Block II wrote:I've never used or endorsed predator. I'd like the ruling against me reversed.
Awww.. I wanted to make that joke.. you beat me too it..
Advertisement
by Vando0sa » Sat Jun 11, 2016 3:49 am
Block II wrote:I've never used or endorsed predator. I'd like the ruling against me reversed.
by Evil Wolf » Sat Jun 11, 2016 9:30 pm
Luziyca wrote:If this punishment gets repealed, then how long will it take until those people on that list claim that they were railroaded?
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Pro Life Nation » Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:37 pm
by Luxdonia » Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:39 pm
Pro Life Nation wrote:As I currently understand the situation, Texasa did have Predator on his computer at one point but never ran the program. He was only a private in DEN and never participated in any actual raids. If the only evidence that Texasa used predator is his confession, I ask that his penalty be dismissed. In that confession, he had a confused idea of what predator was, thinking that it was related to NS++.
Thank you for your consideration. I hope this is resolved in the fairest possible way.
Note: This appeal was written by a third-party.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:50 pm
Ovybia wrote:I will be posting the final appeal here when it is ready for submission.
Pro Life Nation wrote:As I currently understand the situation, Texasa did have Predator on his computer at one point but never ran the program. He was only a private in DEN and never participated in any actual raids. If the only evidence that Texasa used predator is his confession, I ask that his penalty be dismissed. In that confession, he had a confused idea of what predator was, thinking that it was related to NS++.
Thank you for your consideration. I hope this is resolved in the fairest possible way.
Note: This appeal was written by a third-party.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by General Knot » Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:52 pm
Pro Life Nation wrote:As I currently understand the situation, Texasa did have Predator on his computer at one point but never ran the program... If the only evidence that Texasa used predator is his confession...
by Gest II » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:04 pm
by We Are Not the NSA » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:09 pm
Pro Life Nation wrote:As I currently understand the situation, Texasa did have Predator on his computer at one point but never ran the program. He was only a private in DEN and never participated in any actual raids. If the only evidence that Texasa used predator is his confession, I ask that his penalty be dismissed. In that confession, he had a confused idea of what predator was, thinking that it was related to NS++.
Thank you for your consideration. I hope this is resolved in the fairest possible way.
Note: This appeal was written by a third-party.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Armed Citizens » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:19 pm
written by someone else =/= posted by someone elseWe Are Not the NSA wrote:Pro Life Nation wrote:As I currently understand the situation, Texasa did have Predator on his computer at one point but never ran the program. He was only a private in DEN and never participated in any actual raids. If the only evidence that Texasa used predator is his confession, I ask that his penalty be dismissed. In that confession, he had a confused idea of what predator was, thinking that it was related to NS++.
Thank you for your consideration. I hope this is resolved in the fairest possible way.
Note: This appeal was written by a third-party.
Lying will will only set back your cause.
by We Are Not the NSA » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:24 pm
Armed Citizens wrote:written by someone else =/= posted by someone elseWe Are Not the NSA wrote:Lying will will only set back your cause.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Ovybia » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:35 pm
Pro Life Nation wrote:As I currently understand the situation, Texasa did have Predator on his computer at one point but never ran the program. He was only a private in DEN and never participated in any actual raids. If the only evidence that Texasa used predator is his confession, I ask that his penalty be dismissed. In that confession, he had a confused idea of what predator was, thinking that it was related to NS++.
Thank you for your consideration. I hope this is resolved in the fairest possible way.
Note: This appeal was written by a third-party.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Please tell me this is not that product of two weeks' work. Please?
Please approve Child Destruction Ban. If you don't, the Ovybian dragon will come eat you. | Prolife? Consider joining Right to Life, one of the 100 largest regions of NS | Signature Details |
Practicing courteousness in an NS argument never hurt anyone.
Disclaimer: Admittedly sometimes I need to take my own advice.
by Christian Democrats » Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:34 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Guy » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:45 am
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Ovybia wrote:I will be posting the final appeal here when it is ready for submission.Pro Life Nation wrote:As I currently understand the situation, Texasa did have Predator on his computer at one point but never ran the program. He was only a private in DEN and never participated in any actual raids. If the only evidence that Texasa used predator is his confession, I ask that his penalty be dismissed. In that confession, he had a confused idea of what predator was, thinking that it was related to NS++.
Thank you for your consideration. I hope this is resolved in the fairest possible way.
Note: This appeal was written by a third-party.
Please tell me this is not that product of two weeks' work. Please?
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
by Lalaq » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:36 pm
Gest II wrote:Pro Life Nation wrote:Texasa Is innocent, His Puppet Boscovs Was the menace behind this.
I don't know Texasa but I'm pretty sure he is being railroaded since his conviction is likely based on him being reported for what he said in this forum: http://w11.zetaboards.com/NS_Right_to_Life
"I am Used to their Tool Known as Predator, In which produces multiple puppets at once, 1 of which is a WA puppet."
Someone who made such a statement clearly has no actual idea what it does and it would be foolish to punish someone based on such a fantastical confession.
I'd bet money he was talking about making puppets using NS++ which he confused into Predator, and then he was asked to confess.
by Pro Life Nation » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:32 pm
by Ovybia » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:48 pm
Pro Life Nation wrote:Found My Puppet's Account on DEN's off-site forum! Boscov's is convicted! Texasa is innocent! Boscov's is Texasa's Puppet! http://w11.zetaboards.com/DEN/profile/4181155/
Please approve Child Destruction Ban. If you don't, the Ovybian dragon will come eat you. | Prolife? Consider joining Right to Life, one of the 100 largest regions of NS | Signature Details |
Practicing courteousness in an NS argument never hurt anyone.
Disclaimer: Admittedly sometimes I need to take my own advice.
by Guy » Fri Jun 17, 2016 7:13 pm
Pro Life Nation wrote:Found My Puppet's Account on DEN's off-site forum! Boscov's is convicted! Texasa is innocent! Boscov's is Texasa's Puppet! http://w11.zetaboards.com/DEN/profile/4181155/
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
by Pro Life Nation » Sat Jun 18, 2016 5:57 am
Guy wrote:Pro Life Nation wrote:Found My Puppet's Account on DEN's off-site forum! Boscov's is convicted! Texasa is innocent! Boscov's is Texasa's Puppet! http://w11.zetaboards.com/DEN/profile/4181155/
You realise that it doesn't matter which puppet of yours was on the DEN forum, so long as it was one of your puppets?
Honestly since you appear to want this punishment so much, even confessing to something you didn't do, for attention or otherwise, maybe we should just let you have it?
by Kshrlmnt » Sat Jun 18, 2016 6:08 am
Pro Life Nation wrote:Guy wrote:You realise that it doesn't matter which puppet of yours was on the DEN forum, so long as it was one of your puppets?
Honestly since you appear to want this punishment so much, even confessing to something you didn't do, for attention or otherwise, maybe we should just let you have it?
Well,That's not true, Texasa Was never in Den, (look at my nation's history) But Boscov's was.
by Leafish » Sat Jun 18, 2016 6:14 am
Pro Life Nation wrote:Guy wrote:You realise that it doesn't matter which puppet of yours was on the DEN forum, so long as it was one of your puppets?
Honestly since you appear to want this punishment so much, even confessing to something you didn't do, for attention or otherwise, maybe we should just let you have it?
Well,That's not true, Texasa Was never in Den, (look at my nation's history) But Boscov's was.
by Sygian II » Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:00 am
Leafish wrote:'Raiders are lame'.
Benevolent Thomas wrote:The Black Hawks continue to be the largest and most successful invader organization in NationStates
by Drasnia » Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:06 am
Leafish wrote:Pro Life Nation wrote:Well,That's not true, Texasa Was never in Den, (look at my nation's history) But Boscov's was.
Boscov is a puppet of yours, yes?
If so, which account's name you used when joining Den hardly matters, as far as innocence or guilt goes, since it's still the same person behind it.
For example, let's say I decided to create a new account for myself, under the name of, say, 'Raiders are lame'. Now, let's say I was to post spammy messages on someone's RMB, or the like. The fact that the deed happened under another name is by no means a writ of innocence on my part, regardless of whether it was under my usual name or not.
Now. This might be pure conjecture and overinterpretation, but I'd guess that, since the Den joining happened under the name of Boscov, you'd have preferred that, if any of your nations had been deleted over the Predator admission, it'd have been that one, rather than Texasa?
To put it shortly, it's unlikely to happen, since, if I'm not mistaken, Texasa was your main account.
by Luziyca » Sat Jun 18, 2016 9:15 am
Drasnia wrote:Leafish wrote:
Boscov is a puppet of yours, yes?
If so, which account's name you used when joining Den hardly matters, as far as innocence or guilt goes, since it's still the same person behind it.
For example, let's say I decided to create a new account for myself, under the name of, say, 'Raiders are lame'. Now, let's say I was to post spammy messages on someone's RMB, or the like. The fact that the deed happened under another name is by no means a writ of innocence on my part, regardless of whether it was under my usual name or not.
Now. This might be pure conjecture and overinterpretation, but I'd guess that, since the Den joining happened under the name of Boscov, you'd have preferred that, if any of your nations had been deleted over the Predator admission, it'd have been that one, rather than Texasa?
To put it shortly, it's unlikely to happen, since, if I'm not mistaken, Texasa was your main account.
However, the mods generally delete the offending puppet on the first DEATable offence, then the puppet and the main, pupetsweep, DOS.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Daphomir, Google [Bot], Gorutimania, Kumon, Nu Elysium, Rogue River, The Phantom Gambler
Advertisement