NATION

PASSWORD

The United Defenders League

Talk about regional management and politics, raider/defender gameplay, and other game-related matters.
Not a roleplaying forum.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Sedgistan
Senior Issues Moderator
 
Posts: 33757
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:46 am

It's like Apple just replaced Steve Jobs with the guy that drove his car.

Congrats anyway.This should be interesting.

User avatar
Zaolat
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1426
Founded: Aug 01, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Zaolat » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:59 am

SkyDip wrote:Bad speech, Mahaj. But good luck anyway. :hug:

That was obviously Tramiar.
Former Delegate of the Rejected Realms - TRR Forum | Pharaoh Emeritus of Osiris - OFO Forum
Guide to the Gameplay Forum | NS Discord Links | One Stop Rules Shop
Max Barry on The Legend of Zelda
<Zaolat>: maxbarry: Have you played any Legend of Zelda video game?
<maxbarry>: I have NEVER played Zelda, I know that is shocking
Victim of the Flag Thief

User avatar
Socialist Space Republic
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 144
Founded: Aug 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Space Republic » Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:52 am

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...
Comrade Admiral of The Red Fleet
Joint the anti-fascist fight! Join The Red Fleet!
Proud Lance Corporal and Politruk of SRBT

User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:59 am

Zaolat wrote:
SkyDip wrote:Bad speech, Mahaj. But good luck anyway. :hug:

That was obviously Tramiar.

Obviously not that obvious.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.

User avatar
Klaus Devestatorie
Minister
 
Posts: 2812
Founded: Aug 28, 2008
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Klaus Devestatorie » Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:37 am

Sedgistan wrote:It's like Apple just replaced Steve Jobs with the guy that drove his car.

I can't stop giggling at this.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:34 am

Sedgistan wrote:It's like Apple just replaced Steve Jobs with the guy that drove his car.

Congrats anyway.This should be interesting.


Unibot > Steve Jobs to be honest.
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:40 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Sedgistan wrote:It's like Apple just replaced Steve Jobs with the guy that drove his car.

Congrats anyway.This should be interesting.


Unibot > Steve Jobs to be honest.

Slow your roll. Let's not get too overzealous, here.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:40 am

SkyDip wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Unibot > Steve Jobs to be honest.

Slow your roll. Let's not get too overzealous, here.


Overzealous? My opinion on Steve Jobs is so low that even Francos Spain ranks above him. And I'm not a fan of them either.
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sun Jun 16, 2013 10:27 am

The United Defenders League wrote:So I, Mahaj, can promise the world, the UDL will be stronger in its fight against raiders.


I, for one, am looking forward to the era of unparalleled imperialist dominance in NS that is now dawning. :p
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Sun Jun 16, 2013 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Andacantra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Jul 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Andacantra » Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:00 pm

Mahaj wrote:If you are ready to characterize my leadership based on one balcony speech, then no amount of actions could convince you otherwise.

Well, if you were going to make change within the UDL a significant part of being CoTB, I'd have expected to see it in said "balcony speech". Thus far, I have seen absolutely no evidence that such change is going to take place, and from various experiences, I know that some UDLers either don't feel change is needed or they won't dare say it (note, some - not all.) The burden's on you here.

Feel free to surprise me.
Abbey
Chief Kitty of the Cat Burglars
Bi-gameplayers: Raiding and defending because both are fun and ok
Nationstates Issues **SPOILER ALERT**

User avatar
PrussianEmpire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 907
Founded: Dec 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby PrussianEmpire » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:25 pm

Andacantra wrote:
Mahaj wrote:If you are ready to characterize my leadership based on one balcony speech, then no amount of actions could convince you otherwise.

Well, if you were going to make change within the UDL a significant part of being CoTB, I'd have expected to see it in said "balcony speech". Thus far, I have seen absolutely no evidence that such change is going to take place, and from various experiences, I know that some UDLers either don't feel change is needed or they won't dare say it (note, some - not all.) The burden's on you here.

Feel free to surprise me.


Only the merrymen seem to support any change.
—« The PrussianEmpire From The East Pacific »—

The contents of the above post represent the views of Exshaw, the Imperial Legion, the United Defenders League, the Founderless Regions Alliance, the New Inquisition, the Black Hawks, the North Pacific, the Alliance Defense Network, the Atlantic Central Command, Francos Spain, Dwight Eisenhower, and the 1998 New York Yankees.

User avatar
Karputsk
Envoy
 
Posts: 279
Founded: May 10, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Karputsk » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:46 pm

Prussia, stop speaking about the UDL as if you are something of an expert.
~Commander of the Rejected Realms Army~

User avatar
SkyDip
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1735
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby SkyDip » Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:57 pm

Karputsk wrote:Prussia, stop speaking about the UDL as if you are something of an expert.

Karp, stop...oh wait.
Elias Thaddeus Greyjoy, WA Ambassador of SkyDip
Read my Guide to the Security Council, a comprehensive collection of history, tactics, and tips for the Security Council!


Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.

Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.

Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.

Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.

User avatar
Mahaj
Senator
 
Posts: 4110
Founded: Dec 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mahaj » Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:58 pm

PrussianEmpire wrote:
Andacantra wrote:Well, if you were going to make change within the UDL a significant part of being CoTB, I'd have expected to see it in said "balcony speech". Thus far, I have seen absolutely no evidence that such change is going to take place, and from various experiences, I know that some UDLers either don't feel change is needed or they won't dare say it (note, some - not all.) The burden's on you here.

Feel free to surprise me.


Only the merrymen seem to support any change.

This is incorrect.
Aal Izz Well: UDL
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations

User avatar
PrussianEmpire
Diplomat
 
Posts: 907
Founded: Dec 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby PrussianEmpire » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:13 pm

Karputsk wrote:Prussia, stop speaking about the UDL as if you are something of an expert.


Not like much has changed in the month since I left the UDL.

@Mahaj,I'm just stating my observations.. Since I haven't seen anything related to UDL politics in the past month, my opinions could easily be dated.
—« The PrussianEmpire From The East Pacific »—

The contents of the above post represent the views of Exshaw, the Imperial Legion, the United Defenders League, the Founderless Regions Alliance, the New Inquisition, the Black Hawks, the North Pacific, the Alliance Defense Network, the Atlantic Central Command, Francos Spain, Dwight Eisenhower, and the 1998 New York Yankees.

User avatar
Mahaj
Senator
 
Posts: 4110
Founded: Dec 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Mahaj » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:33 pm

PrussianEmpire wrote:
Karputsk wrote:Prussia, stop speaking about the UDL as if you are something of an expert.


Not like much has changed in the month since I left the UDL.

@Mahaj,I'm just stating my observations.. Since I haven't seen anything related to UDL politics in the past month, my opinions could easily be dated.

So you simultaneously say that not much has changed, but your opinion could be dated?

Its almost like you have no clue what you're talking about. Oh wait...
Aal Izz Well: UDL
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations

User avatar
Cormac Stark
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1417
Founded: Apr 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormac Stark » Sun Jun 16, 2013 7:39 pm

I'm bringing this over here from this thread because, as Solm pointed out, it belongs here rather than there.

The problem with the UDL's policy on defending Nazis is that it's incoherent and you're trying to do two things with a policy that only does one of them. The policy, as designed by Unibot (with others' input, I'm sure), is to protect the consciences of individual UDL members who don't want to defend Nazis. The FRA also has such a conscience protection policy in that Rangers are allowed to opt not to defend Nazi regions, at least if I've understood their policy correctly. Unibot felt that this did not go far enough and that UDL members who might not want to defend Nazis would feel pressured and uncomfortable, so he decided that the UDL would not defend Nazi regions at all -- though individual members were still free to do so.

That is a conscience protection policy. It is not a "cover our rears to avoid controversy" policy. It can't be, because your individual members are still your members. They are still sitting in your channel at update (even if they're not organizing the defense there), they are still moving from your jump point, etc. If you really want to avoid the controversy associated with defending Nazis, you need a much stronger policy -- either a policy that prohibits use of Kyzikos and asks them to leave the channel when engaging in such defenses, or a policy that prohibits such defenses altogether and carries penalties for engaging in them.

You're free to either do that or not do that, but don't expect to be able to invoke your conscience protection policy and expect it to cover your rears. Nobody outside the UDL is buying it, and I don't think they ever have, and I don't think they will if you just say it a few more times.

User avatar
Cerian Quilor
Senator
 
Posts: 3841
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Cerian Quilor » Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:19 pm

You might even be honest about it, but if UDL policy is to not defend Nazis, make that clear and make sure no one does it. You're a military. Give them orders.

When I found out that someone in Kantrias was helping prop up German Dragons (because he thought the whole liberate to attack thing was scummy) I ordered him out, because that's not what Kantrias is about. And he was out. And Its not like I could legally stop him (I mean, I could expel him from the RKA, but there hadn't been any law on the books about it, and the Constitution bans ex post facto laws, so it wasn't that much). But making it clear worked.

The UDL, on the other hand, as a military and little else, can actually do this thing where they give orders and expect them to be followed. Can discharge people for violating orders, demote them, et cetera.

So if the policy of the UDL is to not defend Nazi regions, then you need to make sure members of the UDL either get it, or aren't in the UDL anymore. Or just say that the UDL doesn't have a policy on Nazi Regions.
Never underestimate the power of cynicism, pessimism and negativity to prevent terrible things from happening. Only idealists try to build the future on a mountain of bodies.

The Thing to Remember About NationStates is that it is an almost entirely social game - fundamentally, you have no power beyond your own ability to convince people to go along with your ideas. In that sense, even the most dictatorial region is fundamentally democratic.

User avatar
Tlik
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1253
Founded: Jan 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tlik » Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:52 am

Cerian Quilor wrote:You might even be honest about it, but if UDL policy is to not defend Nazis, make that clear and make sure no one does it. You're a military. Give them orders.

When I found out that someone in Kantrias was helping prop up German Dragons (because he thought the whole liberate to attack thing was scummy) I ordered him out, because that's not what Kantrias is about. And he was out. And Its not like I could legally stop him (I mean, I could expel him from the RKA, but there hadn't been any law on the books about it, and the Constitution bans ex post facto laws, so it wasn't that much). But making it clear worked.

The UDL, on the other hand, as a military and little else, can actually do this thing where they give orders and expect them to be followed. Can discharge people for violating orders, demote them, et cetera.

So if the policy of the UDL is to not defend Nazi regions, then you need to make sure members of the UDL either get it, or aren't in the UDL anymore. Or just say that the UDL doesn't have a policy on Nazi Regions.

I'm really not sure it's that hard to get your head around.

UDL members can defend whoever they hell they like. Including Nazis. In fact, UDL members can do whatever the hell they like, except for raiding. (For clarification's sake, they also can't raid Nazis. I know that's already been discussed, but considering we're having this discussion again it's probably good to get the basics down again.)

The UDL as an organisation will never ask or instruct any of its members to defend Nazi regions. Any UDL member who is acting as a position of authority such that they their commands and requests could be interpreted as orders to be followed by other members must at the very least ensure that any mission they discuss involving the defence of Nazis be strongly and publically stated as entirely unsponsored by the UDL.

While I don't believe there are any official documents discussing the practicalities of this, it should probably be assumed that a group of UDL members sharing a bond of friendship outside of mere colleagueship, who have (afaik) made sure that they have not used UDL channels and resources (Kyzikos is a defender jump-point, not a UDL jump-point) should not in fact be considered a UDL mission.

This is in the same way that when a group of people discuss how they're going to have a quick kickaround* after they get off work, the company they work for is not usually held responsible.

You're reading this, and I can suddenly see the glimmer of hope in your eye. 'Aha!' you think, 'There is an easy way to show these fools at the UDL what's what.' Why yes, dear Cerian, there is. To show that everything I've been saying is nonsense, to destroy the UDL, and to ultimately fulfill your goal of making Kantrias the best defenders in the realm by knocking out your competition (you don't stand a chance otherwise) all you need to do is find a single UDL member who feels as if they have been pressured into defending Nazis. Because that's what this is about. Not whether one should or shouldn't defend Nazis, because that's a fool's debate, and we all know the winning side is whichever side Cormac isn't on. (It's one of the more consistent places to stand if you want to perpetually disagree with him.) This is a debate on whether the UDL has enough integrity that when it sets a policy on, for example, defending Nazis, it fulfills not only the criteria for that policy (which in this case is quite hard to tell due to not being able to see the UDL channel at update) but also the goal of the policy. In this case, are there any people who feel like UDL members acting on behalf of the UDL as a whole have pressured them - as UDL members, of course - to defend Nazis.

I mean, come on! There's enough disgruntled ex-members in this thread alone to give you a fighting chance! Get that PR machine into action, Cerian, or Kantrias will never win anything at the Defender Awards.

* That is, play 'soccer' or football in a relaxed, friendly and non-competitive manner, for our American friends

User avatar
Cerian Quilor
Senator
 
Posts: 3841
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Cerian Quilor » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:13 am

:palm:

Wow. And I thought no one could beat Mahaj in the stupidity olympics.
Never underestimate the power of cynicism, pessimism and negativity to prevent terrible things from happening. Only idealists try to build the future on a mountain of bodies.

The Thing to Remember About NationStates is that it is an almost entirely social game - fundamentally, you have no power beyond your own ability to convince people to go along with your ideas. In that sense, even the most dictatorial region is fundamentally democratic.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:17 am

Tlik wrote:[...] your goal of making Kantrias the best defenders in the realm by knocking out your competition [...]
[...] or Kantrias will never win anything at the Defender Awards.


Please tell me it's just a broken sarcasm detector on my part and this isn't serious.

Please.
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:18 am, edited 2 times in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
McMasterdonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 958
Founded: Apr 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby McMasterdonia » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:32 am

Congratulations Mahaj. Best of luck.

User avatar
Rick Rollers United
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jun 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rick Rollers United » Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:54 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Tlik wrote:[...] your goal of making Kantrias the best defenders in the realm by knocking out your competition [...]
[...] or Kantrias will never win anything at the Defender Awards.


Please tell me it's just a broken sarcasm detector on my part and this isn't serious.

Please.

It has to be. Even he can't be that stupid.

-Cerian.

User avatar
Tlik
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1253
Founded: Jan 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tlik » Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:18 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Tlik wrote:[...] your goal of making Kantrias the best defenders in the realm by knocking out your competition [...]
[...] or Kantrias will never win anything at the Defender Awards.


Please tell me it's just a broken sarcasm detector on my part and this isn't serious.

Please.

You didn't get that as sarcasm? Kantrias, defending? Maybe one day, but it's a bit unrealistic to hope for. Still, even the seemingly impossible dreams are worth believing in, right?

Cerian Quilor wrote::palm:

Wow. And I thought no one could beat Mahaj in the stupidity olympics.

Thank you! *beams*

Do I get a medal? Can we have an awards ceremony? Or is that just something to say when you can't come up with a proper response?

User avatar
Gavin Novawk
Attaché
 
Posts: 90
Founded: Jan 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Gavin Novawk » Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:15 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The United Defenders League wrote:So I, Mahaj, can promise the world, the UDL will be stronger in its fight against raiders.


I, for one, am looking forward to the era of unparalleled imperialist dominance in NS that is now dawning. :p

:clap:
Gavin Grey-Anumia Caedus-Turn Talleyrand-Oldenburg Novawk
His Imperial Highness, Gavin, by the gift of His Supreme Majesty, Prince Imperial of The Land of Kings and Emperors and Archduke of Ilum
His Royal Highness, Prince Regent of Clindea & Prince-Imperial of Markarth
Governor-General of Vienna
Archduke of the Regal Realm of The Kingdom of Denmark
These are the views of myself and no other.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Gameplay

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Notanam

Advertisement

Remove ads