Page 36 of 237

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:44 pm
by Unibot III
Ananke II wrote:Nice interview, Benevolent Thomas and Unibot. :)


It was a fun interview to do, thanks! :)

For those looking for Issue XVII, it's Here.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:52 pm
by Unibot III
BREAKING NEWS EXTRA:

Hileville accuses Belschaft of Fraud and Defamation
Meanwhile Escade asks CSS to review Belschaft’s behavior…
COMMENTARY | UNIBOT

Image
Hileville goes to Court...

Hileville has brought forth a case to The South Pacific’s High Court against Belschaft on the grounds of Fraud and Defamation.

On Friday March 21, Belschaft sent a telegram to the citizens of The South Pacific, suggesting that a “coup” had occurred and that the root admin, Hileville, had gone rogue and that Hileville had established a dictatorship in The South Pacific. Belschaft had argued Hileville had done so because he had not gotten his way in regards to an “internal admin matter”, but what he neglected to inform readers was that this internal admin matter was the decision on whether or not to uphold Belschaft’s removal from the Admin Staff.

The case will be based on the fact that no “coup” had occurred (the coalition was still in place) and that the administration shake-up had occurred a month after the shake-up had been announced (in which no admin except Drugged Monkeys had replied).

“This telegram contained lies,” says Hileville to the High Court. “It is my belief that this was done to put a negative light on me for his own gain”.

Hileville’s case hinges on the argument that since Belschaft had been removed from the administration staff for abusive posting and harassment of a player, Belschaft had an interest in pursuing the defamation of Hileville’s character in the hopes of generating the need for a switch of forums where he stood a chance of becoming an administrator once more. Hileville is seeking counsel to represent his case.

Meanwhile, last night, Escade posed a need for review of Belschaft’s behavior to the Committee of State Security where Belschaft remains a voting, senior member. While the review has since been moved to a private forum, Escade argued that Belschaft’s recent telegram to the region, plus his history of harassment, made him inappropriate for membership in the Committee of State Security. It remains to be seen whether or not the Committee of State Security will agree, but nonetheless, these pose startling new developments from The South Pacific.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:35 pm
by Improving Wordiness
Mallorea and Riva wrote:DEN exists it's just hibernating right now. But its connection to CP is incredibly dated, DEN forces participated in TBH-led invasion awhile back. For 10KI to reach back to that is a stretch.


Oh come on Mal :P We all know you guys have double sided flags. Who you represent very much depends on what way the wind is blowing.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:41 pm
by Mallorea and Riva
Improving Wordiness wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:DEN exists it's just hibernating right now. But its connection to CP is incredibly dated, DEN forces participated in TBH-led invasion awhile back. For 10KI to reach back to that is a stretch.


Oh come on Mal :P We all know you guys have double sided flags. Who you represent very much depends on what way the wind is blowing.

Who I represent is pretty clearly outlined in my sig :p

On that note if Bel is requiring legal assistance I would gladly offer my services.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:40 am
by South Pacific Belschaft
Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Improving Wordiness wrote:
Oh come on Mal :P We all know you guys have double sided flags. Who you represent very much depends on what way the wind is blowing.

Who I represent is pretty clearly outlined in my sig :p

On that note if Bel is requiring legal assistance I would gladly offer my services.

I think I can handle it myself, but I'll let you know if I need any witnesses intimidating :p

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:10 am
by Mallorea and Riva
South Pacific Belschaft wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Who I represent is pretty clearly outlined in my sig :p

On that note if Bel is requiring legal assistance I would gladly offer my services.

I think I can handle it myself, but I'll let you know if I need any witnesses intimidating :p

Let them know that if they convict you I will sign up for citizenship again and give them the same treatment I've given TNP over the years.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:04 am
by McMasterdonia
Mallorea and Riva wrote:
South Pacific Belschaft wrote:I think I can handle it myself, but I'll let you know if I need any witnesses intimidating :p

Let them know that if they convict you I will sign up for citizenship again and give them the same treatment I've given TNP over the years.


If you mean holding citizenship until your nation cte's and then returning a couple of months later.... oh my word Mall, what will TSP do with that situation on their hands? Troubling.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:15 am
by Mallorea and Riva
McMasterdonia wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Let them know that if they convict you I will sign up for citizenship again and give them the same treatment I've given TNP over the years.


If you mean holding citizenship until your nation cte's and then returning a couple of months later.... oh my word Mall, what will TSP do with that situation on their hands? Troubling.

You'll rue the day you crossed me Mcmaster. Better delegates than you have tried to contain my annoyances in TNP and failed.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:22 am
by McMasterdonia
Mallorea and Riva wrote:
McMasterdonia wrote:
If you mean holding citizenship until your nation cte's and then returning a couple of months later.... oh my word Mall, what will TSP do with that situation on their hands? Troubling.

You'll rue the day you crossed me Mcmaster. Better delegates than you have tried to contain my annoyances in TNP and failed.

:rofl:

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:03 am
by Anumia
Pretty sure McMasterdonia knows how to deal with sharks ;)

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:19 am
by Solorni
The title makes it seem like Hile is the one being charged :P

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:22 am
by Anumia
Solorni wrote:The title makes it seem like Hile is the one being charged :P


I thought so too.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:54 pm
by RiderSyl
Anumia wrote:
Solorni wrote:The title makes it seem like Hile is the one being charged :P


I thought so too.


Same here. :meh:

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:25 pm
by Tyler Kazakov IV
Ridersyl wrote:
Anumia wrote:
I thought so too.


Same here. :meh:


That.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:40 pm
by Auralia
Unibot, you should write an article about the GAR #2 mess in the GA.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:07 pm
by The Rejected Times
Auralia wrote:Unibot, you should write an article about the GAR #2 mess in the GA.


The staff is already aware of the story, thanks. ;)

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 5:20 pm
by Lemongrad Union
The Rejected Realms Media Corporation wrote:Lemongrab Union

who dat

Officers Canned in The Rejected Realms!

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:34 pm
by The Rejected Times
Thread closed

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:36 pm
by Mallorea and Riva
The Italian Stallion is out of control.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:40 pm
by Christian Democrats
Boo! Why am I not included in the story?

:p

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:53 pm
by PrussianEmpire
Christian Democrats wrote:Boo! Why am I not included in the story?

:p

Whow! CD posting in GP D:!

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:57 pm
by The Rejected Times
Thread closed

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:34 pm
by Solorni
[ It was heralded as another great success by JAL, r3naissanc3r and Kiwi, while other members like Rachel, Lord Ravenclaw and Abacathea were critical of the dissenters – questioning their patriotism and commitment to the region.

My posts:

"Isn't raiding evil and one of NS' seven deadly sins?"
"I think we should condemn Blue Wolf II. It's becoming increasingly likely he's a raider xD"

Clearly comedic. So, I'm not sure where I was critical of the dissenters and questioned their patriotism and commitment to TNP. I'd like this libel removed please.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:39 pm
by Unibot III
Solorni wrote:
[ It was heralded as another great success by JAL, r3naissanc3r and Kiwi, while other members like Rachel, Lord Ravenclaw and Abacathea were critical of the dissenters – questioning their patriotism and commitment to the region.

My posts:

"Isn't raiding evil and one of NS' seven deadly sins?"
"I think we should condemn Blue Wolf II. It's becoming increasingly likely he's a raider xD"

Clearly comedic. So, I'm not sure where I was critical of the dissenters and questioned their patriotism and commitment to TNP. I'd like this libel removed please.


"Questioning their patriotism and commitment" is in the sub-clause. The only thing directly attributed to you was that you were critical of the dissenters. I believe your quotations were mocking their responses.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:49 pm
by Solorni
Unibot III wrote:
Solorni wrote:My posts:

"Isn't raiding evil and one of NS' seven deadly sins?"
"I think we should condemn Blue Wolf II. It's becoming increasingly likely he's a raider xD"

Clearly comedic. So, I'm not sure where I was critical of the dissenters and questioned their patriotism and commitment to TNP. I'd like this libel removed please.


"Questioning their patriotism and commitment" is in the sub-clause. The only thing directly attributed to you was that you were critical of the dissenters. I believe your quotations were mocking their responses.

I don't believe satire is being critical. I can and have made satire about myself and things I like. Secondly, the first is a bit mocking and making fun of people who claim raiding is evil. But the second one was just pretending not to know Blue Wolf was a raider, which would lead to the hilarious scenario of thinking he might be one.

If making a couple quips for the fun of it is being critical, then I'd actually try to be critical. I'm just annoyed that I'm being name dropped in this piece because I tried to make some funny posts there (and I made similarly funny posts elsewhere on the forum). At least, I intended them to be funny... but anyhow, I'd really prefer it if you didn't name drop me.



As a whole, I enjoyed this entire news post. Just annoyed that you decided to have a random low blow in it.