NATION

PASSWORD

The Rejected Times

Talk about regional management and politics, raider/defender gameplay, and other game-related matters.
Not a roleplaying forum.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cormacville
Envoy
 
Posts: 218
Founded: Nov 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormacville » Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:52 pm

Unibot III wrote:Then SB drops a bombshell... speculation beings again over who is going to be the next MoA. I stand by my guess of Cormac v. Geomania.

I'm not running for Minister of the Army, to state this clearly for the second time now, though I hope TSP will find someone who isn't defender to run for that position. If they don't, I would obviously support Geomania over Glen-Rhodes. Hell, I'd support you over Glen-Rhodes. No offense to Glen-Rhodes but he has no military gameplay experience whatsoever.

Point of clarification: Where did SB say he isn't running for re-election? Because I'm not seeing it.
Last edited by Cormacville on Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cormac Skollvaldr
Founder of Over the Rainbow

"We are all misfits living in a world on fire." - Kelly Clarkson

User avatar
Unibot III
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7113
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Unibot III » Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:02 pm

http://forums.thesouthpacific.org/forum ... h-pacific/

Southern Bellz wrote:I will not be seeking re-election as the Minister of the Army. Nor will I be running for delegate or any other cabinet positions. The only elected position I have an interest in is Vice Delegate- so anyone who has an exciting platform for delegate, send it to me, and I will be more than willing to back the person with the most creative and engaging platform.
Last edited by Unibot III on Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25-05-2008 | Former Delegate of TRR

Factbook // Collected works // Gameplay Alignment Test //
9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Headlines from Unibot // WASC HQ: A Guide

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
Southern Bellz
Diplomat
 
Posts: 633
Founded: Oct 04, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Southern Bellz » Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:02 pm

I'm not running for re-election.

User avatar
South Pacific Belschaft
Diplomat
 
Posts: 576
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby South Pacific Belschaft » Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:07 pm

Glen-Rhodes wrote:
Unibot III wrote:Then SB drops a bombshell... speculation beings again over who is going to be the next MoA. I stand by my guess of Cormac v. Geomania.

I am actually running for MoFA and MoA, since there's no legal restriction against it. I feel that centralizing that authority is best, because MoA constantly steps on MoFA's toes and I mean we might as well save on office space.

As absurd as this idea is, it would appear to somehow actually be legal. Good thing you mentioned it now; I'll have time to move an amendment to the CoL to vote and have it pass before elections, preventing the blatant subversion of democracy you intended to attempt.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

With the cooperation of Federation Forces, all of your bases now belong to us.

User avatar
Kringalia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 819
Founded: Feb 03, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Kringalia » Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:28 pm

While the idea of someone holding two Cabinet positions doesn't excite me in the least, and I wouldn't support such a course of action, I wouldn't call it a "blatant subversion of democracy". It's not like he would stop being accountable to the electorate or anything of that sort.
Last edited by Kringalia on Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chief Justice of the South Pacific
Delegate of the South Pacific (Apr - Dec 2014)

Interviewed Max Barry | Tuesday Couper | Commended by WASC #422

User avatar
Cormacville
Envoy
 
Posts: 218
Founded: Nov 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormacville » Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:57 pm

Kringalia wrote:While the idea of someone holding two Cabinet positions doesn't excite me in the least, and I wouldn't support such a course of action, I wouldn't call it a "blatant subversion of democracy". It's not like he would stop being accountable to the electorate or anything of that sort.

The Cabinet collectively makes executive decisions. Electing anyone to two Cabinet offices would either give them two votes on the Cabinet or would deprive the Cabinet of a vote, neither of which is a desirable outcome -- and the former would in fact be "blatant subversion of democracy."

This wouldn't be the case in regions in which the Delegate makes executive decisions and the cabinet is primarily an advisory and/or ministerial body, but that isn't the system in TSP. Being elected to two Cabinet offices would be a significant problem.

@ Unibot - Thank you. I hadn't been to the Assembly forum yet today.
Last edited by Cormacville on Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cormac Skollvaldr
Founder of Over the Rainbow

"We are all misfits living in a world on fire." - Kelly Clarkson

User avatar
Unibot III
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7113
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Unibot III » Thu Mar 20, 2014 11:06 pm

Cormacville wrote:@ Unibot - Thank you. I hadn't been to the Assembly forum yet today.


No worries, Cormac.

Um as for G-R throwing his hat for MoA - I understand his complaints, the MoA's actions can easily interfere in FA, but running as MoA doesn't solve that systematic problem. We can't just always have the MoA and MoFA be shared positions. Moreover, I'm not sure if G-R is qualified to MoA -- at the very least, not sure if he's more qualified than the potential other candidates. He also hasn't served in the NSA, I believe?

As to Cormac's throw-out, while I do think I could run the NSA, I haven't been a member of NSA, so I would feel uncomfortable suddenly stepping in to run the NSA from the outside. It would put people in NSA who have served for quite a while in the NSA in a weird position.

I wonder if some sort of system could be devised where the MoFA had a veto power or something on the army's activities -- in the sense that if the MoA deploys NSA against X,Y and Z and this has negative effects on a diplomatic relationship with A,B or C.. the MoFA can veto the mission and send out what diplomatic communiques he needs to send out.

That's a rough system which probably gives the MoFA too much power -- but I do think Glen is right that the MoA can easily step on his toes by invading somewhere or defending something that upsets an ally or someone we're in negotiations with.
Last edited by Unibot III on Thu Mar 20, 2014 11:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25-05-2008 | Former Delegate of TRR

Factbook // Collected works // Gameplay Alignment Test //
9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Headlines from Unibot // WASC HQ: A Guide

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
The Rejected Times
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Apr 07, 2023
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rejected Times » Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:07 am

Thread closed
Last edited by The Rejected Realms Media Corporation on Fri Apr 07, 2023 2:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
South Pacific Belschaft
Diplomat
 
Posts: 576
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby South Pacific Belschaft » Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:17 am

The Rejected Realms Media Corporation wrote:What remains to be seen is (i) why was Belschaft removed from the admin staff – we do not know yet what the other admins were discussing

It should be noted that no one on the admin team knows this either, for the relatively simple reason that Hileville has refused to provide any genuine explanation. The discussion largely consisted of the admin trying to get Hileville to do such.
Last edited by South Pacific Belschaft on Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

With the cooperation of Federation Forces, all of your bases now belong to us.

User avatar
The Dourian Embassy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1547
Founded: Nov 15, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby The Dourian Embassy » Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:33 am

This sounds like a purely internal matter. Admin decisions aren't generally subject to review. So this article seems sorta meaningless to me.

Good to know who the admins in TSP are, I guess?

As for Bel:

South Pacific Belschaft wrote:
The Rejected Realms Media Corporation wrote:What remains to be seen is (i) why was Belschaft removed from the admin staff – we do not know yet what the other admins were discussing

It should be noted that no one on the admin team knows this either, for the relatively simple reason that Hileville has refused to provide any genuine explanation. The discussion largely consisted of the admin trying to get Hileville to do such.


“HEM's last administrative action was completed on the 24th of January with a grand total of 20 actions taken dating back to July,” says Hileville, while also noting, “Southern Bellz has in the past expressed no real desire to complete the basic tasks of an admin”.


Edit: For stuffs mentioned in the next post. ;)
Last edited by The Dourian Embassy on Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
Treize Dreizehn, President of Douria.

cause ain't no such things as halfway crooks

User avatar
South Pacific Belschaft
Diplomat
 
Posts: 576
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby South Pacific Belschaft » Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:35 am

This article, and Unibot, are pro-admin purge Douria :P
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

With the cooperation of Federation Forces, all of your bases now belong to us.

User avatar
Drop Your Pants
Senator
 
Posts: 3860
Founded: Apr 17, 2005
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Drop Your Pants » Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:35 am

Who holds the root account on the TSP boards?
Happily oblivious to NS Drama and I rarely pay attention beyond 5 minutes

User avatar
South Pacific Belschaft
Diplomat
 
Posts: 576
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby South Pacific Belschaft » Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:39 am

Hileville. Hence this... issue.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

With the cooperation of Federation Forces, all of your bases now belong to us.

User avatar
Zaolat
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1426
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaolat » Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:47 am

South Pacific Belschaft wrote:Hileville. Hence this... issue.

DYP is a tl;dr type of guy. :P
Former Delegate of the Rejected Realms - TRR Forum | Pharaoh Emeritus of Osiris - OFO Forum
Guide to the Gameplay Forum | NS Discord Links | One Stop Rules Shop
Max Barry on The Legend of Zelda
<Zaolat>: maxbarry: Have you played any Legend of Zelda video game?
<maxbarry>: I have NEVER played Zelda, I know that is shocking
Victim of the Flag Thief

User avatar
Unibot III
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7113
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Unibot III » Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:58 am

South Pacific Belschaft wrote:This article, and Unibot, are pro-admin purge Douria :P


The article mentions both HEM's allegations that Hileville has de-admin'd him because of his objections to your removal and Hileville's allegations that HEM has been neglecting his duties as admin. Both seemed like important points to bring up.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25-05-2008 | Former Delegate of TRR

Factbook // Collected works // Gameplay Alignment Test //
9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Headlines from Unibot // WASC HQ: A Guide

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
South Pacific Belschaft
Diplomat
 
Posts: 576
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby South Pacific Belschaft » Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:02 am

Unibot III wrote:
South Pacific Belschaft wrote:This article, and Unibot, are pro-admin purge Douria :P


The article mentions both HEM's allegations that Hileville has de-admin'd him because of his objections to your removal and Hileville's allegations that HEM has been neglecting his duties as admin. Both seemed like important points to bring up.

It did not, however, mention the fact that indisputable evidence has been presented that shows that 1; Hileville issued a gag order, forbidding the admin team from discussing his actions 2; Prohibited a vote of the admin team in regards to these actions 3; That the admin team refused to comply with these orders 4; That the next day every single member of the admin team who did so was removed.

It's not allegations when you have evidence.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

With the cooperation of Federation Forces, all of your bases now belong to us.

User avatar
Drop Your Pants
Senator
 
Posts: 3860
Founded: Apr 17, 2005
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Drop Your Pants » Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:02 am

South Pacific Belschaft wrote:Hileville. Hence this... issue.

I don't read anything over 1 paragraph :P Not sure why you want admin though, its just an extra workload unless you treat it as a position of meaningless power.
Happily oblivious to NS Drama and I rarely pay attention beyond 5 minutes

User avatar
Unibot III
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7113
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Unibot III » Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:25 am

South Pacific Belschaft wrote:
Unibot III wrote:
The article mentions both HEM's allegations that Hileville has de-admin'd him because of his objections to your removal and Hileville's allegations that HEM has been neglecting his duties as admin. Both seemed like important points to bring up.

It did not, however, mention the fact that indisputable evidence has been presented that shows that 1; Hileville issued a gag order, forbidding the admin team from discussing his actions 2; Prohibited a vote of the admin team in regards to these actions 3; That the admin team refused to comply with these orders 4; That the next day every single member of the admin team who did so was removed.

It's not allegations when you have evidence.


This article was written before you released those PMs -- I don't think we would linked the article to the PMs however, since the authors didn't consent to their release. The article may have discussed the content of the PMs however.

There still also remains the counter-claim that the timing is coincidental (and comes after exactly one month of forewarning of a shakeup happening). Hileville's counter-argument that HEM had been neglecting his duties was worth mentioning, in my view.
Last edited by Unibot III on Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25-05-2008 | Former Delegate of TRR

Factbook // Collected works // Gameplay Alignment Test //
9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Headlines from Unibot // WASC HQ: A Guide

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
South Pacific Belschaft
Diplomat
 
Posts: 576
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby South Pacific Belschaft » Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:27 am

Unibot III wrote:
South Pacific Belschaft wrote:It did not, however, mention the fact that indisputable evidence has been presented that shows that 1; Hileville issued a gag order, forbidding the admin team from discussing his actions 2; Prohibited a vote of the admin team in regards to these actions 3; That the admin team refused to comply with these orders 4; That the next day every single member of the admin team who did so was removed.

It's not allegations when you have evidence.


This article was written before you released those PMs -- I don't think we would linked the article to the PMs however, since the authors didn't consent to their release. The article may have discussed the content of the PMs however.

The PM's were linked to in the PNN article at the time you went to press.
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

With the cooperation of Federation Forces, all of your bases now belong to us.

User avatar
Unibot III
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7113
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Unibot III » Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:32 am

South Pacific Belschaft wrote:
Unibot III wrote:
This article was written before you released those PMs -- I don't think we would linked the article to the PMs however, since the authors didn't consent to their release. The article may have discussed the content of the PMs however.

The PM's were linked to in the PNN article at the time you went to press.


Well that's your problem for sending the pics to PNN and not The Times -- we wrote our article at the same time as PNN did. However, I'm not sure whether we would have published those PMs anyways, since the authors didn't consent to their publishing.

Not much use in us asking for soundbites to be on the record if we just circulate PMs willy-nilly from them without with their consent.

EDIT: Do note this is a "breaking news" story, there will be a follow-up article in our new issue with more facts as they present themselves. You're encouraged to send information to us if and when you receive it to help us capture the most accurate picture of what is going on with this crisis.
Last edited by Unibot III on Fri Mar 21, 2014 5:36 am, edited 5 times in total.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25-05-2008 | Former Delegate of TRR

Factbook // Collected works // Gameplay Alignment Test //
9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Headlines from Unibot // WASC HQ: A Guide

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
Southern Bellz
Diplomat
 
Posts: 633
Founded: Oct 04, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Re: The Rejected Times: TSP Admin Shakeup - Coup?

Postby Southern Bellz » Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:24 am

I just want to mention to Unibot that the admins who were removed are the only reason he is not banned from TSP forums.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

User avatar
Evil Wolf
Minister
 
Posts: 2412
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Evil Wolf » Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:31 am

*Evil Wolf grabs popcorn*
It's ok! You can trust me! I've been Commended!

Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.

Mallorea and Riva should be a Game Moderator Game Administrator.

User avatar
Unibot III
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7113
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Unibot III » Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:34 am

Southern Bellz wrote:I just want to mention to Unibot that the admins who were removed are the only reason he is not banned from TSP forums.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk


I know that, SB. I didn't want to write the article in a way that would reflect by personal bias on the matter. Some of Hile's appointments were also supportive of my ban.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25-05-2008 | Former Delegate of TRR

Factbook // Collected works // Gameplay Alignment Test //
9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Headlines from Unibot // WASC HQ: A Guide

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
Venico
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1389
Founded: Mar 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Venico » Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:46 am

Being Root Admin absolutely can be frustrating if you don't have an active enough staff. If those numbers are correct there's no reason for HEM to be an admin. If he posted a thread in the technical forum and no one responded...for a month, then yeah. None of that team deserves admin. Of course he couldn't put this to a vote, he would have never gotten new admins.

"Ok so here's the motion guys, you all lose administrative powers and I get a new team who will actually do stuff. All in favor say aye?"

People are inherently greedy and protective of their position once they get admin, never understood that. I wish Hileville the best of luck in maintaining the forums for such an active region as TSP, and I also hope that people won't drag internal issues of TSP into GP in the future. As much fun as it is. =P
Priest of Raider Unity

Raider Unity, Maintain a Founder, Sign a Treaty

Malice Never Dies...

User avatar
Hileville
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: May 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Re: The Rejected Times: TSP Admin Shakeup - Coup?

Postby Hileville » Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:17 am

Venico wrote:Being Root Admin absolutely can be frustrating if you don't have an active enough staff. If those numbers are correct there's no reason for HEM to be an admin. If he posted a thread in the technical forum and no one responded...for a month, then yeah. None of that team deserves admin. Of course he couldn't put this to a vote, he would have never gotten new admins.

"Ok so here's the motion guys, you all lose administrative powers and I get a new team who will actually do stuff. All in favor say aye?"

People are inherently greedy and protective of their position once they get admin, never understood that. I wish Hileville the best of luck in maintaining the forums for such an active region as TSP, and I also hope that people won't drag internal issues of TSP into GP in the future. As much fun as it is. =P
This. EXACTLY THIS.
Hileville

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Gameplay

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Comfed, Courelli, Cretie, Esfalsa, Nlarhyalo, PhDre, Wintermoot

Advertisement

Remove ads