Pretty much. I wouldn’t call Kyrie “normal,” but comparing the two is a bit of a stretch.
Advertisement
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Aug 21, 2019 9:50 am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Sweeze » Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:00 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:04 pm
Kurnugia wrote:Hot take: The reason why the daddy report format is so attractive, is because it make TBH cringe at it.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Cormactopia Prime » Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:07 pm
by Lord Dominator » Wed Aug 21, 2019 2:10 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Are you people actually arguing about raid/defense report themes?
by Blight-Bane » Wed Aug 21, 2019 3:58 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Aug 21, 2019 4:07 pm
Blight-Bane wrote:Iirc, there was a lot of taggers out (was that all of you? ), some fendas were on, stuff happened. At the end of update we felt pretty good about the way things turned out. I'm sure y'all did too. Why we're heckling each other's report is beyond me. I'd say take it all with a grain of salt, but..
GG Fendas, GG Hawks.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Cormactopia Prime » Wed Aug 21, 2019 4:13 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Blight-Bane wrote:Iirc, there was a lot of taggers out (was that all of you? ), some fendas were on, stuff happened. At the end of update we felt pretty good about the way things turned out. I'm sure y'all did too. Why we're heckling each other's report is beyond me. I'd say take it all with a grain of salt, but..
GG Fendas, GG Hawks.
I think various Hawks have made it more than clear over the past two years that this, especially at this frequency and degree of repetition, makes some of our folks a little uncomfortable and a lot weirded out. I and others have asked with varying degrees of nicety that it kindly go die in a fire. Not caring, okay, i can get, but I’m not quite sure how that’s beyond you as a concept.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Aug 21, 2019 4:32 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:
I think various Hawks have made it more than clear over the past two years that this, especially at this frequency and degree of repetition, makes some of our folks a little uncomfortable and a lot weirded out. I and others have asked with varying degrees of nicety that it kindly go die in a fire. Not caring, okay, i can get, but I’m not quite sure how that’s beyond you as a concept.
Have you considered the possibility that your reaction is why they do it?
They're not here to be sensitive to your preferences, and you're frankly making a mountain out of a mole hill. It looks petty.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Latrovia » Thu Aug 22, 2019 1:01 am
by Roavin » Thu Aug 22, 2019 9:11 am
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:...you do realize that that's about the objectively worst way to get someone to stop doing something likely intended to annoy/confuse you and waste your time? Telling them it annoyed you, confused you, and wasted your time?
by Miporin » Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:15 am
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:49 am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Scottiesland » Thu Aug 22, 2019 12:21 pm
by WayNeacTia » Thu Aug 22, 2019 1:29 pm
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Roavin » Thu Aug 22, 2019 1:55 pm
Miporin wrote:Lmao, what kind of petty do you have to be to not only double down on the daddy shit,
Miporin wrote:but also dig up a quote well over a year and a half old?
Miporin wrote:Are we going to crack down on anyone who says anything remotely contradictory, regardless of context or timeframe? 'cause that sounds like a neat idea.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:What would be annoying, and also normal, would be something like, say, co-opting the well-established “hatchlings” label we use for our little trainee Hawks, and going on about the little birdies making a mess, shitting everywhere, whatever. That would be annoying, and absolutely fair play, quite relevant, all that jazz. Same result, more sensical.
Miporin wrote:All that notwithstanding, Souls is neither the only one uncomfortable over this stuff, nor the only one who's spoken out about it.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:This? This, and it’s connotations, make people uncomfortable. That’s the difference. I’m not sure if you legitimately don’t see that, or do and are fine with it.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:some weird ass infantilization/ageplay shit
Scottiesland wrote:Thanks for letting me know that we can make raid reports based around our kinks and stuff... Waiting for the kink-related raider groups to show up.
Latrovia wrote:I agree with EWS, and the vulgarity behind TGW's post is phenomenally inappropriate and to some extend NSFW as well.
by Wabbitslayah » Thu Aug 22, 2019 2:04 pm
by Cormactopia Prime » Thu Aug 22, 2019 3:36 pm
Cormac Today at 5:48 PM
I agree it's an absurd argument, primarily because it pales in comparison to the truly nasty shit that goes on in gameplay, and I think people in TBH are ill served by their superiors acting like this is a big deal. If they think this makes them uncomfortable they're unprepared for the worse shit they're likely to face.
But just to be clear, TGW's "daddy" thing is bizarre and juvenile, and they should probably cut it out.
Cormac Today at 5:50 PM
I've had some conversations and I really don't think it's manufactured drama, it's genuinely making some people uncomfortable. I think they need to grow a thicker skin if they're going to participate in gameplay, but I also think TGW should stop doing something that is clearly making people uncomfortable at an OOC level.
Cormac Today at 5:53 PM
I wouldn't go so far as to call it "toxic" in the actionable sense, but really, just stop.
by Aclion » Thu Aug 22, 2019 5:21 pm
Scottiesland wrote:Thanks for letting me know that we can make raid reports based around our kinks and stuff... Waiting for the kink-related raider groups to show up.
by Reploid Productions » Thu Aug 22, 2019 6:02 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Let me just copy what I said in the NSGP server as an addendum to what I said yesterday, because I think I was being somewhat unfair to TBH's concerns:Cormac Today at 5:48 PM
I agree it's an absurd argument, primarily because it pales in comparison to the truly nasty shit that goes on in gameplay, and I think people in TBH are ill served by their superiors acting like this is a big deal. If they think this makes them uncomfortable they're unprepared for the worse shit they're likely to face.
But just to be clear, TGW's "daddy" thing is bizarre and juvenile, and they should probably cut it out.
Cormac Today at 5:50 PM
I've had some conversations and I really don't think it's manufactured drama, it's genuinely making some people uncomfortable. I think they need to grow a thicker skin if they're going to participate in gameplay, but I also think TGW should stop doing something that is clearly making people uncomfortable at an OOC level.
Cormac Today at 5:53 PM
I wouldn't go so far as to call it "toxic" in the actionable sense, but really, just stop.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by United Republic Empire » Fri Aug 23, 2019 1:02 am
Roavin wrote:Miporin wrote:Lmao, what kind of petty do you have to be to not only double down on the daddy shit,
petty:
1 Of little importance; trivial.
1.1 Unduly concerned with trivial matters, especially in a small-minded or spiteful way.
2 Of secondary or lesser importance, rank, or scale; minor.
Are you sure that's the correct adjective?Miporin wrote:but also dig up a quote well over a year and a half old?
That quote is solid advice. 2019 Souls would do well to heed 2017 Souls' advice.Miporin wrote:Are we going to crack down on anyone who says anything remotely contradictory, regardless of context or timeframe? 'cause that sounds like a neat idea.
As if that was never done before in the history of NS.Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:What would be annoying, and also normal, would be something like, say, co-opting the well-established “hatchlings” label we use for our little trainee Hawks, and going on about the little birdies making a mess, shitting everywhere, whatever. That would be annoying, and absolutely fair play, quite relevant, all that jazz. Same result, more sensical.
That's actually legitimately a neat idea, but I doubt that it would have the "same result", given that then it'd be sanctioned by yourself and, presumably, not have you up in arms about it like this does. But if you'd like, I can put in a word with the Wardens to see if they'd be interested in using your pre-approved GP report rhetoric going forward. I'm sure they'll be receptive to it.Miporin wrote:All that notwithstanding, Souls is neither the only one uncomfortable over this stuff, nor the only one who's spoken out about it.Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:This? This, and it’s connotations, make people uncomfortable. That’s the difference. I’m not sure if you legitimately don’t see that, or do and are fine with it.
Oh, so it took 2-3 years for you to choose to be uncomfortable about it. Sorry, I wasn't informed of that change in policy.Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:some weird ass infantilization/ageplay shitScottiesland wrote:Thanks for letting me know that we can make raid reports based around our kinks and stuff... Waiting for the kink-related raider groups to show up.Latrovia wrote:I agree with EWS, and the vulgarity behind TGW's post is phenomenally inappropriate and to some extend NSFW as well.
NSFW? Kink? Really?
Get your minds out of the gutter, people. Not everything is always innuendo. My RL daughter calls me "Daddy" when we're speaking english, do I have to call CPS on myself now? ffs
by Latrovia » Fri Aug 23, 2019 1:21 am
Roavin wrote:Latrovia wrote:I agree with EWS, and the vulgarity behind TGW's post is phenomenally inappropriate and to some extend NSFW as well.
NSFW? Kink? Really?
Get your minds out of the gutter, people. Not everything is always innuendo. My RL daughter calls me "Daddy" when we're speaking english, do I have to call CPS on myself now? ffs
by Roavin » Fri Aug 23, 2019 3:07 am
United Republic Empire wrote:But when a grown ass male is talking to someone a lot younger than themselves and referring to themself as the stranger's "daddy" - yeah that seems perfectly normal and not sexual in any way.
Latrovia wrote:its totally creepy and inappropriate when you call yourself someone else's daddy online
Latrovia wrote: I still can't see it any other way around except the NSFW intention was put up behind this comment.
Reploid Productions wrote:The fact that the response to basically "Guys, seriously, this isn't funny anymore and it's really kinda creepy/uncomfortable, please stop." seems to have been so far "Lawl, deal with it." is seriously disappointing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Communism Pride, Dreadton, Dyanderna, Far Clae Kort, Google [Bot], Opiralos, Varanius, Wintermoot
Advertisement