Advertisement
by Reventus Koth » Wed Nov 01, 2023 9:00 am
Xanthal wrote:Only raiders can win in this war- a defender can keep them from winning one region, one update at a time, but there will always be the next region, the next update, and the next, forever.
by The Hinterplace » Wed Nov 01, 2023 12:21 pm
Improper Classifications wrote:The Hinterplace wrote:I don't even know why Kantrias has subsumed Arda when they can't even keep up their own region. By all accounts, Kantrias has been near death for quite a long time.
They've gone from 86 to 125 nations over the past month alone. Who are you asking for this information
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Wed Nov 01, 2023 12:36 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Onderkelkia » Wed Nov 01, 2023 12:48 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:If we want to get pedantic, alignment != ideology. The 11th Year Accords professed an Imperialist ideology that aligns with the ideology of Raider Unity to create areas of mutual interests and benefits.
The North Polish Union wrote:Of course, if the astute reader were to actually check the links which Onder has provided, they would notice that the first makes only one reference to 'Independence' and that it is not in relation to Kantrias at all ("Europeia is the modern paragon and leading power of Independence").
Kylia Quilor wrote:Europeia is the modern paragon and leading power of Independence, that ideal of free action in pursuit of individual interest, unrestrained by raider and defender partisanship. As Imperialists, we walk in that same intellectual tradition, and so it makes sense for us to ally on that alone. We share a common worldview, have common interests.
The North Polish Union wrote:That leaves us with a dispatch of a nearly-decade-old document published by North East Somerset, a nation whose primary claim to fame is lying to both sides of the Milograd TSP coup in an attempt to further his own interests in the region, and we are expected to take its contents at face value.
by JayDee II » Wed Nov 01, 2023 1:20 pm
In my capacity as Queen of Kantrias, I sign the Independence Manifesto, as the Council of Nobles has voted to agree that that Kantrias sign the Manifesto.
Name: Kylia Basilissa Regina Quilor
Position: Queen of Kantrias, Gavel and Sword of the Realm
Region: Kantrias
by Vleerian Ravagia » Wed Nov 01, 2023 2:19 pm
Onderkelkia wrote:Whatever is being attempted with "The 11th Year Accords" does not mean that it can be read back into Kantrias history as its eternal view. Kantrias is within its rights to change its ideology/alignment and players can debate the merits of that, but its previous positions cannot be rewritten retrospectively.
The Hinterplace wrote:Maybe Arran Drake the Pretender should brush up on his own region’s history.
The Hinterplace wrote:An Aes Sedai does not share her eyes and ears with anyone.
by North East Somerset » Wed Nov 01, 2023 2:58 pm
JayDee II wrote:For those who aren't PNG'd in Europeia https://forums.europeians.com/index.php ... t-10094409
Maybe PNGs can see it too but idk
by Wascoitan » Wed Nov 01, 2023 3:12 pm
by Eternal Algerstonia » Wed Nov 01, 2023 4:21 pm
by Antovign » Thu Nov 02, 2023 6:31 am
by Omnicontrol » Sat Nov 04, 2023 2:52 am
Antovign wrote:It's endlessly amusing to me that none of the original founders of Arda are actually against this, but there MUST be CONTROVERSY RAH RAH RAH! So let us dig up stuff from years ago and slap it in everyone's face so we feel better about being petty.
Last I checked this thread was about Kantrias 'subsuming' Arda, not picking apart one thing that was misspoken? But alas, none of this is that unexpected. I genuinely expect some kind of snarky tear down for this, too.
United Calanworie wrote:It only is "absent" in F7 because nobody previews their posts because they're trying to move at the speed of mach fuck to not get ninjd.
Reventus Koth wrote:you're right guys my bad the next time i write a treaty i'll make sure to leave the possibility of raiding the other signatory on the table
Mlakhavia wrote:TCB arent fascists, we are simply the People
the People have a Stick
We use it to Whack piddly rightist frontiers
United Calanworie wrote:Us mods don't do shit.
[violet] wrote:lol
United Calanworie wrote:what in tarnation
by Delta-8 » Tue Nov 21, 2023 7:21 pm
by Improper Classifications » Tue Nov 21, 2023 8:11 pm
by Josi Sedai and Her Warder I » Tue Nov 21, 2023 8:55 pm
by Roanoke Colony » Tue Nov 21, 2023 9:24 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Nov 21, 2023 9:31 pm
Josi Sedai and Her Warder I wrote:I am not surprised the Pretender approved the raid of a target that really isn’t interesting at all — a month old region with 45 nations and 1 Endorsement. A weak and feeble choice made with a petty spirit.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Omnicontrol » Tue Nov 21, 2023 11:43 pm
Josi Sedai and Her Warder I wrote:I am not surprised the Pretender approved the raid of a target that really isn’t interesting at all — a month old region with 45 nations and 1 Endorsement. A weak and feeble choice made with a petty spirit.
United Calanworie wrote:It only is "absent" in F7 because nobody previews their posts because they're trying to move at the speed of mach fuck to not get ninjd.
Reventus Koth wrote:you're right guys my bad the next time i write a treaty i'll make sure to leave the possibility of raiding the other signatory on the table
Mlakhavia wrote:TCB arent fascists, we are simply the People
the People have a Stick
We use it to Whack piddly rightist frontiers
United Calanworie wrote:Us mods don't do shit.
[violet] wrote:lol
United Calanworie wrote:what in tarnation
by Terra Inferiori Reliquere » Wed Nov 22, 2023 5:19 am
Josi Sedai and Her Warder I wrote:I am not surprised the Pretender approved the raid of a target that really isn’t interesting at all — a month old region with 45 nations and 1 Endorsement. A weak and feeble choice made with a petty spirit.
by Terra Inferiori Reliquere » Sun Nov 26, 2023 9:18 am
Statement on the Termination of Diplomatic Relations with the Holy Utopian Empire
Moments ago, the Imperial Citizens of Kantrias as well as all foreign Ambassadors and Visitors present were informed of the termination of all diplomatic relations with the Holy Utopian Empire (HUE).
In my communiqué to HUE's Minister of Foreign Affairs, I stated the following;His Imperial Majesty the Emperor wrote:Minister of Foreign Affairs Unike,
I am writing to bring to your immediate attention a matter of utmost urgency pertaining to the actions of an individual associated with the Holy Utopian Empire, known on Discord as 'neoniantechnocracydystopia1240' and identified as the Holy Utopian Empire's Minister of Defense under the NS name 'Atomtopia.'
Approximately 30 minutes ago, I identified text messages containing extremist, fascist, genocide-denialist, and other problematic content from the aforementioned individual. This is in direct violation of the Empire of Kantrias’ zero-tolerance policy on fascism and related matters.
In accordance with our commitment to safeguarding Imperial Citizens from potential harm posed by such vile individuals, I hereby declare the immediate termination of all diplomatic relations between the Empire of Kantrias and the Holy Utopian Empire. Consequently, the embassy allocated to the Holy Utopian Empire is to be dismantled forthwith.
It is pertinent to note that the Empire of Kantrias has meticulously documented transcripts of the objectionable text history attributed to Atomtopia. In the spirit of fostering inter-regional cooperation and ensuring the collective security of our allies, the Empire of Kantrias has disseminated these transcripts among its diplomatic partners.
Your prompt attention to this matter is earnestly requested, and I remain at your disposal for any further clarifications or discussions deemed necessary.
His Imperial Majesty the Emperor,
Arran Drake “Skar” Quilor
The transcripts are being maintained by Kantrias and will be distributed as deemed necessary by the Imperial Government.
I will reiterate that the Empire of Kantrias has a strict zero-tolerance policy on fascism and related matters. If HUE's WAD had not voted For the SC Resolution "Liberate The Crown Dependency Of Hong Kong" as well as SC Resolution "Injunct The Crown Dependency Of Hong Kong", or otherwise hadn't gone out of their way to make enemies of us at their every turn (flying HUE flags during liberation attempts of Hong Kong for example), this matter could possibly have been resolved privately.
In short:
Diplomatic relations with HUE have been terminated.
Embassies maintained with HUE have been deconstructed.
by UPC » Sun Nov 26, 2023 9:55 am
Terra Inferiori Reliquere wrote:If HUE's WAD had not voted For the SC Resolution "Liberate The Crown Dependency Of Hong Kong" as well as SC Resolution "Injunct The Crown Dependency Of Hong Kong", or otherwise hadn't gone out of their way to make enemies of us at their every turn (flying HUE flags during liberation attempts of Hong Kong for example), this matter could possibly have been resolved privately.
by Terra Inferiori Reliquere » Sun Nov 26, 2023 10:05 am
UPC wrote:Terra Inferiori Reliquere wrote:If HUE's WAD had not voted For the SC Resolution "Liberate The Crown Dependency Of Hong Kong" as well as SC Resolution "Injunct The Crown Dependency Of Hong Kong", or otherwise hadn't gone out of their way to make enemies of us at their every turn (flying HUE flags during liberation attempts of Hong Kong for example), this matter could possibly have been resolved privately.
In what world is this an appropriate conclusion to an announcement that you are terminating relations with a region over allegations of fascism?
by UPC » Sun Nov 26, 2023 10:52 am
Terra Inferiori Reliquere wrote:UPC wrote:In what world is this an appropriate conclusion to an announcement that you are terminating relations with a region over allegations of fascism?
The statement is about a single member of HUE - namely their Minister of Defense; 'neoniantechnocracydystopia1240'/'Atomtopia'. If relations between Kantrias and HUE had been more amicable from the start, we would have reached out privately to urge them to purge the fascist element from their ranks. However, since they have been openly - and obviously - against Kantrias, we decided to do so publicly and without prior nor private communication with HUE.
by Terra Inferiori Reliquere » Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:13 am
UPC wrote:Terra Inferiori Reliquere wrote:The statement is about a single member of HUE - namely their Minister of Defense; 'neoniantechnocracydystopia1240'/'Atomtopia'. If relations between Kantrias and HUE had been more amicable from the start, we would have reached out privately to urge them to purge the fascist element from their ranks. However, since they have been openly - and obviously - against Kantrias, we decided to do so publicly and without prior nor private communication with HUE.
I am surprised that you are willing to admit so openly that you base your responses to OOC issues on what is convenient for you IC. Aren't you an admin in Kantrias?
If a region hosts content so concerning that you feel the need to make a public statement condemning it (note that I have not seen any of the content identified by Skar in his announcement, possibly because he has only deigned to share that OOC content with his IC diplomatic partners), the IC consequences of addressing and responding to that behavior should be the least of your concerns.
by Vleerian » Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:21 am
UPC wrote:possibly because he has only deigned to share that OOC content with his IC diplomatic partners
by Chacapoya » Sun Nov 26, 2023 11:35 am
Advertisement
Advertisement