Yay! I'm important!
Advertisement
by Rifty » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:22 pm
Valrifell:
I know that.[b] I was (probably) going to get around to talking to Shadoke about merging (probably)[/size][/b]
Valrifell:
[b]It's a good thing, because we indirectly get access to those raiders in a more forthright manner. We go to one source rather than two now.
Still, it woulda been nice to have more people in Sicarius .[/size][/b]
[2:19:28 PM] EW Souls - Sicarius: Hey council member
[2:19:42 PM] EW Souls - Sicarius: why'd y'all merge with the effers who hated TCE from day one?
[2:19:50 PM] Mattias Nilsson: I resigned
[2:19:55 PM] EW Souls - Sicarius: Rather then those who've helped y'all.
[2:19:56 PM] EW Souls - Sicarius: oh
[2:19:59 PM] EW Souls - Sicarius: I see
by Nephmir » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:26 pm
GP References
Military Gameplay
Login Script
Manual Recruitment
The 300 Endorsements of Nephmir
"100 by land, 100 by air, 100 by sea."
Mercenary of The Sable Order
Commander in Project Soul
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:32 pm
NoblePhnx wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Personal attacks were unnecessary. The management of the region does however wish to express....dissatisfaction... with the lack of consideration given, especially in the middle of treaty negotiations. Regardless of sheets or whatnot being used, a human still went and replaced our tag - not a huge deal in the grand scheme of things really. What's objectionable is the lack of communication. We approached TBR and asked if we could potentially include their tags in our runs, whiles ago. The answer was yes, so long as we were fine with it occurring the other way around, and both parties left embassies with the originally tagging region. It's barely been mentioned since, once it was settled, and it's worked. There's no reason we wouldn't agree to the same with you, the objection is in the assumption that it was permissible, without anyone actually asking.
Not a great foot to set out on.
Yeah f8ck the treaty its causing unnecessary reasons for issues it was just a treaty signifying relations it got all blown out to hell along with some strange fear of Rift planning to push a merger that would NEVER happen or even be on the table that everyone involved knows full and well.
Shad who joined AoI yesterday got the sheet from Trick now Trick says he told Shad not to hit the same targets well that's between the two of them who until yesterday might I remind you were both TCE so that does not fall on us. It's not a lack of communication nor is it an issue of retagging permissibility due to teh literally 24 hours that have passed since TCE joined AoI. Surely you do not think that is a reasonable amount of time in which to review retagging protocols or hitlists that were generated impropmtu and only in the hands of the raid leader.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Rifty » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:32 pm
Nephmir wrote:NoblePhnx wrote:So THAT was the plan! Neph who was the most successful disciple of yours after UniPro?
I had not finished teaching you and Festavo yet! So many areas of combat I had not shown you. Like how to calculate the precise amount of updates until password protection of a region, or how to use stealth switching attrition runs, "minutemen reinforcements", "Double-Edged Sleepers", and the like! Glorious tactics I have not had enough manpower to use yet! UP went mostly inactive unfortunately but he knows some of it already.
I am glad that you have joined AoI and made it your own though. I'd say that's pretty successful given the influence AoI has on the world.
I like to give TEK's officers the basics and a broad overview of GP and let them come to their own conclusions and self-teach. That's how I learned, after all. Some of them decide that I'm right, and that GP needs to change drastically and remain loyal to TEK, others wander off, saying they'll return but get drawn in to some other ideology.
In other words, AoI wouldn't be AoI without you, so I'd say that's a pretty successful move on your part.
by Nephmir » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:33 pm
Rifty wrote:Nephmir wrote:I had not finished teaching you and Festavo yet! So many areas of combat I had not shown you. Like how to calculate the precise amount of updates until password protection of a region, or how to use stealth switching attrition runs, "minutemen reinforcements", "Double-Edged Sleepers", and the like! Glorious tactics I have not had enough manpower to use yet! UP went mostly inactive unfortunately but he knows some of it already.
I am glad that you have joined AoI and made it your own though. I'd say that's pretty successful given the influence AoI has on the world.
I like to give TEK's officers the basics and a broad overview of GP and let them come to their own conclusions and self-teach. That's how I learned, after all. Some of them decide that I'm right, and that GP needs to change drastically and remain loyal to TEK, others wander off, saying they'll return but get drawn in to some other ideology.
In other words, AoI wouldn't be AoI without you, so I'd say that's a pretty successful move on your part.
GP References
Military Gameplay
Login Script
Manual Recruitment
The 300 Endorsements of Nephmir
"100 by land, 100 by air, 100 by sea."
Mercenary of The Sable Order
Commander in Project Soul
by Rifty » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:34 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:NoblePhnx wrote:Yeah f8ck the treaty its causing unnecessary reasons for issues it was just a treaty signifying relations it got all blown out to hell along with some strange fear of Rift planning to push a merger that would NEVER happen or even be on the table that everyone involved knows full and well.
Shad who joined AoI yesterday got the sheet from Trick now Trick says he told Shad not to hit the same targets well that's between the two of them who until yesterday might I remind you were both TCE so that does not fall on us. It's not a lack of communication nor is it an issue of retagging permissibility due to teh literally 24 hours that have passed since TCE joined AoI. Surely you do not think that is a reasonable amount of time in which to review retagging protocols or hitlists that were generated impropmtu and only in the hands of the raid leader.
For those mad at how this escalated, let's look back. We politely expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of communication, and instead of anything resembling "Sorry, won't happen again" and/or "Well little late now, but hey, mind if we tag your tags?" We got curses, excuses and fingers pointed at subordinates (and, whether or not they are to blame, that's just unprofessional).
Hm. While I'm happy to see the professional response this began with, I do think that you've taken Val's paranoia and my joking remark (in response to to the constant complaints by TCE council members in that particular chat about how the ...erm, "jerks"....at AoI had refused another olive branch of peace, and the transition very quickly from complaining about you and asking us for help, to merging with you) (also, if you'd been in that chat for over a month now, you'd know it's basically a no-holds barred shit-talk room by this point, and I'm actually kinda pissed that someone took something said there and passed it on, because we'd all considered it off the record- if I felt like it, I could trash a few people with remarks from that chat, but I won't because I've got a bit more respect then that) a little too strongly. We spent a few hours today discussing your proposal, and drafting a response, in a private chat with just the Domini. But it seems you don't even want to hear it now.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:38 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:42 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:45 pm
NoblePhnx wrote:My response was not hostile you made a big deal about some bloody tags and brought it here instead of TG or RMB. Tags that I might remind you I respect a great deal having my name on many of them and having been a Sicarian for as long as I have.
Again quote my hostile words. I responded quite civilly and said we would work to ensure it doesn't happen and tried to explain why it did.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Rifty » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:46 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:To add to that, before I've seen whatever you might have replied to it with, this whole thing has been blown up way too far by what I see as a major overreaction on AoI's part. We were half joking initially, and really just wanted y'all to actually ask, instead of just assuming and taking. We then moved to defending ourselves from Noble after a very hostile (official?) response.
And after seeing your response: If you're going to be this way. Guess ya' had to turn on us too eventually, huh? Maybe we should give it a month, that seemed to work for TCE.
I don't know about the rest of NS, but I consider the word of the AoI second in command and Military Leader, speaking on a military matter, who has access to the founder, to be basically the word of the region.
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:NoblePhnx wrote:My response was not hostile you made a big deal about some bloody tags and brought it here instead of TG or RMB. Tags that I might remind you I respect a great deal having my name on many of them and having been a Sicarian for as long as I have.
Again quote my hostile words. I responded quite civilly and said we would work to ensure it doesn't happen and tried to explain why it did.
I did not make a big deal, I made a small note of protest.
Quite civilly? Your first word was literally "F8ck." Yeah, sure, a few effing pages later maybe. But not to start.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:51 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Rifty » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:52 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:It was polite compared to what TCE tended to refer to you as, mate.
by The Sapientia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:56 pm
Rifty wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:To add to that, before I've seen whatever you might have replied to it with, this whole thing has been blown up way too far by what I see as a major overreaction on AoI's part. We were half joking initially, and really just wanted y'all to actually ask, instead of just assuming and taking. We then moved to defending ourselves from Noble after a very hostile (official?) response.
And after seeing your response: If you're going to be this way. Guess ya' had to turn on us too eventually, huh? Maybe we should give it a month, that seemed to work for TCE.
I don't know about the rest of NS, but I consider the word of the AoI second in command and Military Leader, speaking on a military matter, who has access to the founder, to be basically the word of the region.
There is no such thing as an overreaction to these comments - Joke with me on matters that are Joke worthy; Not me or my region. You may have wanted it to be taken as a joke originally but both Noble and Myself have not taken it this way.
This isn't turning on you at all - I still like the region of Sicarius. What we had two days ago was as far as I am concerned was an unofficial treaty between us that we gave the other region priority and full support. All i went about doing is putting what already was occurring down on paper. After noting the distaste for the agreement on paper which had nothing different to what we already had just not officially I think it would be wrong to return to the unofficial version of this. Noble may have hurt his reputation with you guys but your region has done a number on my view of sicarius - From a strong region with a loyal crew of members to the AoI/Sic relationship to something more of a Bruised ego region with members just trying to further their own power even if that means damaging AoI.
Well let this be a landmark - Noble speaks for the entire region when im offline; When i get on all comments are erased. Even within our region he deals with the military being run alone; Even alliances which benefit the military are organised by myself.Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:
I did not make a big deal, I made a small note of protest.
Quite civilly? Your first word was literally "F8ck." Yeah, sure, a few effing pages later maybe. But not to start.
You refereed to AoI as "effers" - Get off the high horse.
by Rifty » Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:00 pm
The Sapientia wrote:Rifty wrote:There is no such thing as an overreaction to these comments - Joke with me on matters that are Joke worthy; Not me or my region. You may have wanted it to be taken as a joke originally but both Noble and Myself have not taken it this way.
This isn't turning on you at all - I still like the region of Sicarius. What we had two days ago was as far as I am concerned was an unofficial treaty between us that we gave the other region priority and full support. All i went about doing is putting what already was occurring down on paper. After noting the distaste for the agreement on paper which had nothing different to what we already had just not officially I think it would be wrong to return to the unofficial version of this. Noble may have hurt his reputation with you guys but your region has done a number on my view of sicarius - From a strong region with a loyal crew of members to the AoI/Sic relationship to something more of a Bruised ego region with members just trying to further their own power even if that means damaging AoI.
Well let this be a landmark - Noble speaks for the entire region when im offline; When i get on all comments are erased. Even within our region he deals with the military being run alone; Even alliances which benefit the military are organised by myself.
You refereed to AoI as "effers" - Get off the high horse.
To start, you took our tags. You didn't have to jump, you didn't have to change the WFE. But yet you did.
You took our allies and simply merged with them without regards for anyone else. This is hardly the most friendly thing to do.
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:21 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:NoblePhnx wrote:My response was not hostile you made a big deal about some bloody tags and brought it here instead of TG or RMB. Tags that I might remind you I respect a great deal having my name on many of them and having been a Sicarian for as long as I have.
Again quote my hostile words. I responded quite civilly and said we would work to ensure it doesn't happen and tried to explain why it did.
I did not make a big deal, I made a small note of protest.
Quite civilly? Your first word was literally "F8ck." Yeah, sure, a few effing pages later maybe. But not to start.
NoblePhnx wrote:Yeah f8ck the treaty its causing unnecessary reasons for issues it was just a treaty signifying relations it got all blown out to hell along with some strange fear of Rift planning to push a merger that would NEVER happen or even be on the table that everyone involved knows full and well.
by AOI Administration » Sat Nov 29, 2014 9:55 pm
by Chester Pearson » Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:13 am
AOI Administration wrote:
48 WA nations in the military and 109 WA nations all up - Not bad for a region of only a few months old?
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Rifty » Sun Nov 30, 2014 1:21 am
Chester Pearson wrote:AOI Administration wrote:
48 WA nations in the military and 109 WA nations all up - Not bad for a region of only a few months old?
Your the next 10000 Islands. Congratulations. Now you can crush proposals on a whim.....
by Valrifell » Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:03 am
by Rifty » Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:40 am
Valrifell wrote:I'm fairly sure I apologized for my remarks and actions earlier in the thread.
Do I overthink a lot of thinks? Sure as hell
Do I let emotions (mainly anger) overwhelm me? Sometimes.
Do I regard myself as a person with an inflated ego? Nah.
Do I get paranoid when I think the region that me and others have spent building is threatened? Yeah, who wouldn't?
I'm a person, not a machine. I make promises, think about them, and back out. I act in the spur of the moment, rethink my choices and options and choose differently. Such was the case here. Now, I'm not pointing the finger at anyone else, this whole ordeal was almost single-handedly caused by myself. That is not to say some things couldn't have been done better on AoI's side as well. No intentional harm was supposed to come to either reputation of the region, but that seems to have happened due to the poor handling of the situation by myself.
Now that I have taken my (arguably lopsided) part of the blame, can we please grow up, remember this is a game we shouldn't be getting stressed over, and move on with our lives?
[2:14:09 AM] Prophet Rifty: In the grand scheme now...Sicarius isn't needed
[2:14:14 AM] Prophet Rifty: but i didn't come to you for power
[2:14:14 AM] EW Souls - Sicarius: THat exactly With an update force, you no longer need our updaters in return for your pilers
[2:14:33 AM] Prophet Rifty: I came since you were there from the start
by Estenia » Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:43 am
by Rifty » Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:49 am
Estenia wrote:Hey, can I move nation to the region?
by Estenia » Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:50 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement