Advertisement
by Queen Yuno » Sun May 15, 2022 11:57 am
by Hulldom » Sun May 15, 2022 12:03 pm
Queen Yuno wrote:Damn, Hulldom, I did a double-take at that address, thinking that you had won the Delegate elections.
by Durkadurkiranistan II » Wed May 18, 2022 12:38 am
Tinhampton wrote:Dreadton wrote:Because of recent events in the United States, there are many people concerned about the future of their rights being taken away... Each day our regional flag will change to the portrait of a person who was killed, murdered, or assaulted for something they could not change, themselves.
I was under the impression that abortion was a choice.
by Hulldom » Sun Jun 12, 2022 2:06 pm
by Quebecshire » Sun Jun 12, 2022 2:24 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:I founded a defender organization out of my dislike of invaders, what invading represents, and my desire to see them suffer.
Pergamon wrote:I must say, you are truly what they deserve.
by ShrewLlamaLand » Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:46 pm
by Umbratellus » Mon Jun 20, 2022 3:28 am
ShrewLlamaLand wrote:I am eagerly awaiting the upcoming statement on anti-"fascist" delegate bumping, great job as always TNP!
by ShrewLlamaLand » Mon Jun 20, 2022 3:37 am
Umbratellus wrote:ShrewLlamaLand wrote:I am eagerly awaiting the upcoming statement on anti-"fascist" delegate bumping, great job as always TNP!
Can you explain what “Delegate Bumping” is? A bunch of North Pacific puppets endorsed and then un-endorsed my friend last night and I presume this would be connected? I’ve never paid too much attention to gameplay so I’m not sure the purpose.
by Umbratellus » Mon Jun 20, 2022 3:42 am
ShrewLlamaLand wrote:Umbratellus wrote:Can you explain what “Delegate Bumping” is? A bunch of North Pacific puppets endorsed and then un-endorsed my friend last night and I presume this would be connected? I’ve never paid too much attention to gameplay so I’m not sure the purpose.
That's exactly what delegate bumping is. Simply, a Delegate's approval of a proposal is removed if they are displaced as Delegate.
TNP's counter-campaign telegram wasn't quite effective enough to ensure the proposal I submitted would be brought below quorum, so they had to come along and delegate bump a couple dozen regions just to make sure.
At least some people liked my joke proposal, including the Delegates for The Rejected Realms and The Order of the Grey Wardens who had temporarily approved it, but of course TNP's influence runs a little too strong throughout NSGP for those approvals to stand.
by WayNeacTia » Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:57 am
ShrewLlamaLand wrote:Umbratellus wrote:Can you explain what “Delegate Bumping” is? A bunch of North Pacific puppets endorsed and then un-endorsed my friend last night and I presume this would be connected? I’ve never paid too much attention to gameplay so I’m not sure the purpose.
That's exactly what delegate bumping is. Simply, a Delegate's approval of a proposal is removed if they are displaced as Delegate.
TNP's counter-campaign telegram wasn't quite effective enough to ensure the proposal I submitted would be brought below quorum, so they had to come along and delegate bump a couple dozen regions just to make sure.
At least some people liked my joke proposal, including the Delegates for The Rejected Realms and The Order of the Grey Wardens who had temporarily approved it, but of course TNP's influence runs a little too strong throughout NSGP for those approvals to stand.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by ShrewLlamaLand » Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:10 am
Wayneactia wrote:ShrewLlamaLand wrote:That's exactly what delegate bumping is. Simply, a Delegate's approval of a proposal is removed if they are displaced as Delegate.
TNP's counter-campaign telegram wasn't quite effective enough to ensure the proposal I submitted would be brought below quorum, so they had to come along and delegate bump a couple dozen regions just to make sure.
At least some people liked my joke proposal, including the Delegates for The Rejected Realms and The Order of the Grey Wardens who had temporarily approved it, but of course TNP's influence runs a little too strong throughout NSGP for those approvals to stand.
It was never going to make quorum....
by WayNeacTia » Mon Jun 20, 2022 6:03 am
ShrewLlamaLand wrote:Wayneactia wrote:It was never going to make quorum....
It certainly was, even despite TNP's counter-campaign telegram we were within 10 approvals with about 17 hours to go last I checked before the quorum raid.
If neither of those had occurred, it would have made quorum fairly comfortably.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Umbratellus » Mon Jun 20, 2022 6:38 am
Wayneactia wrote:ShrewLlamaLand wrote:It certainly was, even despite TNP's counter-campaign telegram we were within 10 approvals with about 17 hours to go last I checked before the quorum raid.
If neither of those had occurred, it would have made quorum fairly comfortably.
I say once again, it was never going to make quorum. It was an amusing try, and I do like amusing. That being said, it was never going to vote. You know this, I know this, and anybody with any sort of experience around here knows this....
by WayNeacTia » Mon Jun 20, 2022 6:49 am
Umbratellus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:I say once again, it was never going to make quorum. It was an amusing try, and I do like amusing. That being said, it was never going to vote. You know this, I know this, and anybody with any sort of experience around here knows this....
The very existence of a counter-campaign is a de-facto admission that a proposal is likely to achieve quorum. No one will conduct a campaign against Super Straight Month because it is understood that it has 0% chance of ever making it to a vote. Sending telegrams out against a proposal is an admission of its present success; doing a delegate bumping effort is a sign of its likely future admission to the floor. Would it succeed there? Unlikely. It probably would have gotten there, though.
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by ShrewLlamaLand » Mon Jun 20, 2022 6:51 am
Umbratellus wrote:Wayneactia wrote:I say once again, it was never going to make quorum. It was an amusing try, and I do like amusing. That being said, it was never going to vote. You know this, I know this, and anybody with any sort of experience around here knows this....
The very existence of a counter-campaign is a de-facto admission that a proposal is likely to achieve quorum. No one will conduct a campaign against Super Straight Month because it is understood that it has 0% chance of ever making it to a vote. Sending telegrams out against a proposal is an admission of its present success; doing a delegate bumping effort is a sign of its likely future admission to the floor. Would it succeed there? Unlikely. It probably would have gotten there, though.
by Madjack » Mon Jun 20, 2022 7:32 am
by Madjack » Mon Jun 20, 2022 7:40 am
Sedgistan wrote:Is there a point at which TNP wouldn't consider CCD as "fascist"? What would they need to change to accomplish that?
by ShrewLlamaLand » Mon Jun 20, 2022 7:42 am
Madjack wrote:TNP opposing fascist regions using the World Assembly to advance themselves is something everyone should be able to predict, Nostradamus.
by Madjack » Mon Jun 20, 2022 7:44 am
by ShrewLlamaLand » Mon Jun 20, 2022 7:46 am
Madjack wrote:But you have managed to fool some people into thinking you aren't fascist any longer, so it's more important to say that you are.
by Morover » Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:16 am
ShrewLlamaLand wrote:Wayneactia wrote:It was never going to make quorum....
It certainly was, even despite TNP's counter-campaign telegram we were within 10 approvals with about 17 hours to go last I checked before the quorum raid.
If neither of those had occurred, it would have made quorum fairly comfortably.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Canadian Democratic Union
Advertisement