HumanSanity wrote:Unibot III wrote:My question would be how that would translate to a region's actual intergration policies? Kogvuron actually tried to advocate something similar to a Liberal Regionalism, but I've pushed back a little back on that - I think it sounds good, but sometimes proponents haven't fully considered how the philosophy impacts citizenship legally.
You've missed the point of my essay, which is redefining regionalism to be about player-experience instead of utility for regions. Each region can set its own policies based on their security needs, threat perceptions, and demanded loyalty. Regionalism isn't about that, it's about individual players and their outlook.
Forgive me.
I’m not sure I follow completely though, so bear with me. I think what you’re saying is that regionalism and cosmopolitanism should be viewed from a subjective, rather than objective lens — that regionalism should be limited in its scope to an individual player’s *own* value-set rather than being used to cast judgment on other players or determine regional policy?