Cora II wrote:<snip>
Jakker wrote:Any nomination must come with an detailed explanation or will be discounted.
Advertisement
by Klaus Devestatorie » Sun Jun 21, 2015 5:13 am
by North East Somerset » Sun Jun 21, 2015 10:58 am
by RiderSyl » Sun Jun 21, 2015 11:13 am
by Apple-Loosa » Sun Jun 21, 2015 11:16 am
Ridersyl wrote:What you're describing is called "nostalgia", NES. It's par for the course in anything having to do with a Hall of Fame, or really, any award that has to do with "lifetime achievement".
There's no way to make a perfectly unbiased HoF.
by Blackbird » Sun Jun 21, 2015 11:18 am
North East Somerset wrote:There is always a risk with these sort of distant retrospective judgments. Partly exacerbated by the fact that a lot of the Judges don't cover the entire era. They are therefore reliant on sources, often significantly biased ones, for information on the earlier era to mix with their first hand knowledge of the later era. Thus to some extent you are comparing apples and oranges. There is thus always a temptation to look at earlier eras through "rose-tinted glasses". Hopefully it will be balanced out, but I am not going to be considering anyone who pre-dates my involvement in R/D.
by North East Somerset » Sun Jun 21, 2015 11:26 am
Apple-Loosa wrote:Ridersyl wrote:What you're describing is called "nostalgia", NES. It's par for the course in anything having to do with a Hall of Fame, or really, any award that has to do with "lifetime achievement".
There's no way to make a perfectly unbiased HoF.
Couldn't it just be graded upon the number of raids they've done? Then it's more simplistic...
by We Are Not the NSA » Sun Jun 21, 2015 11:27 am
Apple-Loosa wrote:Ridersyl wrote:What you're describing is called "nostalgia", NES. It's par for the course in anything having to do with a Hall of Fame, or really, any award that has to do with "lifetime achievement".
There's no way to make a perfectly unbiased HoF.
Couldn't it just be graded upon the number of raids they've done? Then it's more simplistic...
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Apple-Loosa » Sun Jun 21, 2015 11:30 am
We Are Not the NSA wrote:Apple-Loosa wrote:Couldn't it just be graded upon the number of raids they've done? Then it's more simplistic...
Number of raids doesn't really correlate to the amount of impact on R/D. Take Wulfenite for example. He doesn't tag raid, but he is one of the best infiltrators in the game, and contributed to several large invasions.
by WolfMac » Sun Jun 21, 2015 1:22 pm
North East Somerset wrote:There is always a risk with these sort of distant retrospective judgments. Partly exacerbated by the fact that a lot of the Judges don't cover the entire era. They are therefore reliant on sources, often significantly biased ones, for information on the earlier era to mix with their first hand knowledge of the later era. Thus to some extent you are comparing apples and oranges. There is thus always a temptation to look at earlier eras through "rose-tinted glasses". Hopefully it will be balanced out, but I am not going to be considering anyone who pre-dates my involvement in R/D.
by Zaolat » Sun Jun 21, 2015 2:57 pm
Trick Shot wrote:WraithFIN wrote:Nominations:
1. Coraxion:
- Has raided many updates (2/day usually)
-never lets anyone down with raiding, even raids when sick, drunk or computer tries to f*** around.
-Has invented multiple new systems to do while tag raiding.
-Always great ideas as raider.
-Happy mostly of the time
2. Myself, WraithFIN:
-Glorious one.
-Evil.
-Everyone "loves" Wraith.
-No more reasons unless judges do 'em
Self-nominations are usually considered unprofessional and in bad taste.
by Jakker » Sun Jun 21, 2015 7:17 pm
WolfMac wrote:North East Somerset wrote:There is always a risk with these sort of distant retrospective judgments. Partly exacerbated by the fact that a lot of the Judges don't cover the entire era. They are therefore reliant on sources, often significantly biased ones, for information on the earlier era to mix with their first hand knowledge of the later era. Thus to some extent you are comparing apples and oranges. There is thus always a temptation to look at earlier eras through "rose-tinted glasses". Hopefully it will be balanced out, but I am not going to be considering anyone who pre-dates my involvement in R/D.
I'm not saying you're wrong for taking this approach, and I somewhat agree with what you're saying, but I will point out that if all judges took this approach that would mean we couldn't consider anyone who was raiding prior to 2014, when the judge who most recently joined NationStates started playing.
I do think we should avoid going so far back that actual, unbiased source material can't be found, but I think we should also avoid ignoring the past in favor of the immediate present. Too often in NationStates these kinds of things are judged by what's happening right now rather than taking into account any history, and they become not so much reflective of real, lasting contribution but just whoever is well-known at the time of judging. I would hate to see that happen here.
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by WolfMac » Sun Jun 21, 2015 8:36 pm
Jakker wrote:The judges shouldn't feel pressured to vote as many ol timers as they can. I am aware that some judges are fairly new. The intention was to get various perspectives from different spheres and ages. The judges will change year to year, so if there are any potential players that are worthy of being inducted, but this year's judges do not consider or vote for them, there is always next year when other judges who may have a better understanding of a certain candidate will be in place. This is the first year, so one cannot expect everyone possibly deserving of being inducted to be so. The system isn't going to please everyone and I get that, but I think it is functionally sound.
by Marselesk » Mon Jun 22, 2015 1:03 pm
Revall wrote:I will train a flock of geese for 20 years as assassins and send them to find you kleo
John Jacob wrote:Your ability to make a convincing argument based on complete bullsh*t is very impressive
Raging Zen Master wrote:As subtle as "HELLO FELLOW HUMANS, I TOO, ENJOY BREATHING OXYGEN."
Knot/Ivo wrote:Nonsense, defender budgets are set to buying cushy armchairs, not bombers!
by Cora II » Mon Jun 22, 2015 1:14 pm
by Mikeswill » Mon Jun 22, 2015 1:46 pm
by Trick Shot » Mon Jun 22, 2015 1:53 pm
Mikeswill wrote:I have a feeling that I will be involved in one form or another.
There were Raiders back in 2004 that most of the forum players have never heard of such as Winky Woo and Mississippi Rio.
We shall see how this plays out.
Kisses
Marelius wrote:You got Festavo'd
Revall wrote:Festavo is an off his rocker cowboy capable of anything at the drop of a hat
Nuke wrote:But can you really be more dangerous than Festavo? Now that guy is a real fucking OG.
Valrifell wrote:God dammit Fest, you think too much!
by Jakker » Wed Jun 24, 2015 6:14 am
The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.
by The Stalker » Thu Jun 25, 2015 5:12 pm
by We Are Not the NSA » Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:07 pm
The Stalker wrote:I'm a little late to this thing, but RaiderCon looks pretty cool, surprised it hasn't been done sooner. I'd like to 2nd the nominations of Jakker and Evil Wolf, for reasons already provided in prior posts.
Also i'd like to unofficially nominate Ever-Wandering Souls, I don't have enough info to do a proper nomination for them, but they've always seemed to be a fairly classy raider, and I tend to hold that as the most important quality a real raider can have. Also pretty sure I saw them lead / oversee one of this years large raids, can't recall which or if i'm just mistaken.
Edit: It was the South Pacific! (If this is enough info, consider it an official nomination)
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:23 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Shadoke » Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:32 pm
by Trick Shot » Fri Jun 26, 2015 6:05 am
Marelius wrote:You got Festavo'd
Revall wrote:Festavo is an off his rocker cowboy capable of anything at the drop of a hat
Nuke wrote:But can you really be more dangerous than Festavo? Now that guy is a real fucking OG.
Valrifell wrote:God dammit Fest, you think too much!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Merlovich, The Way Sun Cooperation
Advertisement