Advertisement
by Cormactopia Prime » Thu Feb 14, 2019 9:42 pm
Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:You're a bit behind, aren't you?
Aclion wrote:Last I checked SIEGE wasn't a thing.
by The Notorious Mad Jack » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:25 pm
Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:You're a bit behind, aren't you?
by Altmoras » Fri Feb 15, 2019 1:24 am
by Qwabour Harbour » Fri Feb 15, 2019 2:09 am
by Pierconium » Fri Feb 15, 2019 3:53 am
by Aclion » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:41 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:You're a bit behind, aren't you?Aclion wrote:Last I checked SIEGE wasn't a thing.
Maybe someone should tell TSP's new Minister of Foreign Affairs.
It looks to me like Glen-Rhodes thinks SIEGE as a concept is still alive, and he made it the centerpiece of his campaign in TSP.
by Frattastan IV » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:04 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:the Rejected Realms is about to join a rival WA bloc called SIEGE
Draganisia wrote:Also it seems the next war could be NPO fighting directly against Pacifica.
by Cormactopia Prime » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:43 am
by RiderSyl » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:45 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:If SIEGE is so dead, why did Glen-Rhodes just successfully campaign for TSP's Minister of Foreign Affairs with SIEGE as the centerpiece of his campaign?
by Cormactopia Prime » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:51 am
by Pierconium » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:57 am
by Cormactopia Prime » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:01 am
by Pierconium » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:02 am
by Roavin » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:05 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:The question was more why he would campaign on a dead idea. I'm aware that TSP would still elect Glen even if he banjected a guy on Fifth Avenue.
by Cormactopia Prime » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:18 am
Pierconium wrote:Regardless, as you have yourself stated, just because it doesn't officially exist on NSGP doesn't mean it isn't a thing.
Roavin wrote:Or, how about a real shocker, it ain't a dead idea and just got pushed back/delayed/whatever'd due to benign factors, including the entire NPO situation. Scandalous!
by Unibot III » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:21 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Frattastan IV » Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:37 am
Unibot III wrote:Fratt's article was extremely well done, classic TRT stuff. It's being heralded as a rationalist perspective, but there's some very salient constructivist points too
Unibot III wrote:The note about my old "ostrich-hawk-dove" theory made me smile, it's a rough theory for sizing up an NPO Senate.
Cormactopia Prime wrote:If SIEGE is so dead, why did Glen-Rhodes just successfully campaign for TSP's Minister of Foreign Affairs with SIEGE as the centerpiece of his campaign? If SIEGE actually is dead, it looks like he lied to voters, because he's not going to accomplish a WA bloc to rival WALL without at least TEP and TRR involved.
So are we saying he did lie to voters in TSP?
Draganisia wrote:Also it seems the next war could be NPO fighting directly against Pacifica.
by Guy » Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:30 am
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Aclion wrote:There is no anyone opposed to WALL should feel obligated to refrain from setting up a rivil block. Setting up better orgs is the best way to counter it. Even the author recognise that it's not a bad idea.
Sure, but I think there should be honesty about what's happening here. The Rejected Times doesn't care about improving the World Assembly, it cares about propagandizing against WALL because the Rejected Realms is about to join a rival WA bloc called SIEGE. SIEGE won't be any better than WALL; it will push the agenda of its member regions in the World Assembly the same as WALL does for its member regions. So the article is dishonest propaganda.
Personally, given the three major regions likely to be involved in SIEGE -- The East Pacific, the Rejected Realms, and the South Pacific -- I'm rooting for WALL now more than ever before. I hope more regions will join WALL in order to counter SIEGE, if indeed the WALL regions are open to that. It would be good to see the Interregional Legislative Coalition (ILC) become a strong alternative option as well, and I hope progressive UCRs that would be a more natural fit for the ILC won't be lured into SIEGE. It would be great for example to see Forest join the ILC and advance efforts to raise environmental awareness.
[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.
by RiderSyl » Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:22 am
by Pierconium » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:51 am
by RiderSyl » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:05 am
Pierconium wrote:Umm, okay. I don’t think I ever made that statement. Please point to any post where I have stated that about any topic.
Pierconium wrote:Of course, you would know about dumb positions on Gameplay so maybe I should just defer to your wisdom on the subject?
by Cormactopia Prime » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:09 am
Guy wrote:Cormactopia Prime wrote:Sure, but I think there should be honesty about what's happening here. The Rejected Times doesn't care about improving the World Assembly, it cares about propagandizing against WALL because the Rejected Realms is about to join a rival WA bloc called SIEGE. SIEGE won't be any better than WALL; it will push the agenda of its member regions in the World Assembly the same as WALL does for its member regions. So the article is dishonest propaganda.
Personally, given the three major regions likely to be involved in SIEGE -- The East Pacific, the Rejected Realms, and the South Pacific -- I'm rooting for WALL now more than ever before. I hope more regions will join WALL in order to counter SIEGE, if indeed the WALL regions are open to that. It would be good to see the Interregional Legislative Coalition (ILC) become a strong alternative option as well, and I hope progressive UCRs that would be a more natural fit for the ILC won't be lured into SIEGE. It would be great for example to see Forest join the ILC and advance efforts to raise environmental awareness.
When people talk about Cormac having his hand on the pulse of NS and GCRs, exerting his influence anywhere and everywhere... I hope they remember this post.
by Pierconium » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:10 am
RiderSyl wrote:Pierconium wrote:Umm, okay. I don’t think I ever made that statement. Please point to any post where I have stated that about any topic.
If that isn't your position, then we can clear it up right now. Do you believe an organization can exist without being public, Pierconium?Pierconium wrote:Of course, you would know about dumb positions on Gameplay so maybe I should just defer to your wisdom on the subject?
Put a nickel in the ad hominem jar.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Hekp, Rosartemis
Advertisement