Raider Regions, Organizations and Affiliates

[Trick Shot]

This is a list of Raider regions that seize the WA Delegate spot of regions for various reasons. Contact the following officers listed below to raid or seek help with raiding.

The Black Riders (The Elite Calvary of NationStates)
Overlord: General Halcones Chief of Staff: KKnight

The Black Hawks (The Most Feared Military Organization in NationStates)
Commander In Chief: Red Back Head of Military: Jakker

The Brotherhood of Malice
The Brothers: Venico and Ambroscus Koth

Lone Wolves United (The Legendary Crasher Region)
Founder: Evil Wolf Military Leader: Tabaqui

Ceirien
Imperator: Marelius

The Imperialist Coalition
Lord Imperator: Licstinburg

Unknown
Archempress: Kshrlmnt

These regions aren't necessarily Raider regions, but have been involved in raiding:

The United Imperial Armed Forces
Joint Commander: Christopher Bishop

Osiris (Sekhmet Legion)
Pharaoh: Tim Stark Scribe of War: Trick Shot

Contact me to have your region name and appropriate officers added to the list. Special thanks to Cormac Stark for the inspiration.

Do not forget Sicarius! We are always watching!

[Corvus Corax]

Current TBR Chief is KKnight, but Marshals Gest and Bob Moran can be also contacted.

[Trick Shot]

Mistake in typing

[Shadoke]

The Imperialist Coalition and Licstinburg

For the will to raid, TEP and TWP could be contacted

[Valrifell]

Technically speaking, the UIAF is NOT a political identity or body all it's own (I.E. region), rather it's a tool used by Albion, The New Inquisition, and Land of Kings and Emperors. It should also be noted that all three of those regions have their own armed forces that don't always act under the UIAF.

[Xoriet]

Pretty sure TEP isn't anyone's personal raiding service, Shadoke. Read the EPSA Act and take a note on why we can only raid within certain bounds.

[Shadoke]

Pretty sure TEP isn't anyone's personal raiding service, Shadoke. Read the EPSA Act and take a note on why we can only raid within certain bounds.

Sorry, from my understanding of Independence you are an affiliate of raiding, technicality speak, but please link me so I can read

[Valrifell]

Pretty sure TEP isn't anyone's personal raiding service, Shadoke. Read the EPSA Act and take a note on why we can only raid within certain bounds.

Sorry, from my understanding of Independence you are an affiliate of raiding, technicality speak, but please link me so I can read

Independents view military ideology as a means of foreign policy and nothing more, that does not inherently mean that all Independents are raiders.

[Christopher Bishop]

Just for the record, I probably won't help you if you aren't in one the UIAF affiliated militaries or with a region we have worked with before.

[Shadoke]

Sorry, from my understanding of Independence you are an affiliate of raiding, technicality speak, but please link me so I can read

Independents view military ideology as a means of foreign policy and nothing more, that does not inherently mean that all Independents are raiders.

Wouldnt the same be said for Defending, and in that case a list should be made for independants, and imperialist. and Affiliates should be removed from both threads.

[Trick Shot]

Just for the record, I probably won't help you if you aren't in one the UIAF affiliated militaries or with a region we have worked with before.

This was made purely for fairness since there is another thread just like this for Defenders

[Xoriet]

Pretty sure TEP isn't anyone's personal raiding service, Shadoke. Read the EPSA Act and take a note on why we can only raid within certain bounds.

Sorry, from my understanding of Independence you are an affiliate of raiding, technicality speak, but please link me so I can read

I'll summarize it for you in one easy sentence unless you want to go to the TEP forums: Our raids (sans Warzones) are only ever justifiable by our political definition.

Which is not "raid all day every day whenever you want us to!" We are neither defender nor raider, and we are unaligned, not the independent-raider perspective. Our guidelines are in our Act, and we are a Regionalist military. Perhaps we lean more one way than another, but we are no ideology defined by the world.

[Shadoke]

Sorry, from my understanding of Independence you are an affiliate of raiding, technicality speak, but please link me so I can read

I'll summarize it for you in one easy sentence unless you want to go to the TEP forums: Our raids (sans Warzones) are only ever justifiable by our political definition.

Which is not "raid all day every day whenever you want us to!" We are neither defender nor raider, and we are unaligned, not the independent-raider perspective. Our guidelines are in our Act, and we are a Regionalist military. Perhaps we lean more one way than another, but we are no ideology defined by the world.

In that definition, is it justified to have you in the list of Defender regions?

[Corvus Corax]

Would it be good add regional tags of self identification to the list of regions, and by the corresponding leading representatives, not by public opinion? Maybe short describtion too?

Even Raiderdom as a whole isn't that unified and coherent then we often want believe ourself. No reasons to give false and limited, possibly confusing information in this kind thread. IMHO.

[Shadoke]

This is a list of Raider regions that seize the WA Delegate spot of regions for various reasons. Contact the following officers listed below to raid or seek help with raiding.
By this definition, any region that takes region B, will be raiders. This is obviously flawed because when a liberation happens and is successful, that makes liberators raiders, by these words.

[Corvus Corax]

This is a list of Raider regions that seize the WA Delegate spot of regions for various reasons. Contact the following officers listed below to raid or seek help with raiding.
By this definition, any region that takes region B, will be raiders. This is obviously flawed because when a liberation happens and is successful, that makes liberators raiders, by these words.

Shadoke. By that definition you can add NE, GGR, North Korea, The Red Fleet, The MT Army and Antifa, Libertatem, Reato etc. (mentioning now only few of most obvious established regions/organisations)

[Benevolent Thomas]

One of those rare moments where defenderum seems more unified than invaderdom. Let us enjoy this fleeting moment for as long as it lasts.

[Shadoke]

This is a list of Raider regions that seize the WA Delegate spot of regions for various reasons. Contact the following officers listed below to raid or seek help with raiding.
By this definition, any region that takes region B, will be raiders. This is obviously flawed because when a liberation happens and is successful, that makes liberators raiders, by these words.

Shadoke. By that definition you can add NE, GGR, North Korea, The Red Fleet, The MT Army and Antifa, Libertatem, Reato etc. (mentioning now only few of most obvious established regions/organisations)

My Point: The Defenderum and Raiderdom are to heavily diverse, as well as Imperialist, and Independants, in the mix to make a thread as such.

[Corvus Corax]

By Your definition, not mine Shad.

Add my little Cimmeria to the list too then. It's the Cradle of Future purist raider mercs. Different kind contracts can be made as long as they are offensive and do not contradict directly with Merc Contract #1 with TBR for years 2013-2020.

...to the Last, if possible.

[Xoriet]

Our treatied allies and friends to TEP and EPSA know how to contact us if they want our help,
Shadoke. Might want to ask the TBR GS if they'd want to work with EPSA as long as the nasty defender plague frolics alongside the raiders, imperialists, and bigameplayers of EPSA.

[Shadoke]

Our treatied allies and friends to TEP and EPSA know how to contact us if they want our help,
Shadoke. Might want to ask the TBR GS if they'd want to work with EPSA as long as the nasty defender plague frolics alongside the raiders, imperialists, and bigameplayers of EPSA.

Im trying to seek clarification for new people who may be confused by the Generality of this thread. I think there should be one for Pure Raiders, Pure Defenders, Independants, and Imperialists, and one super thread pinned at the top of the forum to link to each. there should be somewhat of a short descriptive paragraph(s) explaining what each is, and how they are different.

[Ambroscus Koth]

Alternatively, we can avoid dumb labels and just raid shit. That sounds like an A+ idea.

[Corvus Corax]

Alternatively, we can avoid dumb labels and just raid shit. That sounds like an A+ idea.

Actually... that is very good idea! Yes. Let's keep things simple.

[Jakker]

Alternatively, we can avoid dumb labels and just raid shit. That sounds like an A+ idea.

You're so dreamy, Koth

[Nephmir]

This, and the thread it was inspired by, just contributes further to defining the term "Defender" and "Raider" and expanding the shadow to discourage and kill off new groups with a different idea. Fresh ideas are what Gameplay needs, not a directory of regions with a defined black-and-white alignment. A list of Invader and Defender regions are already available here and here, while all known active Gameplay regions are listed here with their own custom description.