by Neasmyrna » Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:04 pm
by Durkadurkiranistan » Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:55 pm
by Falconias » Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:58 pm
by Durkadurkiranistan » Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:39 pm
by Todd McCloud » Sat Oct 03, 2009 11:37 pm
by Northern Chittowa » Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:14 am
by Numero Capitan » Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:15 pm
by Todd McCloud » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:08 pm
by Todd McCloud » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:12 pm
by New Kervoskia » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:24 pm
by Moo-cows with guns » Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:12 pm
Todd McCloud wrote:Perhaps I'll retain the top spot still!
Though it is doubtful. I don't think Moo will have the #2 spot anymore though.
by Dalimbar » Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:29 am
by Kurdazistan » Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:35 am
by Alsted » Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:59 am
by Sedgistan » Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:02 am
by Todd McCloud » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:47 pm
Kurdazistan wrote:I think Todd's list is pretty right on, but there will be a few random up and comers.
by Kandarin » Fri Oct 09, 2009 5:57 pm
Alsted wrote:Can't 234 endorsements buy a man more than one vote?
I wish I remember who wrote:Games like Nationstates are like a big cardboard box, and there are two kinds of people in the world. The kind who look at the empty void inside the box and ask "Where the hell is it?" and the kind who jump into the box with their friends and make it into a fort, or a spaceship.
by Rigbyland » Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:55 am
by Sedgistan » Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:30 am
Rigbyland wrote:
In the WA it'll get you 235. Maybe that should be part of the most influential/powerful measure? Using just the opinion of the few people who happen to see this thread or the old one doesn't seem very accurate...
by Docky » Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:21 pm
by Kurdazistan » Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:54 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyparissa, Elite, IDEVK, Improper Classifications
Advertisement