Advertisement
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Aug 10, 2014 1:16 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Karpathos » Tue Aug 12, 2014 7:20 pm
by Salaxalans Mafia Man » Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:34 pm
by Venico » Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:05 am
Salaxalans Mafia Man wrote:Karpathos! Why the hell aren't you in the game yet?
As for Venico, he was an evil Mafia member and shot everyone before they could hang him. So I guess Venico wins!
by Salaxalans Mafia Man » Sat Aug 16, 2014 8:49 pm
by Dawsinian » Mon Jan 19, 2015 1:32 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Jan 19, 2015 3:45 pm
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Benjamin Henrikson » Mon Jan 19, 2015 3:49 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:But will there be more Mafia?
by Tim-Opolis » Sat Dec 19, 2015 8:13 pm
by Cormac Stark » Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:29 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:Of course, NS is a very diverse game, offering a multitude of ways how to play it. It is perfectly normal that one way that's resonable and fun to one player, will at the same time bore, mystify, or even annoy the other. Let them. It's part of the game. But what's not to be part of the game is destroying other people's regions just because you can - only to then have the temerity to claim 'that's what makes the game interesting for them'. No, it is not, it's what makes them lose interest in the game.
by Tim-Opolis » Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:44 pm
Cormac Stark wrote:Tim-Opolis wrote:Of course, NS is a very diverse game, offering a multitude of ways how to play it. It is perfectly normal that one way that's resonable and fun to one player, will at the same time bore, mystify, or even annoy the other. Let them. It's part of the game. But what's not to be part of the game is destroying other people's regions just because you can - only to then have the temerity to claim 'that's what makes the game interesting for them'. No, it is not, it's what makes them lose interest in the game.
It's unfortunate to see a defender region that was once light on ideological extremism and friendly and welcoming toward raiders so thoroughly embracing moralism, especially under Rogamark, who was previously one of Spiritus' more moderate and independently minded citizens. I guess it really isn't possible to actively defend for fun and activity, you have to have a moral superiority complex. What a shame.
Nonetheless, congratulations to the SDF on its recent growth and successes.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Cormac Stark » Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:53 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:*cough* "Rogamark's Remarks (or Words from the High Elder under our Brotherhood of Steel theme) are my personal comments, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Spiritan Government or Cabinet, nor are they my official presidential or ministerial opinions." *cough*
by The Silver Sentinel » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:25 am
Cormac Stark wrote:I guess it really isn't possible to actively defend for fun and activity, you have to have a moral superiority complex. What a shame.
by Tim-Opolis » Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:26 am
Cormac Stark wrote:Tim-Opolis wrote:*cough* "Rogamark's Remarks (or Words from the High Elder under our Brotherhood of Steel theme) are my personal comments, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Spiritan Government or Cabinet, nor are they my official presidential or ministerial opinions." *cough*
Yeah, that reminds me of when Unibot was somehow never representative of the UDL when he was being extreme and ridiculous. Rogamark is using the title of his regional office in the article's title and the article is in the regional foreign update, which is being delivered to Spiritus' embassy regions, including regions that regularly raid.
Fun fact: Even Unibot never claimed not to be representing the UDL in his Letters from the Chief of the Band.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Trickster of Seville » Mon Dec 21, 2015 6:03 am
Tim-Opolis wrote:Cormac Stark wrote:Yeah, that reminds me of when Unibot was somehow never representative of the UDL when he was being extreme and ridiculous. Rogamark is using the title of his regional office in the article's title and the article is in the regional foreign update, which is being delivered to Spiritus' embassy regions, including regions that regularly raid.
Fun fact: Even Unibot never claimed not to be representing the UDL in his Letters from the Chief of the Band.
I feel like we both know that regardless of the Defender direction that Spiritus has, we're no UDL, and Rogamark certainly is no Unibot
The Spiritus Administration has many individuals of many different thoughts and affiliations within it, and I think we balance each other out quite well, or at least well enough to ensure that Spiritus doesn't suddenly go full Unibotian in its Defender ideologies.
by Blitze » Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:39 pm
by SouthMac » Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:53 pm
Blitze wrote:If the situation is not resolved with due haste, the government of Spiritus will rule that The South Pacific has abrogated its responsibilities under the aforementioned Lampshade Accords.
by Rogamark III » Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:14 pm
SouthMac wrote:What precisely does this mean -- that you will consider the treaty nullified, or work to restore the Coalition? That's very unclear from this language.
by SouthMac » Sun Jan 31, 2016 6:22 pm
Rogamark III wrote:I'm sure you'll understand some questions are still debated internally in Spiritus, but the thing is: The Lampshade Accords expressly recognize "the Coalition of TSP" as the legitimate government of TSP and also as our treaty partner. So there are several possible interpretations as to what our rights and responsibilities under the treaty may be. And regardless of whether one prefers the Coalition or the transitional government, Spiritus doesn't care much for the choice of action that was taken here. We do not consider extralegal seizure of power a legitimate move, even if it might have been well-intentioned.
by Wuufu » Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:19 am
by Blitze » Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:26 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement