW's leanings. I was pretty sure you didn't defend a fascist region on purpose.

Honeydewistania wrote:

Tim-Opolis wrote:
TGW is a pretty openly Leftist region. Rest assured we don’t intentionally defend fash.

Ok, this is epic.

How? It's common knowledge. It's not like the TGW just all of a sudden came out as anti-fascist, leftists. They were a pretty big wheel in CAIN.