Most of the drama in The South Pacific revolves around the level of animosity its users frequently hurl at each other as well as the conduct of the administrators. Like if you think I am critical of them; you should see how they talk to each other. A large part of the problem are the people they have holding these positions. People like Glen-Rhodes simply are not fit to be an administrator given their conduct towards other users and the frequent abuse of his position. You would think that people in TSP would demand better of their administrators, but he has enablers like Escade and others who frequently supports him. In fact, if you read the TSP threads you begin to a see a trend in terms of people and factions. It is always the same group of people who support and enable Glen-Rhodes and his agenda.
There are other fascinating arguments that are fairly unique to The South Pacific. Glen-Rhodes and his clique will dismiss any effort at establishing accountability as a tool that will only be used to pursue personal grudges. It is quite astonishing really, I have not heard such an argument in other regions. But it sure is useful when you are the one who people want to hold accountable and when you have done your job with many flaws. It's not a very democratic argument, that is certain and reminds me of efforts in countries like Brazil & Italy to keep politicians out of jail for crimes they committed.
