by Claraoculos » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:39 pm
by Feux » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:42 pm
TheBestDudeInHistory wrote:Feux is what would happen if I had my shitposting physically removed, isolated, and permitted to become sentient on its own. And I mean that in the best way possible. Clearly I need to marry Feux.
by Ambroscus Koth » Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:38 pm
by Mallorea and Riva » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:01 pm
by Claraoculos » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:28 pm
by Cerian Quilor » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:52 pm
by Ambroscus Koth » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:54 pm
Claraoculos wrote:Mall,
Is that you renouncing tag raiding?
We may make a strategist of you yet!
PS I wouldn't count on Santa bring the refound for you this time round
by Andacantra » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:56 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:You know, we sat in Dharma for two months just because we could. If any of the natives had chosen to annoy us the way you're trying to annoy TBR, we would have stayed and refounded it no matter how long it took. I look forward to TBR completing the task of destroying Ether.
by Cerian Quilor » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:59 pm
Andacantra wrote:Mallorea and Riva wrote:You know, we sat in Dharma for two months just because we could. If any of the natives had chosen to annoy us the way you're trying to annoy TBR, we would have stayed and refounded it no matter how long it took. I look forward to TBR completing the task of destroying Ether.
So natives are just supposed to sit down and take their region being nuked quietly? Yeah, right. It's not exactly like asking TBR really really nicely to leave is going to make them stop, now is it? Does standing up to bullies always produce the best result? Not always, but I'll be damned if that'll ever stop me.
Note that I'm not going for the OMG Evil charade here...I just think causing more damage to a region because the natives had the -nerve- to stick up for themselves is petty, to be brutally honest.
by Andacantra » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:09 pm
Cerian Quilor wrote:Andacantra wrote:So natives are just supposed to sit down and take their region being nuked quietly? Yeah, right. It's not exactly like asking TBR really really nicely to leave is going to make them stop, now is it? Does standing up to bullies always produce the best result? Not always, but I'll be damned if that'll ever stop me.
Note that I'm not going for the OMG Evil charade here...I just think causing more damage to a region because the natives had the -nerve- to stick up for themselves is petty, to be brutally honest.
And? You act like being petty in a game isn't fun. I like getting at people who annoy me. That's the main reason why I'm keeping the RKA in Ether - I'm personally not fond of Galiantus (in-game) or the ideology of his region, Glass Gallows, which is Aretism. Since Glass Gallows has Ether as a protectorate, and Glass Gallows is foundered, Ether is the best way to attack them.
by Gest » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Andacantra wrote:I just think that just because we're playing a game, we shouldn't abandon the fact that there are in fact people on the other side of nations.
But I won't do that, and if any defender group who decides to liberate Ether decides that they trust me enough to let me help, then I'm entirely willing to do so. Good on you, Claraoculos, for deciding to actually argue back
by Andacantra » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:30 pm
Gest wrote:Andacantra wrote:I just think that just because we're playing a game, we shouldn't abandon the fact that there are in fact people on the other side of nations.
That's so corny it tastes like diabetes.But I won't do that, and if any defender group who decides to liberate Ether decides that they trust me enough to let me help, then I'm entirely willing to do so. Good on you, Claraoculos, for deciding to actually argue back
Once upon a time the Americans told the Hungarians "You guys should totally revolt against the Soviet occupation". They did. It went as well you think it would.
by Claraoculos » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:41 pm
Ambroscus Koth wrote:
Do you even have any idea what you're talking about
by Mahaj » Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:52 pm
<Koth> I'm still going by the assumption that Mahaj is Unibot's kid brother or something
Kandarin(Naivetry): You're going to have a great NS career ahead of you if you want it, Mahaj. :)
<@Eluvatar> Why is SkyDip such a purist raiderist
<+frattastan> Because his region was never raided.
<+maxbarry> EarthAway: I guess I might dabble in raiding just to experience it better, but I would not like to raid regions of natives, so I'd probably be more interested in defense and liberations
by Mallorea and Riva » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:25 pm
Andacantra wrote:Mallorea and Riva wrote:You know, we sat in Dharma for two months just because we could. If any of the natives had chosen to annoy us the way you're trying to annoy TBR, we would have stayed and refounded it no matter how long it took. I look forward to TBR completing the task of destroying Ether.
So natives are just supposed to sit down and take their region being nuked quietly? Yeah, right. It's not exactly like asking TBR really really nicely to leave is going to make them stop, now is it? Does standing up to bullies always produce the best result? Not always, but I'll be damned if that'll ever stop me.
Note that I'm not going for the OMG Evil charade here...I just think causing more damage to a region because the natives had the -nerve- to stick up for themselves is petty, to be brutally honest.
by Cerian Quilor » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:31 pm
Andacantra wrote:Cerian Quilor wrote:And? You act like being petty in a game isn't fun. I like getting at people who annoy me. That's the main reason why I'm keeping the RKA in Ether - I'm personally not fond of Galiantus (in-game) or the ideology of his region, Glass Gallows, which is Aretism. Since Glass Gallows has Ether as a protectorate, and Glass Gallows is foundered, Ether is the best way to attack them.
I just think that just because we're playing a game, we shouldn't abandon the fact that there are in fact people on the other side of nations. And even if we ignore the fact that people place meaning on their regions (not to mention histories on the RMB and such), in these situations you're treating the person behind that nation like an idiot that you just fancy trampling on because you can. You're doing it purely to piss somebody else off, it's not even like there's any greater cause or reason to it...you just feel like being douches in-game. And that's your perogative.
But I won't do that, and if any defender group who decides to liberate Ether decides that they trust me enough to let me help, then I'm entirely willing to do so. Good on you, Claraoculos, for deciding to actually argue back
by Cormac Stark » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:27 pm
by Claraoculos » Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:34 am
by Cromarty » Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:05 am
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Feuer Ritter » Tue Dec 18, 2012 2:35 am
Andacantra wrote:Note that I'm not going for the OMG Evil charade here...I just think causing more damage to a region because the natives had the -nerve- to stick up for themselves is petty, to be brutally honest.
by Andacantra » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:04 am
Feuer Ritter wrote:Andacantra wrote:Note that I'm not going for the OMG Evil charade here...I just think causing more damage to a region because the natives had the -nerve- to stick up for themselves is petty, to be brutally honest.
That's the whole point, the more you resist, the more you entice us to do worse things to your regions. So is better to stay cool.
by Ambroscus Koth » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:03 am
by Claraoculos » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:12 am
by Cerian Quilor » Tue Dec 18, 2012 7:54 am
Cormac Stark wrote:Claraoculos wrote:
Yes actually, I was raiding and defending well before the rise and fall of Asgard - how are you dealing with that loss by the way?
By the looks of it, he's dealing with it fine. He's a sergeant in The Black Riders with a rather successful command history and the co-founder of The Brotherhood of Malice, which is already making a name for itself.
I'd just like to remind you that Asgard was throughout its short history a friend to Glass Gallows. We would very likely have opposed and not participated in this griefing -- certainly I would not have authorized our involvement -- and the founder of Asgard, which is to say me, will likely be participating in any liberation attempt should one even be possible. Let's leave the pot shots at dead regions out of this and let Asgard rest in peace, shall we? You're certainly not endearing yourself to anyone at this point and should a liberation attempt arise I may just sit this one out.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Evil Mother
Advertisement