
by The Blue Chocobo » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:25 pm

by The Blue Chocobo » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:35 pm

by Greater Rhodes » Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:08 pm

by Vostria » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:17 am

by The Blue Chocobo » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:30 pm

by East Fancainia » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:32 pm

by Bavin » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:33 pm


by The Blue Chocobo » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:36 pm
by Kahanistan » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:37 pm

by The Blue Chocobo » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:40 pm

by Bavin » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:45 pm
The Blue Chocobo wrote:yes, that is true. a modification of the water tight suit to kevlar of varying weight could make them more land suited

by Skibereen » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:45 pm

by The Blue Chocobo » Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:52 pm

by Vostria » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:06 pm

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:14 pm

by The Blue Chocobo » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:54 pm

by Bavin » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:46 pm
The Blue Chocobo wrote:i intend to use them as capital guards

by The Blue Chocobo » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:02 pm

by The Scandinvans » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:03 pm
Can you have their armor in MT, certainly.The Blue Chocobo wrote:A few friends and i have discussed whether real Big Daddies could be created and used for combat purposes. I would love to here from some other nations. Would it be possible to create Big Daddies? And if created, what could their place be in a military?
Try to consider the specific models of Big Daddies.

by Greater Americania » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:03 pm

by The Anglo-Saxon Empire » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:04 pm
The Blue Chocobo wrote:tanks are large, slower and armored. why does this not apply to those as well.
and if a tank spots a humvee, the humvee cant really escape now can it and it will surely be gone if the tank gets a shot off-which it certainly would due to modern targeting systems- yet humvees are still viable. so...explain how these things are different

by A mean old man » Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Astrobolt, Belarusball, The Ambis
Advertisement