Unibot III wrote:-snip-
Anyway that's kind of an example of the venom / bad blood I'm talking about. How can positive change be made with all that toxicity (both on and off site)?
Also some of the links in your signature are broken.
Advertisement
by Todd McCloud » Thu Feb 11, 2016 6:15 am
Unibot III wrote:-snip-
by Kringalia » Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:49 am
by Todd McCloud » Thu Feb 11, 2016 8:32 am
Kringalia wrote:Out of historical curiosity, what would you say comprises the MATT-DUCK era and what would you say was the disruptive event that separated the Bellz era from the Fudgie era?
by Kringalia » Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:16 am
by Pierconium » Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:21 am
Kringalia wrote:Why call it THE MATT-DUCK era though? Wasn't LadyRebels a more prominent figure, and long serving delegate, during that period?
by Belschaft » Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:23 am
by Kringalia » Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:27 am
Pierconium wrote:MATT-DUCK was a well-liked member of the community that unfortunately had a tragic RL accident that removed him from the game. LadyRebels was initially part of the ACC and an invading force. She gained the respect of her peers and the nations in TSP over a period of time, but the memory of why she was in control lingered. M-D took over for her on a couple of occasions while she was away from the game and was more hands-on than LR in governing the region.
Belschaft wrote:Eh, I think Todd was just looking for convenient names to attach to the various time periods. What he called the "Hillvile" period (late 2011-early 2014) wasn't dominated by Hileville, he was just one of several prominent players who were at the centre of government for it, and the same is true for the other periods.
by Solorni » Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:31 am
by Glen-Rhodes » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:01 am
by Pierconium » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:10 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:This isn't a work place. None of you are my customers. This is an online game, where there are vicious personal feuds.
There are players who find me a acerbic. There are players who are my friends and don't really have a problem with what I post. The same is true for everybody else. I don't really appreciate that I'm being held to some super high standard, and if I don't meet it, it must be because I have zero social skills.
Maybe people just don't get along.
It's not like the majority of people who post in this forum are the epitome of politeness and timidity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Ambroscus Koth » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:17 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:This isn't a work place. None of you are my customers. This is an online game, where there are vicious personal feuds.
There are players who find me a acerbic. There are players who are my friends and don't really have a problem with what I post. The same is true for everybody else. I don't really appreciate that I'm being held to some super high standard, and if I don't meet it, it must be because I have zero social skills.
Maybe people just don't get along.
It's not like the majority of people who post in this forum are the epitome of politeness and timidity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Pierconium » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:23 am
Ambroscus Koth wrote:Glen-Rhodes wrote:This isn't a work place. None of you are my customers. This is an online game, where there are vicious personal feuds.
There are players who find me a acerbic. There are players who are my friends and don't really have a problem with what I post. The same is true for everybody else. I don't really appreciate that I'm being held to some super high standard, and if I don't meet it, it must be because I have zero social skills.
Maybe people just don't get along.
It's not like the majority of people who post in this forum are the epitome of politeness and timidity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol I'd be straight up lynched if I acted like this in my capacity as OFO root, and I wouldn't tolerate this kind of inflated self-importance from any of my team. Sure, this is a game and not a workplace. But you're supposed to be a part of the foundation and infrastructure of a healthy community, game or not.
by Ambroscus Koth » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:34 am
by Pierconium » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:38 am
Ambroscus Koth wrote:He refuses to separate his realpolitik from his admin position, that's the problem Ivan. Administration should not be a political weapon, and Glen-Rhodes refuses to give up any little bit of the stranglehold he has.
by Icecream Princess » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:40 am
Ambroscus Koth wrote:Glen-Rhodes wrote:This isn't a work place. None of you are my customers. This is an online game, where there are vicious personal feuds.
There are players who find me a acerbic. There are players who are my friends and don't really have a problem with what I post. The same is true for everybody else. I don't really appreciate that I'm being held to some super high standard, and if I don't meet it, it must be because I have zero social skills.
Maybe people just don't get along.
It's not like the majority of people who post in this forum are the epitome of politeness and timidity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol I'd be straight up lynched if I acted like this in my capacity as OFO root, and I wouldn't tolerate this kind of inflated self-importance from any of my team. Sure, this is a game and not a workplace. But you're supposed to be a part of the foundation and infrastructure of a healthy community, game or not.
by Unibot III » Thu Feb 11, 2016 11:52 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Icecream Princess » Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:02 pm
by Unibot III » Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:09 pm
Icecream Princess wrote:When I was thinking of other NS leaders who struggled with PR, I was thinking of you as the prime example of this. It's no wonder you and Glen get along so well xD
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Ambroscus Koth » Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:12 pm
Unibot III wrote:Icecream Princess wrote:When I was thinking of other NS leaders who struggled with PR, I was thinking of you as the prime example of this. It's no wonder you and Glen get along so well xD
I have the energy to write treatises and work on something for ages but even I have limits. Being nice to some players was exhausting.
by Unibot III » Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:32 pm
Eluvatar wrote:Courtesy is not dishonesty.
Ambroscus Koth wrote:Unibot III wrote:
I have the energy to write treatises and work on something for ages but even I have limits. Being nice to some players was exhausting.
Good thing you had such a great handle on who you were nice to in this game then, right?
Anyway, as long as we're talking about inflated senses of self-importance, I'd prefer to keep the discussion in this thread related to the ones that are relevant to TSP.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Cormac Stark » Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:57 pm
Unibot III wrote:No wonder the other side wants the law to be followed - it's the only thing standing between them and getting thrown out on their asses into the cold.
by Unibot III » Thu Feb 11, 2016 2:26 pm
Cormac Stark wrote:Unibot III wrote:No wonder the other side wants the law to be followed - it's the only thing standing between them and getting thrown out on their asses into the cold.
And you are the only one who thinks this would have a positive outcome, because you want to wrest control of the South Pacific to pursue your foreign, defender agenda
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Cormac Stark » Thu Feb 11, 2016 2:46 pm
Unibot III wrote:There's two stories here. The first is that I'm an evil entryist whose presence would mark the end of TSP's military neutrality if Belschaft and co.'s valiant efforts to break as many laws as possible weren't successful in removing me, the Caped Crusader and my tight-clad sidekick (sorry Glen, you're the sidekick rarrrrh!).
The other is that Glen-Rhodes and I just had different opinions on things than Belschaft and co. and, seeing us a threat to their power and control over the South Pacific, this necessitated a grave and criminal retaliation justified under the former cock and bull story. Since you'll never get inside my head, I guess you'll never know which one is true for certain.
Advertisement
Advertisement