Trick Shot wrote:Five or six of those regions were just tagged by Sicarius 2 days ago...
Sheesh you guys post a lot. Yeah Trick Shot we know you can stop reminding us now
Advertisement
by Riotopia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:00 pm
Trick Shot wrote:Five or six of those regions were just tagged by Sicarius 2 days ago...
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:01 pm
Great Kleomentia wrote:And people call raiders uncivilized
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Great Kleomentia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:02 pm
NoblePhnx wrote:NoblePhnx wrote:Yeah f8ck the treaty
Treaty wasn't my idea not to mention its intent was turned totally on its head, to be honest I don't think there is a need for it but Rift operates differently and foreign affairs are his domain and since he has been successful at gaining alliances and gaining commonwealth members I went along with his initiative.
by Blood Wine » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:03 pm
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:05 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Great Kleomentia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:05 pm
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:06 pm
Great Kleomentia wrote:NoblePhnx wrote:
Treaty wasn't my idea not to mention its intent was turned totally on its head, to be honest I don't think there is a need for it but Rift operates differently and foreign affairs are his domain and since he has been successful at gaining alliances and gaining commonwealth members I went along with his initiative.
Regardless. You're acting out while talking to potential allies about a metaphorical slap that your army gave them. That's very bad form.
by Blood Wine » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:07 pm
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:08 pm
by Great Kleomentia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:11 pm
NoblePhnx wrote:Great Kleomentia wrote:Regardless. You're acting out while talking to potential allies about a metaphorical slap that your army gave them. That's very bad form.
Which potential allies are we talking about? Sicarius is not a potential ally if we aren't already allies if nothing else than under Unity considering all the work we have done together then I have some serious misunderstandings.
NoblePhnx wrote:Like I said the metaphorical slap of tagging Sicarius embassies was something not in our control and executed by the raid leader who had the same sheet as TrickShot. Its intent that matters right? Was it our intent to willfully retag Sicarius tags NO Shad had that control and we will take it up with him and make sure it doesn't happen again.
by Great Kleomentia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:12 pm
NoblePhnx wrote:@Souls how could we ask permission to retag them when Shad put the raid together an hours before update and did not share the source or list of targets when he has been a member of AoI for less than 24 hours?
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:13 pm
NoblePhnx wrote:Which potential allies are we talking about? Sicarius is not a potential ally if we aren't already allies if nothing else than under Unity considering all the work we have done together then I have some serious misunderstandings.
Like I said the metaphorical slap of tagging Sicarius embassies was something not in our control and executed by the raid leader who had the same sheet as TrickShot. Its intent that matters right? Was it our intent to willfully retag Sicarius tags NO Shad had that control and we will take it up with him and make sure it doesn't happen again.
I'm part of Sicarius as well have been for a long time and have my name on a good deal of Sic tags I respect them as much as any Sicarian.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Riotopia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:13 pm
Great Kleomentia wrote:When TCE was officially formed and i lead a raid less than 24 hours after it's founding i asked Halcones to retag the two TBR tagged regions we raided. It's really not that hard to send a message, be it via TG or skype.
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:14 pm
by Great Kleomentia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:14 pm
Riotopia wrote:Great Kleomentia wrote:When TCE was officially formed and i lead a raid less than 24 hours after it's founding i asked Halcones to retag the two TBR tagged regions we raided. It's really not that hard to send a message, be it via TG or skype.
Speaking of which we retagged a TBR region as well as far as I remember, no one going to speak about that?
by Riotopia » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:16 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Not under your control? Are you saying there's no discipline in the AOI military, no responsibility of the general fro the actions of those beneath him? Mistake or not, as AOI military leader, it's actions are ultimately YOUR responsibility. Even if you had no part in it, it's your JOB to be civil, and do damage control, rather than start more fires. ANd no, Noble, intent is NOT what matters, actions are. If I intend to safely set off a firecracker safely, and burn down a house by accident, I'm still accountable for burning down the house. And that next line there is something that would have been good to start on. Sorry, won't happen again, game over. But we've grown from there now, haven't we?
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:16 pm
NoblePhnx wrote:@Souls how could we ask permission to retag them when Shad put the raid together an hours before update and did not share the source or list of targets when he has been a member of AoI for less than 24 hours?
Like I said it won't happen in the future but what did transpire was out of the ordinary and completely spur of the moment.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Blood Wine » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:17 pm
Elke and Elba wrote:Well Mall, you want Haven? I'd want your Joint Systems Alliance badge, then.
Discoveria wrote:Port blood is a raider through and through. Honest.
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Salt Mines will be fueled for months by the tears of silly fascists.
[4:27 PM] Antigone: Port Blood = Gameplay JesusSedgistan wrote:Attempted threadjack on sandwiches and satanism removed.
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:17 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:NoblePhnx wrote:Which potential allies are we talking about? Sicarius is not a potential ally if we aren't already allies if nothing else than under Unity considering all the work we have done together then I have some serious misunderstandings.
Like I said the metaphorical slap of tagging Sicarius embassies was something not in our control and executed by the raid leader who had the same sheet as TrickShot. Its intent that matters right? Was it our intent to willfully retag Sicarius tags NO Shad had that control and we will take it up with him and make sure it doesn't happen again.
I'm part of Sicarius as well have been for a long time and have my name on a good deal of Sic tags I respect them as much as any Sicarian.
Not under your control? Are you saying there's no discipline in the AOI military, no responsibility of the general fro the actions of those beneath him? Mistake or not, as AOI military leader, it's actions are ultimately YOUR responsibility. Even if you had no part in it, it's your JOB to be civil, and do damage control, rather than start more fires. ANd no, Noble, intent is NOT what matters, actions are. If I intend to safely set off a firecracker safely, and burn down a house by accident, I'm still accountable for burning down the house. And that next line there is something that would have been good to start on. Sorry, won't happen again, game over. But we've grown from there now, haven't we?
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:17 pm
Riotopia wrote:
Your logic is pretty flawed. What you're saying is that if a man spills his drink on you by accident you would punch him just like you would punch someone that intentionally spilled their drink on you.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:19 pm
Blood Wine wrote:Heres an idea:
team A comes in,tags region including a link to raid report,team B retags and leaves a mention on the bottom
team A tag <date>
<forum link>
by NoblePhnx » Sat Nov 29, 2014 2:20 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Riotopia wrote:
Your logic is pretty flawed. What you're saying is that if a man spills his drink on you by accident you would punch him just like you would punch someone that intentionally spilled their drink on you.
What I'm saying is that an allied military just attacked our territory, and instead of saying sorry, they've gone on to defend their action as within their right.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Burgerslandia, The Phantom Gambler
Advertisement