Cormactopia Prime wrote:Drake fraternized with the enemy and wrote:Cormac, did you even follow this campaign at all? Ankh Mauta *WAS* liberated, with like 63 endos on the native, overcoming a massive pile. That is the definition of success. The native not logging in and control flipping back to the raiders later does not take away the successful liberation, it only takes away the liberation having an impact on the final outcome. We did our job, the native didn't do his, that is out of our control.
Re-liberation is what failed miserably. Refusing to recognize the initial liberation, though, is flat-out wrong. The raiders acknowledged it in the WFE and a handful even moved out, before realizing that the native wasn't logging in.
"The initial liberation" didn't last, and the region wasn't liberated. The Black Hawks ended their occupation voluntarily, on their own terms. If you want to try to spin a liberation attempt that ultimately failed into a success, well, okay? But when raiders end up back in the Delegacy and then end their occupation on their own terms, I really don't see much success for defenders in that. You still failed to end the raid.
I think you're missing the point, Cormac. We're not responsible for native incompetence. If not for the native not logging on, we wouldn't be having this conversation. And you know as well as I do that there's no way to force someone to do anything. We did everything we could to end it, and successfully, and we knew going in that the only way the operation was ever going to succeed from the outset was if the native actually logged on. We gave them all the tools they needed. It wasn't up to us to end the raid. It was up to the native, and they botched it.
And honestly? I could care less. You'd think with the amount of raiderhate he was posting on the RMB he'd at least check in more often. It's still a win in my book. Raiders conceded, we had 63 endos on the native, we overtook a 60+ raider pile. That's a win any day of the week.