NATION

PASSWORD

Ether

Talk about regional management and politics, raider/defender gameplay, and other game-related matters.
Not a roleplaying forum.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cerian Quilor
Senator
 
Posts: 3841
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Cerian Quilor » Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:23 pm

That's not what they said at all.

:palm:
Never underestimate the power of cynicism, pessimism and negativity to prevent terrible things from happening. Only idealists try to build the future on a mountain of bodies.

The Thing to Remember About NationStates is that it is an almost entirely social game - fundamentally, you have no power beyond your own ability to convince people to go along with your ideas. In that sense, even the most dictatorial region is fundamentally democratic.

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27796
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:26 pm

Cerian Quilor wrote:That's not what they said at all.

It's kinda hard to tell through the alcohol haze. Probably best to argue the point after the New Year Celebration (and hangover) have worn off.

User avatar
The Google Empire
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Dec 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Google Empire » Mon Dec 31, 2012 10:07 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:
Cerian Quilor wrote:That's not what they said at all.

It's kinda hard to tell through the alcohol haze. Probably best to argue the point after the New Year Celebration (and hangover) have worn off.

I was referring to what the TBRites said before drunk Cromarty

-Cerian.

User avatar
Cormac Stark
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1417
Founded: Apr 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormac Stark » Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:54 am

Galiantus wrote:
Claraoculos wrote:As long as the password is not leaked,the non-updaters can be evacuated and deployed elsewhere, with a skeleton force garrisoned in the region to await the inevitable Liberation proposal

Except that I will oppose all attempts at liberating Ether through the SC, so they won't have to worry about that.

If I understand it correctly, your reason for opposing a liberation resolution is because Glass Gallows and by extension Ether espouses the ideology of Aretism. Rather than opposing the World Assembly just for the sake of opposing it, Aretism advocates national and regional sovereignty as well as a meritocratic system -- which precludes the involvement of an outside, interregional force like the World Assembly in the affairs of nations or regions. You argue that interregional organizations should not impose their will upon sovereign nations or regions, even invaders, and that nations and regions should thrive or fail based on their own merits rather than the will of the interregional community as expressed through the World Assembly. This is your reason for opposing the World Assembly in general and specifically in this case for opposing a Security Council resolution to liberate Ether.

Please correct me if I have any of that wrong; I have only a cursory familiarity with Aretism but I think I've highlighted its basic points. I'll await your reply to see if I'm missing anything important before making my point.

User avatar
Klaus Devestatorie
Minister
 
Posts: 2938
Founded: Aug 28, 2008
Capitalizt

Postby Klaus Devestatorie » Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:03 am

Cormac Stark wrote:
Galiantus wrote:Except that I will oppose all attempts at liberating Ether through the SC, so they won't have to worry about that.

If I understand it correctly, your reason for opposing a liberation resolution is because Glass Gallows and by extension Ether espouses the ideology of Aretism. Rather than opposing the World Assembly just for the sake of opposing it, Aretism advocates national and regional sovereignty as well as a meritocratic system -- which precludes the involvement of an outside, interregional force like the World Assembly in the affairs of nations or regions. You argue that interregional organizations should not impose their will upon sovereign nations or regions, even invaders, and that nations and regions should thrive or fail based on their own merits rather than the will of the interregional community as expressed through the World Assembly. This is your reason for opposing the World Assembly in general and specifically in this case for opposing a Security Council resolution to liberate Ether.

Please correct me if I have any of that wrong; I have only a cursory familiarity with Aretism but I think I've highlighted its basic points. I'll await your reply to see if I'm missing anything important before making my point.


I'm pretty sure you've nailed it, although I defer to the knowledge of Galantius and Leonardo on Aretism.

User avatar
Claraoculos
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Feb 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Claraoculos » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:58 am

So, TBR et all beaten to the punch at major eh?

And after you had put in all that effort as well, such a waste.

Still be interesting to see how long the new overlords permit me to stay!

User avatar
Solorni
Minister
 
Posts: 3024
Founded: Sep 04, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Solorni » Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:48 am

Frattastan wrote:This is not a recruitment thread. It's more of a news/announcement thread.
If this is still deemed threadjack I will stop it, of course.

Cerian Quilor wrote:How often does, say,the ERN bancject natives? Or TNI (bar your favorite North Atlantic Example)?

TBR/TBH/DEN are not the only raiders in the world. When TNI captured such places as Scotland, or Belgium, or when the ERN occupied the Creed or Submerged Supercontinent of Eternal winter (The name was somethimg like that), they didn't banject natives at all.


The answer is "when they have the Influence to banject natives".
Nowadays all the mainstream raider groups don't have a problem with griefing. Actually I thought the ERN was anti-griefer, but I guess they changed their stance: they didn't protest when Wolf banned an impressive number of natives in Anarchy - a raid the ERN was supporting; plus that rubbish essay HEM wrote about regions being billboards with a name on it, and about griefing being a perfectly acceptable activity that doesn't affect "communities".

TNI tried to destroy Soviet Union both before and after it joined FRA. Colonisation, war ... it's nice to see they can come up with a random new reason each time, though.

Hmm... I think ERN left the Anarchy raid, but I'd have to double check.
Lovely Queen of Balder
Proud Delegate of WALL

Lucky Number 13

User avatar
Frattastan II
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1039
Founded: Nov 27, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan II » Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:59 am

Solorni wrote:Hmm... I think ERN left the Anarchy raid, but I'd have to double check.


I recall posting in the Euro Octagon thread about the Anarchy invasion pointing out: a) the massive amount of griefing going on; b) the fact that the GGR was supporting the raid. Although people were annoyed by the Nazi presence, nobody seemed upset about the former - and a few even had a good laugh about it.

The ERN then left the Anarchy, but seemingly only because of the GGR. I have always thought that - had it been only for those ~ 50 banjected natives - you would have stayed there till the end.

The withdrawal of ERN (and of its allies, like TNI) eventually closed the endorsement gap enough to allow for a liberation.
Those few GGR WAs were a painful price to pay for Wolf. :P
Last edited by Frattastan II on Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rejected Realms Army High Commander
(So you've been ejected..., forum, news, RRA)
<@Guy> well done, fuckhead.
* @Guy claps for frattastan

User avatar
Unibot III
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7113
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Unibot III » Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:12 am

Claraoculos wrote:Still be interesting to see how long the new overlords permit me to stay!


Always be your own overlord, Claraoculos. You'll likely be the the receiver of the founder account, but we've asked Galiantus to check with Glass Gallows.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Org. Join Date: 25-05-2008 | Former Delegate of TRR

Factbook // Collected works // Gameplay Alignment Test //
9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Headlines from Unibot // WASC HQ: A Guide

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✯ Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
Solorni
Minister
 
Posts: 3024
Founded: Sep 04, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Solorni » Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:12 am

Frattastan II wrote:
Solorni wrote:Hmm... I think ERN left the Anarchy raid, but I'd have to double check.


I recall posting in the Euro Octagon thread about the Anarchy invasion pointing out: a) the massive amount of griefing going on; b) the fact that the GGR was supporting the raid. Although people were annoyed by the Nazi presence, nobody seemed upset about the former - and a few even had a good laugh about it.

The ERN then left the Anarchy, but seemingly only because of the GGR. I have always thought that - had it been only for those ~ 50 banjected natives - you would have stayed there till the end.

The withdrawal of ERN (and of its allies, like TNI) eventually closed the endorsement gap enough to allow for a liberation.
Those few GGR WAs were a painful price to pay for Wolf. :P

Well, the people who had a laugh about the complaints were trolling and posting random pictures until they were asked to cut it out by Lethen. The thing is that it was not easy to tell if there was griefing or not, but it was easy to tell that there were Nazis. So it wasn't a matter of ignoring anything, simply a matter of simplicity. We were also dealing with the issue of how to do this in a politically correct way while dealing with EW. There was a lot on our plates and on top of that, we didn't even have a separate military head at the time as I was doing both the Presidency and the military head.

Europeia at that time (I can't speak for now) did not actively or knowingly support griefing. I'd also like to note that it was at that time that GGR started to come into the Europeian focus and would become a champion in fighting Nazi regions (going beyond most others). We did not adhere to the idea by EW that defenders were the final enemy and that Nazis were allies in this. I have always felt that the concept of raider unity should not be an end all, be all and EWs stance cost him as much as it would pain him to admit it. Sometimes, you have to take the political route and I have always felt that raider unity should be a friendly unity rather than one with such expectations and forcefulness. You get as much out of allies as they wish to give and you try to give as much as internal policies allow.
Last edited by Solorni on Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lovely Queen of Balder
Proud Delegate of WALL

Lucky Number 13

User avatar
Galiantus II
Envoy
 
Posts: 340
Founded: Jan 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Galiantus II » Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:07 am

Unibot III wrote:
Claraoculos wrote:Still be interesting to see how long the new overlords permit me to stay!


Always be your own overlord, Claraoculos. You'll likely be the the receiver of the founder account, but we've asked Galiantus to check with Glass Gallows.


Yes. And if there is a general consensus in Glass Gallows, I think it will happen by the end of the week.
The World Assembly shall be Utterly Destroyed by Galiantus!

Down With the World Assembly!

User avatar
Frattastan II
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1039
Founded: Nov 27, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Frattastan II » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:03 pm

Solorni wrote:The thing is that it was not easy to tell if there was griefing or not, but it was easy to tell that there were Nazis.


About fifty non-defender nations banned. Were they all defender sleepers?
Is it griefing only when the region has been emptied, refounded, locked down and says "Captured by Lone Wolves United"?
Can we afford to state a cautious "It may be a potential grief-like situation" before that or is it always too early to tell and we should simply wait how the situation develops? :P

Fair enough, though. I know Euro's population favours raiding but is opposed to griefing (and would even support fighting them). :)
If this is reflected by the ERN policies, even better.
Last edited by Frattastan II on Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rejected Realms Army High Commander
(So you've been ejected..., forum, news, RRA)
<@Guy> well done, fuckhead.
* @Guy claps for frattastan

User avatar
Lyanna Stark
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 480
Founded: Dec 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lyanna Stark » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:10 pm

Galiantus II wrote:
Unibot III wrote:
Always be your own overlord, Claraoculos. You'll likely be the the receiver of the founder account, but we've asked Galiantus to check with Glass Gallows.


Yes. And if there is a general consensus in Glass Gallows, I think it will happen by the end of the week.


Just let me know what's worked out and all. :)
-Lyanna Stark
Sepatarch, Admin, and Vizier of Culture of Osiris
Former Pharaoh (Delegate) of Osiris
♥ Earth Marlowe-Locksley ♥

"Only one man in a thousand is a leader of men. The other 999 follow women." -Groucho Marx
Unibot: "I've turned you into a defender chick and you've turned me into a respectable human being!"
[11:12pm]Mahaj: omg i have earth's endo
[11:12pm] Mahaj: this is the proudest moment of my defending career

User avatar
Mallorea and Riva
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 9987
Founded: Sep 29, 2010
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Mallorea and Riva » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:15 pm

Frattastan II wrote:
Solorni wrote:The thing is that it was not easy to tell if there was griefing or not, but it was easy to tell that there were Nazis.


About fifty non-defender nations banned. Were they all defender sleepers?

Yes.
Ideological Bulwark #253
Retired Major of The Black Hawks
Retired Charter Nation: Political Affairs in Antarctic Oasis
Retired Colonel of DEN Central Command, now defunct
Former Delegate of The South Pacific, winner of TSP's "Best Dali" Award
Retired Secretary of Defense of Stargate
Terror of The Joint Systems Alliance
Mall Isaraider, son of Tram and Spartz, Brother of Tal and apparently Sev the treacherous bastard.
Frattastan quote of the month: Mall is following those weird beef-only diets now.

User avatar
The Bruce
Diplomat
 
Posts: 641
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby The Bruce » Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:52 pm

Was the refounding initiated by natives, defenders, or invaders? In other words, who was in control of the region when it was being emptied to refound?

User avatar
Jamie Anumia
Senator
 
Posts: 3797
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamie Anumia » Tue Jan 22, 2013 3:53 pm

The Bruce wrote:Was the refounding initiated by natives, defenders, or invaders? In other words, who was in control of the region when it was being emptied to refound?

TBR were.

User avatar
Cerian Quilor
Senator
 
Posts: 3841
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Cerian Quilor » Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:41 pm

Claraoculos wrote:So, TBR et all beaten to the punch at major eh?

And after you had put in all that effort as well, such a waste.

Still be interesting to see how long the new overlords permit me to stay!

Define 'waste', Clara. You don't get to set mission objectives. TBR does.
Never underestimate the power of cynicism, pessimism and negativity to prevent terrible things from happening. Only idealists try to build the future on a mountain of bodies.

The Thing to Remember About NationStates is that it is an almost entirely social game - fundamentally, you have no power beyond your own ability to convince people to go along with your ideas. In that sense, even the most dictatorial region is fundamentally democratic.

User avatar
Communist Eraser
Diplomat
 
Posts: 547
Founded: Dec 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Communist Eraser » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:36 pm

Cerian Quilor wrote:
Claraoculos wrote:So, TBR et all beaten to the punch at major eh?

And after you had put in all that effort as well, such a waste.

Still be interesting to see how long the new overlords permit me to stay!

Define 'waste', Clara. You don't get to set mission objectives. TBR does.


It's obvious to every man and his dog Ether was aiming for a refound. Don't say that isn't the mission objective. UDL caught it first. Mission objective failed.
EASTERN EUROPE: The MELTING POT OF IDEOLOGIES
An Libertarian Socialist Peacezone. Four Principles of Peacezone Theory


User avatar
Cerian Quilor
Senator
 
Posts: 3841
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Cerian Quilor » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:37 pm

Missions can have multiple objectives, and the refound is just one part of it.
Never underestimate the power of cynicism, pessimism and negativity to prevent terrible things from happening. Only idealists try to build the future on a mountain of bodies.

The Thing to Remember About NationStates is that it is an almost entirely social game - fundamentally, you have no power beyond your own ability to convince people to go along with your ideas. In that sense, even the most dictatorial region is fundamentally democratic.

User avatar
Everbeek
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 452
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Everbeek » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:39 pm

Cerian Quilor wrote:Missions can have multiple objectives, and the refound is just one part of it.

...
And that part failed.
The Awesomeness Formerly Known As Campinia
Cromarty wrote:Antifa, the Internationale and the Red Fleet are encased in the largest glass house in existence, and they're not throwing stones, they're firing boulders from catapults.

Big Jim P wrote:
Everbeek wrote:I never say "for god's sake", I always say "for fuck's sake", for the rest I don't care much


Fucking created most of us, so fucking IS god.

User avatar
Klaus Devestatorie
Minister
 
Posts: 2938
Founded: Aug 28, 2008
Capitalizt

Postby Klaus Devestatorie » Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:46 pm

Cerian Quilor wrote:Missions can have multiple objectives, and the refound is just one part of it.

Cerian, please, do yourself a favor and don't screw up Halc's PR on his behalf.

User avatar
Eist
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1197
Founded: May 10, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Eist » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:09 pm

Klaus Devestatorie wrote:
Cerian Quilor wrote:Missions can have multiple objectives, and the refound is just one part of it.

Cerian, please, do yourself a favor and don't screw up Halc's PR on his behalf.


I have this theory that Cerian is actually a defender that is undercover and going out his way to make raiders look like they are all bat-shit insane to reduce their credibility. He's the equivalent of Michele Bachmann with the Republican Party.
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:28 pm

Eist wrote:
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:Cerian, please, do yourself a favor and don't screw up Halc's PR on his behalf.


I have this theory that Cerian is actually a defender that is undercover and going out his way to make raiders look like they are all bat-shit insane to reduce their credibility. He's the equivalent of Michele Bachmann with the Republican Party.


Michele Bachmann is a defender? :o
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:39 pm

I hope this is the case because otherwise Cerian is reaching the levels I used to go to to excuse UDL stuff XD
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
A Million Voices
Envoy
 
Posts: 275
Founded: Feb 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby A Million Voices » Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:46 pm

What I think Cerian is trying to say is that this is hardly a flawless UDL victory. It is a victory all the same, but a close one.

We sat on the region and partied for a month and a half with the only effort to save the region being guerilla spammers. It was rescued at the end, but the fact that the region was saved by a matter of milliseconds should mean no one has the right to act cocky. We weren't 100% successful, but you could say we were 60%.
Silencing an opponent is not the same as converting him.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Gameplay

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aason, Dakota, Davelands Secret LWU Piler Puppet, Emiline, Impolite Penguin, Jabberwocky, Obrimenja, Omnicontrol, Quasi-Stellar Star Civilizations, Sateru, Scardino, Te Ao, The Germans Of Berlin, The Islamic Country of Honour, The Second Psutasia, UFROE

Advertisement

Remove ads